A phase II pilot study comparing a home total body strengthening programme plus manual therapy with a standard physiotherapy exercise regimen plus manual therapy in the management of chronic low back pain

Alex Daulat, Emily Goodlad
{"title":"A phase II pilot study comparing a home total body strengthening programme plus manual therapy with a standard physiotherapy exercise regimen plus manual therapy in the management of chronic low back pain","authors":"Alex Daulat, Emily Goodlad","doi":"10.1179/1753615414Y.0000000034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives To conduct a phase II pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing a home total body strengthening programme plus manual therapy with a standard physiotherapy exercise regimen plus manual therapy for the management of non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) and determine the feasibility for a larger RCT. Introduction There is moderate evidence for exercise combined with manual therapy in the treatment of CLBP. Patients with CLBP have decreased muscle power and cardiac capacity due to their low activity levels that leads to a de-conditioning syndrome and pain. This de-conditioning syndrome may be best addressed by total body strengthening. Methods Thirteen patients with CLBP were allocated to two groups by block randomization. Group A was the home total body strengthening programme plus manual therapy and group B was the standard physiotherapy exercise regimen plus manual therapy. Both groups received a course of manual therapy and a specific home exercise programme for 3 months. Three outcome measures pre- and post-treatment were used measuring function, pain, and quality of life. Results The treatment programmes in this pilot study were implemented successfully with a dropout rate of 19%. All the outcome measures used in this pilot study were responsive to change. Both groups showed a clinically important difference to function following treatment as well as improvements to pain and health-related quality of life. Conclusion The small sample size was one of the weaknesses of this pilot study. The findings from this pilot study suggest a future RCT is feasible to determine whether a home total body strengthening programme plus manual therapy is an effective management strategy for CLBP.","PeriodicalId":88907,"journal":{"name":"International musculoskeletal medicine","volume":"36 1","pages":"87 - 95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/1753615414Y.0000000034","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International musculoskeletal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1753615414Y.0000000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To conduct a phase II pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing a home total body strengthening programme plus manual therapy with a standard physiotherapy exercise regimen plus manual therapy for the management of non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) and determine the feasibility for a larger RCT. Introduction There is moderate evidence for exercise combined with manual therapy in the treatment of CLBP. Patients with CLBP have decreased muscle power and cardiac capacity due to their low activity levels that leads to a de-conditioning syndrome and pain. This de-conditioning syndrome may be best addressed by total body strengthening. Methods Thirteen patients with CLBP were allocated to two groups by block randomization. Group A was the home total body strengthening programme plus manual therapy and group B was the standard physiotherapy exercise regimen plus manual therapy. Both groups received a course of manual therapy and a specific home exercise programme for 3 months. Three outcome measures pre- and post-treatment were used measuring function, pain, and quality of life. Results The treatment programmes in this pilot study were implemented successfully with a dropout rate of 19%. All the outcome measures used in this pilot study were responsive to change. Both groups showed a clinically important difference to function following treatment as well as improvements to pain and health-related quality of life. Conclusion The small sample size was one of the weaknesses of this pilot study. The findings from this pilot study suggest a future RCT is feasible to determine whether a home total body strengthening programme plus manual therapy is an effective management strategy for CLBP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项II期试点研究,比较家庭全身强化计划加手工疗法与标准物理治疗运动方案加手工疗法在慢性腰痛管理中的作用
目的开展一项II期试点随机对照试验(RCT),比较家庭全身强化方案加手工治疗与标准物理治疗运动方案加手工治疗对非特异性慢性腰痛(CLBP)的治疗效果,并确定开展更大规模RCT的可行性。有中度证据表明,运动联合手工疗法治疗CLBP。CLBP患者由于活动水平低,肌肉力量和心容量下降,导致条件反射综合征和疼痛。这种去调节综合症最好通过全身强化来解决。方法13例CLBP患者采用分组随机法分为两组。A组为家庭全身强化方案加手工疗法,B组为标准物理治疗运动方案加手工疗法。两组均接受为期3个月的手工治疗和特定的家庭锻炼计划。治疗前和治疗后的三个结果测量测量功能、疼痛和生活质量。结果本初步研究的治疗方案成功实施,辍学率为19%。在这项初步研究中使用的所有结果测量指标都对变化有反应。两组在治疗后的功能以及疼痛和健康相关生活质量的改善方面都显示出临床上重要的差异。结论样本量小是本初步研究的不足之一。这项初步研究的结果表明,未来的随机对照试验是可行的,以确定家庭全身强化计划加手工治疗是否是CLBP的有效管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Musculo-skeletal and neurological aspects of Lyme disease Lyme disease: A patient's journey The effectiveness of scapular taping on pain and function in people with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review A pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare a novel group physiotherapy programme with a standard group exercise programme for managing chronic low back pain in primary care End of an era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1