A repeat-measures comparison of the analogue and digital pressure threshold metres: Do they differ in sensitivity?

D. Cashley
{"title":"A repeat-measures comparison of the analogue and digital pressure threshold metres: Do they differ in sensitivity?","authors":"D. Cashley","doi":"10.1179/1753615415Y.0000000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives There has been ample research published to demonstrate the validity and sensitivity of the pressure threshold metre, but none to assess the competence of the analogue metre as compared to the more commonly used digital version. This paper aims to compare the two different types of metre. Method A total of 160 measurements were taken from each metre for comparison. Results A Bland–Altman plot showed the measurements from both metres to be in excellent agreement, while a strong correlation was also evident. Discussion Where changes in excess of 1 kg/cm2 are being sought, both devices perform satisfactorily and there is little or nothing to advance the case for 1 m over the other. Since the minimum clinically significant change is thought to be 1.5 kg/cm either metre should function satisfactorily in the clinical setting.","PeriodicalId":88907,"journal":{"name":"International musculoskeletal medicine","volume":"47 32 1","pages":"72 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/1753615415Y.0000000007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International musculoskeletal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/1753615415Y.0000000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives There has been ample research published to demonstrate the validity and sensitivity of the pressure threshold metre, but none to assess the competence of the analogue metre as compared to the more commonly used digital version. This paper aims to compare the two different types of metre. Method A total of 160 measurements were taken from each metre for comparison. Results A Bland–Altman plot showed the measurements from both metres to be in excellent agreement, while a strong correlation was also evident. Discussion Where changes in excess of 1 kg/cm2 are being sought, both devices perform satisfactorily and there is little or nothing to advance the case for 1 m over the other. Since the minimum clinically significant change is thought to be 1.5 kg/cm either metre should function satisfactorily in the clinical setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟和数字压力阈值表的重复测量比较:它们的灵敏度不同吗?
已经发表了大量的研究来证明压力阈值仪表的有效性和灵敏度,但没有研究来评估模拟仪表与更常用的数字版本相比的能力。本文的目的是比较两种不同类型的拍子。方法每米共采集160次测量数据进行比较。结果Bland-Altman图显示,两米的测量结果非常一致,而强相关性也很明显。当寻求超过1 kg/cm2的变化时,两种装置的性能都令人满意,并且很少或根本没有比另一种装置高出1 m的情况。由于最小的临床显著变化被认为是1.5 kg/cm,因此在临床环境中,任一米都应发挥令人满意的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Musculo-skeletal and neurological aspects of Lyme disease Lyme disease: A patient's journey The effectiveness of scapular taping on pain and function in people with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review A pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare a novel group physiotherapy programme with a standard group exercise programme for managing chronic low back pain in primary care End of an era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1