Efficacy of triple antiemetic therapy (palonosetron, dexamethasone, aprepitant) for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-based, moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Q1 Multidisciplinary SpringerPlus Pub Date : 2016-12-07 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40064-016-3769-x
Toshimichi Miya, Kunihiko Kobayashi, Mitsunori Hino, Masahiro Ando, Susumu Takeuchi, Masahiro Seike, Kaoru Kubota, Akihiko Gemma
{"title":"Efficacy of triple antiemetic therapy (palonosetron, dexamethasone, aprepitant) for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-based, moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.","authors":"Toshimichi Miya, Kunihiko Kobayashi, Mitsunori Hino, Masahiro Ando, Susumu Takeuchi, Masahiro Seike, Kaoru Kubota, Akihiko Gemma","doi":"10.1186/s40064-016-3769-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a major adverse toxicity of cancer chemotherapy. Recommended treatments for prevention of CINV vary among published guidelines, and optimal care for CINV caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy has not been established. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of triple antiemetic therapy comprising palonosetron, dexamethasone and aprepitant for carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-naïve patients with lung cancer scheduled for a first course of a carboplatin-containing regimen formed the study cohort. Patients were pretreated with antiemetic therapy comprising palonosetron (0.75 mg, i.v.) and dexamethasone (9.9 mg, i.v.) on day 1, and aprepitant (125 mg, p.o.) on day 1 followed by 80 mg on days 2 and 3. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who did not experience vomiting and did not require rescue medication [complete response (CR)] in the acute phase (0-24 h), late phase (24-168 h) and overall. Secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients who experienced no vomiting episodes and no more than mild nausea without the need for rescue medication [complete control (CC)].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of a CR during the acute phase, delayed phase, and overall was 100, 91.9 and 91.9%, whereas that of CC was 100, 84.4 and 84.4%, respectively. The most common adverse event was mild constipation; severe adverse events related to antiemetic treatment were not observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Triple antiemetic therapy comprising palonosetron, dexamethasone and aprepitant shows excellent effects in the prevention of CINV in patients receiving a carboplatin-containing regimen.</p>","PeriodicalId":21923,"journal":{"name":"SpringerPlus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5142171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SpringerPlus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3769-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a major adverse toxicity of cancer chemotherapy. Recommended treatments for prevention of CINV vary among published guidelines, and optimal care for CINV caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy has not been established. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of triple antiemetic therapy comprising palonosetron, dexamethasone and aprepitant for carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-naïve patients with lung cancer scheduled for a first course of a carboplatin-containing regimen formed the study cohort. Patients were pretreated with antiemetic therapy comprising palonosetron (0.75 mg, i.v.) and dexamethasone (9.9 mg, i.v.) on day 1, and aprepitant (125 mg, p.o.) on day 1 followed by 80 mg on days 2 and 3. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who did not experience vomiting and did not require rescue medication [complete response (CR)] in the acute phase (0-24 h), late phase (24-168 h) and overall. Secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients who experienced no vomiting episodes and no more than mild nausea without the need for rescue medication [complete control (CC)].

Results: Prevalence of a CR during the acute phase, delayed phase, and overall was 100, 91.9 and 91.9%, whereas that of CC was 100, 84.4 and 84.4%, respectively. The most common adverse event was mild constipation; severe adverse events related to antiemetic treatment were not observed.

Conclusion: Triple antiemetic therapy comprising palonosetron, dexamethasone and aprepitant shows excellent effects in the prevention of CINV in patients receiving a carboplatin-containing regimen.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三联止吐疗法(帕洛诺司琼、地塞米松、阿普瑞坦)对接受以卡铂为基础的中度致吐化疗的患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效。
背景:化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)是癌症化疗的主要不良毒性反应。在已出版的指南中,预防 CINV 的推荐治疗方法各不相同,而针对中度致吐化疗引起的 CINV 的最佳治疗方法尚未确定。本研究评估了由帕洛诺司琼、地塞米松和阿瑞匹坦组成的三联止吐疗法用于卡铂化疗的疗效和安全性。计划接受含卡铂方案第一疗程化疗的肺癌新患者组成了研究队列。患者在化疗前接受止吐治疗,包括第1天服用帕洛诺司琼(0.75毫克,静注)和地塞米松(9.9毫克,静注),第1天服用阿瑞匹坦(125毫克,口服),第2天和第3天服用80毫克。主要终点是在急性期(0-24 小时)、晚期(24-168 小时)和总体上没有出现呕吐且不需要抢救药物的患者比例[完全应答(CR)]。次要终点是无呕吐发作、无轻度恶心且无需使用抢救药物的患者比例[完全控制(CC)]:急性期、延迟期和总的完全控制率分别为 100%、91.9% 和 91.9%,而完全控制率分别为 100%、84.4% 和 84.4%。最常见的不良反应是轻度便秘;未观察到与止吐治疗相关的严重不良反应:结论:由帕洛诺司琼、地塞米松和阿瑞匹坦组成的三联止吐疗法在预防接受含卡铂方案治疗的患者出现CINV方面效果显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SpringerPlus
SpringerPlus MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.76
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cessation
期刊最新文献
Erratum to: Coexistence of contralateral cluster headache and probable paroxysmal hemicrania: a case report Erratum to: Numerical method to compute acoustic scattering effect of a moving source. Erratum to: Associations between adherence, depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life in young adults with cystic fibrosis. Erratum to: Implication of Paris Agreement in the context of long-term climate mitigation goals. Adaptation Processes in Agriculture and Food Security: Insights from Evaluating Behavioral Changes in West Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1