Provider Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.

Q1 Multidisciplinary SpringerPlus Pub Date : 2022-10-14 DOI:10.2196/41940
Barbara Barry, Xuan Zhu, Emma Behnken, Jonathan Inselman, Karen Schaepe, Rozalina McCoy, David Rushlow, Peter Noseworthy, Jordan Richardson, Susan Curtis, Richard Sharp, Artika Misra, Abdulla Akfaly, Paul Molling, Matthew Bernard, Xiaoxi Yao
{"title":"Provider Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Barbara Barry, Xuan Zhu, Emma Behnken, Jonathan Inselman, Karen Schaepe, Rozalina McCoy, David Rushlow, Peter Noseworthy, Jordan Richardson, Susan Curtis, Richard Sharp, Artika Misra, Abdulla Akfaly, Paul Molling, Matthew Bernard, Xiaoxi Yao","doi":"10.2196/41940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The promise of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform health care is threatened by a tangle of challenges that emerge as new AI tools are introduced into clinical practice. AI tools with high accuracy, especially those that detect asymptomatic cases, may be hindered by barriers to adoption. Understanding provider needs and concerns is critical to inform implementation strategies that improve provider buy-in and adoption of AI tools in medicine.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to describe provider perspectives on the adoption of an AI-enabled screening tool in primary care to inform effective integration and sustained use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted between December 2019 and February 2020 as part of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial at a large academic medical center in the United States. In all, 29 primary care providers were purposively sampled using a positive deviance approach for participation in semistructured focus groups after their use of the AI tool in the randomized controlled trial was complete. Focus group data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach; iterative analysis was conducted to identify codes and themes, which were synthesized into findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings revealed that providers understood the purpose and functionality of the AI tool and saw potential value for more accurate and faster diagnoses. However, successful adoption into routine patient care requires the smooth integration of the tool with clinical decision-making and existing workflow to address provider needs and preferences during implementation. To fulfill the AI tool's promise of clinical value, providers identified areas for improvement including integration with clinical decision-making, cost-effectiveness and resource allocation, provider training, workflow integration, care pathway coordination, and provider-patient communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of AI-enabled tools in medicine can benefit from sensitivity to the nuanced context of care and provider needs to enable the useful adoption of AI tools at the point of care.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04000087; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04000087.</p>","PeriodicalId":21923,"journal":{"name":"SpringerPlus","volume":"4 1","pages":"e41940"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SpringerPlus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/41940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The promise of artificial intelligence (AI) to transform health care is threatened by a tangle of challenges that emerge as new AI tools are introduced into clinical practice. AI tools with high accuracy, especially those that detect asymptomatic cases, may be hindered by barriers to adoption. Understanding provider needs and concerns is critical to inform implementation strategies that improve provider buy-in and adoption of AI tools in medicine.

Objective: This study aimed to describe provider perspectives on the adoption of an AI-enabled screening tool in primary care to inform effective integration and sustained use.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted between December 2019 and February 2020 as part of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial at a large academic medical center in the United States. In all, 29 primary care providers were purposively sampled using a positive deviance approach for participation in semistructured focus groups after their use of the AI tool in the randomized controlled trial was complete. Focus group data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach; iterative analysis was conducted to identify codes and themes, which were synthesized into findings.

Results: Our findings revealed that providers understood the purpose and functionality of the AI tool and saw potential value for more accurate and faster diagnoses. However, successful adoption into routine patient care requires the smooth integration of the tool with clinical decision-making and existing workflow to address provider needs and preferences during implementation. To fulfill the AI tool's promise of clinical value, providers identified areas for improvement including integration with clinical decision-making, cost-effectiveness and resource allocation, provider training, workflow integration, care pathway coordination, and provider-patient communication.

Conclusions: The implementation of AI-enabled tools in medicine can benefit from sensitivity to the nuanced context of care and provider needs to enable the useful adoption of AI tools at the point of care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04000087; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04000087.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗服务提供者对人工智能引导的初级医疗低射血分数筛查的看法:定性研究。
背景:随着新的人工智能工具被引入临床实践,人工智能(AI)改变医疗保健的前景受到了一系列挑战的威胁。具有高准确性的人工智能工具,尤其是检测无症状病例的工具,可能会受到采用障碍的阻碍。了解医疗服务提供者的需求和顾虑对于制定实施策略、提高医疗服务提供者对人工智能工具的接受度和采用率至关重要:本研究旨在描述医疗服务提供者对在初级医疗中采用人工智能筛查工具的看法,以便为有效整合和持续使用提供信息:2019年12月至2020年2月期间,在美国一家大型学术医疗中心开展了一项定性研究,作为实用随机对照试验的一部分。在随机对照试验中使用人工智能工具结束后,采用正偏差法有目的地抽取了 29 名初级保健提供者参加半结构化焦点小组。焦点小组的数据采用基础理论方法进行分析;通过迭代分析确定代码和主题,并将其综合为研究结果:结果:我们的研究结果表明,医疗服务提供者了解人工智能工具的目的和功能,并认为它具有更准确、更快速诊断的潜在价值。然而,要成功地将人工智能工具应用到常规患者护理中,还需要将其与临床决策和现有工作流程顺利整合,以满足医疗服务提供者在实施过程中的需求和偏好。为了实现人工智能工具的临床价值承诺,医疗服务提供者指出了需要改进的方面,包括与临床决策的整合、成本效益和资源分配、医疗服务提供者培训、工作流程整合、护理路径协调以及医疗服务提供者与患者之间的沟通:结论:在医疗领域实施人工智能工具,可以从对细微的医疗环境和医疗服务提供者需求的敏感性中获益,从而使人工智能工具在医疗点得到有效采用:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04000087; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04000087.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SpringerPlus
SpringerPlus MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.76
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cessation
期刊最新文献
Provider Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Guided Screening for Low Ejection Fraction in Primary Care: Qualitative Study. Erratum to: Coexistence of contralateral cluster headache and probable paroxysmal hemicrania: a case report Erratum to: Numerical method to compute acoustic scattering effect of a moving source. Erratum to: Associations between adherence, depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life in young adults with cystic fibrosis. Erratum to: Implication of Paris Agreement in the context of long-term climate mitigation goals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1