Long-term development of experimental mixtures of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) in northern Britain

B. Mason, T. Connolly
{"title":"Long-term development of experimental mixtures of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) in northern Britain","authors":"B. Mason, T. Connolly","doi":"10.12899/ASR-1119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Caledonian pinewoods of northern Scotland are a priority conservation habitat in Europe which are dominated by Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris) , but varying proportions of a number of broadleaved species such as silver birch ( Betula pendula) can occur in these forests. Better understanding of the dynamics of mixed Scots pine-birch stands would be helpful in informing current initiatives to restore and increase the area of the pinewood ecosystem. Some evidence is provided by two experiments established in the 1960s which compared plots of pure Scots pine and pure birch with two treatments where the two species were mixed in 3:1 and 1:1 ratios. Some fifty years later, Scots pine was the more vigorous of the two species in these experiments, being both taller and significantly larger in diameter. The highest basal area was generally found in the pure Scots pine plots and the values in the mixed plots tended to be intermediate between those of the two component species. Examination of the growth in the mixed plots showed a slight, but non-significant, tendency towards overyielding. This appeared to be due to Scots pine growth being better than predicted, while that of birch was slightly less than predicted. These results suggest that in these mixtures, which are composed of two light demanding species, the main mechanism driving long-term performance is competition for light and there is little evidence of any complementary effect. These results suggest that any strategy seeking to increase the long-term representation of broadleaves such as birch in the Caledonian pinewoods will need to create discrete blocks that are large enough to withstand the competitive pressures exerted by the pine.","PeriodicalId":37733,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Silvicultural Research","volume":"34 1","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Silvicultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12899/ASR-1119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Caledonian pinewoods of northern Scotland are a priority conservation habitat in Europe which are dominated by Scots pine ( Pinus sylvestris) , but varying proportions of a number of broadleaved species such as silver birch ( Betula pendula) can occur in these forests. Better understanding of the dynamics of mixed Scots pine-birch stands would be helpful in informing current initiatives to restore and increase the area of the pinewood ecosystem. Some evidence is provided by two experiments established in the 1960s which compared plots of pure Scots pine and pure birch with two treatments where the two species were mixed in 3:1 and 1:1 ratios. Some fifty years later, Scots pine was the more vigorous of the two species in these experiments, being both taller and significantly larger in diameter. The highest basal area was generally found in the pure Scots pine plots and the values in the mixed plots tended to be intermediate between those of the two component species. Examination of the growth in the mixed plots showed a slight, but non-significant, tendency towards overyielding. This appeared to be due to Scots pine growth being better than predicted, while that of birch was slightly less than predicted. These results suggest that in these mixtures, which are composed of two light demanding species, the main mechanism driving long-term performance is competition for light and there is little evidence of any complementary effect. These results suggest that any strategy seeking to increase the long-term representation of broadleaves such as birch in the Caledonian pinewoods will need to create discrete blocks that are large enough to withstand the competitive pressures exerted by the pine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国北部苏格兰松(Pinus sylvestris L.)与白桦(Betula pendula Roth.)混合试验的长期开发
苏格兰北部的喀里多尼亚松林是欧洲的优先保护栖息地,以苏格兰松(Pinus sylvestris)为主,但在这些森林中可以出现不同比例的阔叶物种,如白桦(Betula pendula)。更好地了解苏格兰松桦林混合林的动态将有助于为当前恢复和增加松木生态系统面积的举措提供信息。20世纪60年代建立的两个实验提供了一些证据,该实验比较了纯苏格兰松和纯桦树的两种处理方式,两种树种以3:1和1:1的比例混合。大约五十年后,在这些实验中,苏格兰松是两个物种中更有活力的,既更高,直径也大得多。纯样地的基底面积最高,混合样地的基底面积介于两种成分种之间。对混交地的生长检查显示有轻微但不显著的超产趋势。这似乎是由于苏格兰松的生长比预测的要好,而桦树的生长略低于预测。这些结果表明,在这些由两种光需求物种组成的混合物中,驱动长期表现的主要机制是对光的竞争,几乎没有证据表明存在任何互补效应。这些结果表明,任何寻求在加里东松林中增加阔叶(如桦树)长期代表性的策略,都需要创建足够大的离散块,以承受松树施加的竞争压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Silvicultural Research
Annals of Silvicultural Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of TLS against traditional surveying method for stem taper modelling. A case study in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests of mount Amiata Lessons learned from the past: forestry initiatives for effective carbon stocking in Southern Italy Towards a comprehensive development of eco-innovation indicators in forestry sector: an application in the Italian Alps Gaps and perspectives for the improvement of the sweet chestnut forest-wood chain in Italy The diversity of termite species on natural forest and agroforestry land in Sulawesi tropical forests in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1