Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Compassion Satisfaction of Military Officers Responding to COVID-19

Seoyoung Baek, Sinwoo Hwang
{"title":"Burnout, Secondary Traumatic Stress, and Compassion Satisfaction of Military Officers Responding to COVID-19","authors":"Seoyoung Baek, Sinwoo Hwang","doi":"10.12799/jkachn.2022.33.2.217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify individual and occupational factors influencing burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction in military officers who experienced supporting civilians in responding to COVID-19. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted on 140 special forces’ military officers who experienced responding to disasters within 3 months. Data were collected through an online survey from September to November 2021. Results: The mean scores for burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction were 21.67±6.03, 20.54±8.21, and 39.72±8.12 out of 50, respectively. The significant factors that influenced burnout and secondary traumatic stress were ‘higher passive stress copying styles’ (B=0.17, p<.001;B=0.31, p=<.001, respectively) and ‘lower social support (B=-0.11, p=.031;B=-0.10, p=.001, respectively). The compassion satisfaction was more significantly associated with ‘higher self-efficacy’ (B=0.37, p=<.001), ‘higher active stress copying styles’ (B=0.19, p=.006), and ‘education responding to disasters’ (B=2.04, p=.029). Conclusion: The results suggest that the strategies to increase social support, self-efficacy, and active stress coping styles should be considered in developing educational programs for military officers responding to disasters to minimize burnout, secondary traumatic stress and to improve compassion satisfaction. © 2022. Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing","PeriodicalId":37541,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2022.33.2.217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify individual and occupational factors influencing burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction in military officers who experienced supporting civilians in responding to COVID-19. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted on 140 special forces’ military officers who experienced responding to disasters within 3 months. Data were collected through an online survey from September to November 2021. Results: The mean scores for burnout, secondary traumatic stress, and compassion satisfaction were 21.67±6.03, 20.54±8.21, and 39.72±8.12 out of 50, respectively. The significant factors that influenced burnout and secondary traumatic stress were ‘higher passive stress copying styles’ (B=0.17, p<.001;B=0.31, p=<.001, respectively) and ‘lower social support (B=-0.11, p=.031;B=-0.10, p=.001, respectively). The compassion satisfaction was more significantly associated with ‘higher self-efficacy’ (B=0.37, p=<.001), ‘higher active stress copying styles’ (B=0.19, p=.006), and ‘education responding to disasters’ (B=2.04, p=.029). Conclusion: The results suggest that the strategies to increase social support, self-efficacy, and active stress coping styles should be considered in developing educational programs for military officers responding to disasters to minimize burnout, secondary traumatic stress and to improve compassion satisfaction. © 2022. Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
军官应对COVID-19的职业倦怠、继发性创伤压力和同情心满意度
目的:本研究的目的是确定影响支持平民应对COVID-19的军官倦怠、继发性创伤应激和同情满意度的个人和职业因素。方法:对140名在3个月内经历过灾害应对的特种部队军官进行描述性研究。数据是通过2021年9月至11月的在线调查收集的。结果:倦怠、继发性创伤应激和同情满意度的平均得分分别为21.67±6.03分、20.54±8.21分和39.72±8.12分。影响职业倦怠和继发性创伤应激的显著因素为“较高的被动应激复制方式”(B=0.17, p< 0.001)和“B=0.31, p=< 0.001”。(B=-0.11, p= 0.031;B=-0.10, p= 0.031;001年,分别)。同情心满意度与“较高的自我效能感”(B=0.37, p=< 0.001)、“较高的主动压力复制风格”(B=0.19, p= 0.006)和“应对灾难的教育”(B=2.04, p= 0.029)的关系更为显著。结论:军官灾害应对教育应考虑提高社会支持、自我效能感和积极应对压力的策略,以减少倦怠、二次创伤应激和提高同情满意度。©2022。韩国社区保健护理学会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing is the official journal of the Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. This journal aims to provide worldwide access to tilmely research and practice feature of use to community health nurses, educators, school health teachers, occupational nurses, and administrators in the field of community health nursing. JKACHN coverage includes theoretical, practical, and educational issues related to community health nursing. Articles include original research articles, reviews, editorials.
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in Older Adults’ Muscle Strength and Depressive Symptoms: A Relationship Mediated Through Perceived Stress The Effect of Dual Sensory Impairment on Cognitive Function Decline in the Elderly: The Moderating Effect of Social Support Effects of Fatigue and Emotional Labor on Sleep Quality among Apartment Security Guards Factors Affecting the Performance of Infection Control of Multi-drug Resistant Organisms in Intensive Care Unit Nurses of General Hospitals based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Intention A Structural Equation Model on Health Status in Delivery Workers: Based on the Theory of Salutogenesis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1