The “public field” after the establishment of the national curriculum guidelines for the undergraduate teaching in public administration: trajectory and current challenges (2015-2020)

IF 0.4 Q4 MANAGEMENT Administracao-Ensino e Pesquisa Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.13058/raep.2020.v21n3.1897
Fernando de Souza Coelho, Lindijane de Souza Bento Almeida, Suylan Midlej, P. Schommer, M. Teixeira
{"title":"The “public field” after the establishment of the national curriculum guidelines for the undergraduate teaching in public administration: trajectory and current challenges (2015-2020)","authors":"Fernando de Souza Coelho, Lindijane de Souza Bento Almeida, Suylan Midlej, P. Schommer, M. Teixeira","doi":"10.13058/raep.2020.v21n3.1897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The year 2020 marks ten years since the term “Public Field” was introduced in Brazil. Professors and students of undergraduate programs in public administration, public management, and public policy were the first to adopt the term, which emerged at a public hearing of the National Education Council on April 5, 2010, held to discuss the preparation of the National Curriculum Guidelines (NCG) for public administration undergraduate programs. There are many books and articles about the history of public administration education in Brazil, discussing its various cycles since 1952 and the movement to redefine the identity of higher education in this field of knowledge, which resulted in the establishment of the NCG in 2014. During the period 2015-2020, the Public Field in Brazil witnessed the establishment of representative entities, the process of implementing the NCG, the creation of specific scientific events, the preparation of the National Student Performance Exam (Enade) for public administration students, the elaboration of publications with titles related to the Public Field, and the formation of a multidisciplinary academic community. However, there is no systematization of this period of institutionalization. This article addresses this gap, describing this recent history and analyzing the current challenges of the Public Field. First, we carried out a comparative analysis of literature and documents to reveal the milestones of the public field and its challenges after the implementation of the NCG. Then, we conducted a survey with 365 valid responses, where professors, researchers, students, and alumni related to the Public Field prioritized the challenges presented. The outcome of this research is an overview of the construction of the Public Field in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":53951,"journal":{"name":"Administracao-Ensino e Pesquisa","volume":"21 1","pages":"488-529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administracao-Ensino e Pesquisa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2020.v21n3.1897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The year 2020 marks ten years since the term “Public Field” was introduced in Brazil. Professors and students of undergraduate programs in public administration, public management, and public policy were the first to adopt the term, which emerged at a public hearing of the National Education Council on April 5, 2010, held to discuss the preparation of the National Curriculum Guidelines (NCG) for public administration undergraduate programs. There are many books and articles about the history of public administration education in Brazil, discussing its various cycles since 1952 and the movement to redefine the identity of higher education in this field of knowledge, which resulted in the establishment of the NCG in 2014. During the period 2015-2020, the Public Field in Brazil witnessed the establishment of representative entities, the process of implementing the NCG, the creation of specific scientific events, the preparation of the National Student Performance Exam (Enade) for public administration students, the elaboration of publications with titles related to the Public Field, and the formation of a multidisciplinary academic community. However, there is no systematization of this period of institutionalization. This article addresses this gap, describing this recent history and analyzing the current challenges of the Public Field. First, we carried out a comparative analysis of literature and documents to reveal the milestones of the public field and its challenges after the implementation of the NCG. Then, we conducted a survey with 365 valid responses, where professors, researchers, students, and alumni related to the Public Field prioritized the challenges presented. The outcome of this research is an overview of the construction of the Public Field in Brazil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家公共管理本科课程指南制定后的“公共场域”:轨迹与当前挑战(2015-2020)
2020年是巴西引入“公共领域”一词的十周年。2010年4月5日,在国立教育委员会为讨论制定《国家行政本科课程指南》而举行的听证会上,首次使用了行政、公共管理、公共政策专业的教授和学生。有很多关于巴西公共管理教育历史的书籍和文章,讨论了自1952年以来的各种周期,以及重新定义这一知识领域高等教育身份的运动,这导致了2014年NCG的成立。在2015-2020年期间,巴西的公共领域见证了代表性实体的建立、NCG的实施过程、特定科学活动的创建、面向公共管理专业学生的国家学生表现考试(Enade)的准备、与公共领域相关标题的出版物的编写以及多学科学术共同体的形成。然而,这一制度化时期并没有系统化。本文解决了这一差距,描述了这一最近的历史,并分析了公共领域当前的挑战。首先,我们对文献和文件进行了比较分析,以揭示实施NCG后公共领域的里程碑及其挑战。然后,我们进行了一项有365个有效回复的调查,与公共领域相关的教授、研究人员、学生和校友优先考虑所面临的挑战。本研究的结果是对巴西公共领域建设的概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alfabetização científica e tecnológica e a educação em saúde: um estudo sobre a produção científica no cenário brasileiro Editorial Estruturas Essenciais de Metodologias Ativas: Um Estudo no Segmento de Educação Corporativa Influência da Qualificação Docente Sobre o Desempenho Discente no Enem “Como uma pedra a rolar”: de ‘bico’ à profissionalização da GEOFORTES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1