Evaluating the bond strength of FRP in concrete samples using machine learning methods

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Smart Structures and Systems Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.12989/SSS.2020.26.4.403
Juncheng Gao, Mohammadreza Koopialipoor, D. J. Armaghani, Aria Ghabussi, S. Baharom, Armin Morasaei, A. Shariati, M. Khorami, Jian Zhou
{"title":"Evaluating the bond strength of FRP in concrete samples using machine learning methods","authors":"Juncheng Gao, Mohammadreza Koopialipoor, D. J. Armaghani, Aria Ghabussi, S. Baharom, Armin Morasaei, A. Shariati, M. Khorami, Jian Zhou","doi":"10.12989/SSS.2020.26.4.403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the use of Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) as one of the most common ways to increase the strength of concrete samples, has been introduced. Evaluation of the final strength of these specimens is performed with different experimental methods. In this research, due to the variety of models, the low accuracy and impact of different parameters, the use of new intelligence methods is considered. Therefore, using artificial intelligent-based models, a new solution for evaluating the bond strength of FRP is presented in this paper. 150 experimental samples were collected from previous studies, and then two new hybrid models of Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA)-Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Artificial Bee Colony (ABC)-ANN were developed. These models were evaluated using different performance indices and then, a comparison was made between the developed models. The results showed that the ICA-ANN model's ability to predict the bond strength of FRP is higher than the ABC-ANN model. Finally, to demonstrate the capabilities of this new model, a comparison was made between the five experimental models and the results were presented for all data. This comparison showed that the new model could offer better performance. It is concluded that the proposed hybrid models can be utilized in the field of this study as a suitable substitute for empirical models.","PeriodicalId":51155,"journal":{"name":"Smart Structures and Systems","volume":"26 1","pages":"403-418"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"35","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Structures and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12989/SSS.2020.26.4.403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

Abstract

In recent years, the use of Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) as one of the most common ways to increase the strength of concrete samples, has been introduced. Evaluation of the final strength of these specimens is performed with different experimental methods. In this research, due to the variety of models, the low accuracy and impact of different parameters, the use of new intelligence methods is considered. Therefore, using artificial intelligent-based models, a new solution for evaluating the bond strength of FRP is presented in this paper. 150 experimental samples were collected from previous studies, and then two new hybrid models of Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA)-Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Artificial Bee Colony (ABC)-ANN were developed. These models were evaluated using different performance indices and then, a comparison was made between the developed models. The results showed that the ICA-ANN model's ability to predict the bond strength of FRP is higher than the ABC-ANN model. Finally, to demonstrate the capabilities of this new model, a comparison was made between the five experimental models and the results were presented for all data. This comparison showed that the new model could offer better performance. It is concluded that the proposed hybrid models can be utilized in the field of this study as a suitable substitute for empirical models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习方法评估FRP在混凝土样品中的粘结强度
近年来,纤维增强聚合物(frp)作为提高混凝土样品强度的最常用方法之一被引入。用不同的实验方法对这些试件的最终强度进行了评估。在本研究中,由于模型的多样性,精度低和不同参数的影响,考虑了新的智能方法的使用。因此,本文采用基于人工智能的模型,提出了一种评估FRP粘结强度的新方法。在150个实验样本的基础上,建立了帝国主义竞争算法(ICA)-人工神经网络(ANN)和人工蜂群(ABC)-人工神经网络(ANN)的混合模型。采用不同的性能指标对这些模型进行评价,并与已开发的模型进行比较。结果表明,ICA-ANN模型对FRP粘结强度的预测能力高于ABC-ANN模型。最后,为了证明新模型的能力,对五个实验模型进行了比较,并给出了所有数据的结果。通过比较表明,新模型可以提供更好的性能。结果表明,本文提出的混合模型可以作为经验模型的合适替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Structures and Systems
Smart Structures and Systems 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: An International Journal of Mechatronics, Sensors, Monitoring, Control, Diagnosis, and Management airns at providing a major publication channel for researchers in the general area of smart structures and systems. Typical subjects considered by the journal include: Sensors/Actuators(Materials/devices/ informatics/networking) Structural Health Monitoring and Control Diagnosis/Prognosis Life Cycle Engineering(planning/design/ maintenance/renewal) and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Analysis, optimization and control of an adaptive tuned vibration absorber featuring magnetoactive materials Numerical investigation on cyclic behaviour of superelastic shape memory alloy (SMA) dampers Hybrid fragility curve derivation of buildings based on post-earthquake reconnaissance data A corrosion threshold-controllable sensing system of Fe-C coated long period fiber gratings for life-cycle mass loss measurement of steel bars with strain and temperature compensation Steel dual-ring dampers: Micro-finite element modelling and validation of cyclic behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1