OMITTING THE STATIC COMPONENT FROM DESIGN DYNAMIC MODELS OF PEDESTRIAN LOAD

I. Š. Grandić
{"title":"OMITTING THE STATIC COMPONENT FROM DESIGN DYNAMIC MODELS OF PEDESTRIAN LOAD","authors":"I. Š. Grandić","doi":"10.13167/2014.9.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Serviceability limit state (SLS) due to pedestrian-induced vibrations should be checked for bridges with fundamental natural frequency less than 5 Hz. In those cases the vibration serviceability requirement should be fulfilled. In current codes and designer´s guidelines the vibration serviceability requirement is determined as a pedestrian comfort criteria thought terms of maximum acceptable acceleration of any part of the bridge deck, although the comfort criteria can be defined as maximum acceptable deflection or velocity at the most unfavourable part of the bridge deck. The design models of dynamic pedestrian load for SLS verification are based on the experimental models of dynamic pedestrian load, but a static component (pedestrian weight) is omitted from the design models of pedestrian load in vertical direction. Justification of omitting the static component from design models is studied through comparison of dynamic response of different single span bridge deck structures with frequency of 2 Hz to design and experimental pedestrian load models. From conducted numerical analysis and comparison of structural response to design and experimental load models it is shown that omitting of the static component is entirely proper in cases when comfort criteria is based on terms of maximum acceptable bridge deck velocity or acceleration.","PeriodicalId":53887,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS","volume":"9 1","pages":"11-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the Faculty of Civil Engineering Osijek-e-GFOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13167/2014.9.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serviceability limit state (SLS) due to pedestrian-induced vibrations should be checked for bridges with fundamental natural frequency less than 5 Hz. In those cases the vibration serviceability requirement should be fulfilled. In current codes and designer´s guidelines the vibration serviceability requirement is determined as a pedestrian comfort criteria thought terms of maximum acceptable acceleration of any part of the bridge deck, although the comfort criteria can be defined as maximum acceptable deflection or velocity at the most unfavourable part of the bridge deck. The design models of dynamic pedestrian load for SLS verification are based on the experimental models of dynamic pedestrian load, but a static component (pedestrian weight) is omitted from the design models of pedestrian load in vertical direction. Justification of omitting the static component from design models is studied through comparison of dynamic response of different single span bridge deck structures with frequency of 2 Hz to design and experimental pedestrian load models. From conducted numerical analysis and comparison of structural response to design and experimental load models it is shown that omitting of the static component is entirely proper in cases when comfort criteria is based on terms of maximum acceptable bridge deck velocity or acceleration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从行人荷载的动态模型中省略静态分量
对于基本固有频率小于5hz的桥梁,应检查行人振动引起的使用能力极限状态(SLS)。在这些情况下,应满足振动适用性要求。在现行规范和设计指南中,振动适用性要求被确定为行人舒适标准,考虑桥面任何部分的最大可接受加速度,尽管舒适标准可以定义为桥面最不利部分的最大可接受挠度或速度。用于SLS验证的动态行人荷载设计模型是基于动态行人荷载的实验模型,但在垂直方向的行人荷载设计模型中忽略了静态分量(行人重量)。通过比较频率为2 Hz的不同单跨桥面结构在设计和试验行人荷载模型下的动力响应,研究了设计模型中省略静力分量的合理性。从所进行的数值分析和结构对设计和实验荷载模型的响应比较中可以看出,当舒适性标准以最大可接受的桥面速度或加速度为基础时,忽略静力分量是完全合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gender Differences in the Achievements of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy Students Buckling of Concrete Panels under biaxial compression according to Rheological-Dynamical Theory Analysis of the effects of land consolidation.<br> Case study: Šašinci Interaction Surfaces for Post-Fire Analysis Based on Minkowski Sum NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF FLUSHING TIME IN SMALL MARINAS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1