Sabry Musa's Lord of the Spinach Field (1987): A Critique of Post-Colonial Utopianism

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES Arab Studies Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.13169/arabstudquar.43.3.0230
Marwa Essam, Eldin Fahmy Alkhayat, Eldin Fahmy
{"title":"Sabry Musa's Lord of the Spinach Field (1987): A Critique of Post-Colonial Utopianism","authors":"Marwa Essam, Eldin Fahmy Alkhayat, Eldin Fahmy","doi":"10.13169/arabstudquar.43.3.0230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The present study examines the aesthetic features of Sabry Musa’s Lord of the Spinach Field (1987) through Karl-heinz Bohrer’s “Utopia of the Subject” to foreground homo’s quest for a wished-for yet unattainable reality. Post-Colonial Utopianism depicts man’s inner turmoil to force an act of willful rethinking to enhance the “anticipatory con-sciousness” of a better life, a point interrogated within Ernst Bloch’s Principle of Hope to propose the concept of the “Not-Yet-Become”: the not realized futuristic reality. Therefore, the interest is in utopia/dystopia historicities as analytical markers of historical inquiry to analyze specific space/time coordinates; post-colonial pitfalls of a techno-science dystopia. As such, the remarkable characteristic of Post-Colonial Utopianism is critique, and “Subjective Utopia” strives to achieve a breach in the teleological ideology of historical structures; thereby, transformation is the central aesthetic strategy of post-colonial critique.","PeriodicalId":44343,"journal":{"name":"Arab Studies Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Studies Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/arabstudquar.43.3.0230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The present study examines the aesthetic features of Sabry Musa’s Lord of the Spinach Field (1987) through Karl-heinz Bohrer’s “Utopia of the Subject” to foreground homo’s quest for a wished-for yet unattainable reality. Post-Colonial Utopianism depicts man’s inner turmoil to force an act of willful rethinking to enhance the “anticipatory con-sciousness” of a better life, a point interrogated within Ernst Bloch’s Principle of Hope to propose the concept of the “Not-Yet-Become”: the not realized futuristic reality. Therefore, the interest is in utopia/dystopia historicities as analytical markers of historical inquiry to analyze specific space/time coordinates; post-colonial pitfalls of a techno-science dystopia. As such, the remarkable characteristic of Post-Colonial Utopianism is critique, and “Subjective Utopia” strives to achieve a breach in the teleological ideology of historical structures; thereby, transformation is the central aesthetic strategy of post-colonial critique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萨布里·穆萨的《菠菜田之主》(1987):对后殖民乌托邦主义的批判
本研究通过卡尔-海因茨·玻尔的“主体的乌托邦”来考察萨布里·穆萨的《菠菜田的领主》(1987)的美学特征,以展望人类对渴望但无法实现的现实的追求。后殖民乌托邦主义描绘了人类内心的动荡,迫使人们进行任性的反思,以增强对美好生活的“预期意识”,这一点在恩斯特·布洛赫的《希望原理》中提出了“尚未成为”的概念:未实现的未来现实。因此,我们的兴趣在于将乌托邦/反乌托邦的历史性作为历史探究的分析标记,以分析特定的空间/时间坐标;科技反乌托邦的后殖民陷阱。因此,后殖民乌托邦主义的显著特征是批判,“主观乌托邦”力图突破历史结构的目的论意识形态;因此,转型是后殖民批判的核心美学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Studies Quarterly
Arab Studies Quarterly AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Black Day – Palestine Germany’s Never-Ending Guilt Trip Exile Songwriters of the Palestinian Revolution (and the Problem with Sugar Man) The Rise and Fall of Postcolonial Charisma Amr Goes to Hollywood
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1