Spaces of Racialization: Ireland’s Direct Provision Asylum Centres as Sites of Racialized State Violence

IF 1.5 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE State Crime Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.13169/statecrime.11.1.0052
R. Lenṭin
{"title":"Spaces of Racialization: Ireland’s Direct Provision Asylum Centres as Sites of Racialized State Violence","authors":"R. Lenṭin","doi":"10.13169/statecrime.11.1.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since November 1999, people arriving in Ireland to seek asylum have been dispersed throughout the country and confined in Direct Provision (DP) accommodation centres. Though initially meant for a six-month stay, by May 2020 7,700 people were living in 85 DP and emergency accommodation centres, many of them for up to nine years. The centres are operated by for-profit private companies who have been paid 1.6 billion euros since 2000, and are mostly sited in remote locations outside cities, on the periphery of society. The confinement of asylum seekers has been disavowed by state and society and continues the disavowal by Irish state and society of the coercive confinement of unwed mothers and poor children in church-run institutions, where women and children were confined and enslaved until late in the twentieth century. This article is based on interviews with and publicly available testimonies of asylum seekers in Direct Provision and on public and social media statements by the Movement of Asylum Seekers in Ireland (MASI). It theorizes the DP centres as racialized zones of nonbeing (Fanon 1967: 8) and the DP regime as racialized state violence. The segregation and racialization of asylum seekers in Direct Provision were poignantly demonstrated by asylum seekers’ inability to observe social distancing in overcrowded DP centres during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, leading to a considerable number of them being infected.","PeriodicalId":42457,"journal":{"name":"State Crime","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State Crime","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/statecrime.11.1.0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since November 1999, people arriving in Ireland to seek asylum have been dispersed throughout the country and confined in Direct Provision (DP) accommodation centres. Though initially meant for a six-month stay, by May 2020 7,700 people were living in 85 DP and emergency accommodation centres, many of them for up to nine years. The centres are operated by for-profit private companies who have been paid 1.6 billion euros since 2000, and are mostly sited in remote locations outside cities, on the periphery of society. The confinement of asylum seekers has been disavowed by state and society and continues the disavowal by Irish state and society of the coercive confinement of unwed mothers and poor children in church-run institutions, where women and children were confined and enslaved until late in the twentieth century. This article is based on interviews with and publicly available testimonies of asylum seekers in Direct Provision and on public and social media statements by the Movement of Asylum Seekers in Ireland (MASI). It theorizes the DP centres as racialized zones of nonbeing (Fanon 1967: 8) and the DP regime as racialized state violence. The segregation and racialization of asylum seekers in Direct Provision were poignantly demonstrated by asylum seekers’ inability to observe social distancing in overcrowded DP centres during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, leading to a considerable number of them being infected.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族化的空间:爱尔兰直接提供庇护中心作为种族化国家暴力的场所
自1999年11月以来,抵达爱尔兰寻求庇护的人分散在全国各地,并被限制在直接提供住宿中心。虽然最初计划停留6个月,但到2020年5月,有7 700人住在85个难民安置中心和紧急住宿中心,其中许多人的停留时间长达9年。这些中心由营利性私营公司运营,自2000年以来,这些公司已经获得了16亿欧元的收入,它们大多位于城市以外的偏远地区,处于社会的边缘。国家和社会否认对寻求庇护者的监禁,爱尔兰国家和社会继续否认将未婚母亲和贫穷儿童强制监禁在教会管理的机构中,妇女和儿童在这些机构中被监禁和奴役,直到二十世纪后期。本文基于对《直接条款》中寻求庇护者的采访和公开证词,以及爱尔兰寻求庇护者运动(MASI)在公开和社交媒体上的声明。它将民主党中心理论化为非存在的种族化区域(Fanon 1967: 8),将民主党政权理论化为种族化的国家暴力。在Covid-19大流行的早期,寻求庇护者无法在拥挤的难民中心保持社交距离,导致相当多的人被感染,这尖锐地证明了直接提供中的寻求庇护者的隔离和种族化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
State Crime
State Crime POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
Operation Gukurahundi: A Policy of Genocidal Rape and Sexual Violence in Zimbabwe 1983–1984 Operation Gukurahundi: A Policy of Genocidal Rape and Sexual Violence in Zimbabwe 1983–1984 It was the anarchists: The quest for the truth about Italy’s bombs “We will give our blood, but not our land!”—Repertoires of resistance and state-organized land-grabbing at a Bangladeshi tea plantation Ransomware through the lens of state crime
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1