Lifetime trajectories of socio-economic adversity and their associations with psychosocial factors and attitudes towards social class

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1332/175795919x15717233852148
A. Kok, M. Huisman, R. Cooper, T. Cosco, D. Deeg, D. Kuh, M. Stafford
{"title":"Lifetime trajectories of socio-economic adversity and their associations with psychosocial factors and attitudes towards social class","authors":"A. Kok, M. Huisman, R. Cooper, T. Cosco, D. Deeg, D. Kuh, M. Stafford","doi":"10.1332/175795919x15717233852148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Authors 2020. Scientific understanding of the associations between socio-economic adversity and other domains such as health and psychosocial functioning may be improved by employing extensive, prospective life course data to model inter-individual heterogeneity in socio-economic trajectories. This study applied Latent Class Growth Analysis to derive a typology of trajectories of socio-economic adversity, and compared the psychosocial profiles of the groups based on this typology. Data were used from 2,950 men and women participating in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development in Great Britain, ascertained prospectively since birth in 1946 until age 53. Trajectories of socio-economic adversity were based on indicators of occupational class, overcrowding, housing tenure, household amenities and financial hardship at ages 4, 11, 15, 36, 43 and 53, and education at age 26. Psychosocial factors included parental interest in education, self-management, neuroticism and attitudes towards social class and social mobility. Seven distinct trajectories were identified: persistent high; persistent low; strongly declining; gradually declining; increasing; early childhood; and relapsing high adversity. Key findings include that those with increasing adversity had high parental interest in education but low self-management and high neuroticism; that those with only early childhood adversity had a less favourable psychosocial profile than those with persistent low exposure; and that groups with declining adversity had relatively favourable attitudes towards education. Findings emphasise the need to consider socio-economic and personality mechanisms in the context of one another in order to better understand later life inequality.","PeriodicalId":45988,"journal":{"name":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"81-104"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/175795919x15717233852148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

© Authors 2020. Scientific understanding of the associations between socio-economic adversity and other domains such as health and psychosocial functioning may be improved by employing extensive, prospective life course data to model inter-individual heterogeneity in socio-economic trajectories. This study applied Latent Class Growth Analysis to derive a typology of trajectories of socio-economic adversity, and compared the psychosocial profiles of the groups based on this typology. Data were used from 2,950 men and women participating in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development in Great Britain, ascertained prospectively since birth in 1946 until age 53. Trajectories of socio-economic adversity were based on indicators of occupational class, overcrowding, housing tenure, household amenities and financial hardship at ages 4, 11, 15, 36, 43 and 53, and education at age 26. Psychosocial factors included parental interest in education, self-management, neuroticism and attitudes towards social class and social mobility. Seven distinct trajectories were identified: persistent high; persistent low; strongly declining; gradually declining; increasing; early childhood; and relapsing high adversity. Key findings include that those with increasing adversity had high parental interest in education but low self-management and high neuroticism; that those with only early childhood adversity had a less favourable psychosocial profile than those with persistent low exposure; and that groups with declining adversity had relatively favourable attitudes towards education. Findings emphasise the need to consider socio-economic and personality mechanisms in the context of one another in order to better understand later life inequality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会经济逆境的一生轨迹及其与社会心理因素和社会阶层态度的关系
©作者2020。对社会经济逆境与健康和社会心理功能等其他领域之间的关联的科学理解可以通过采用广泛的前瞻性生命历程数据来模拟社会经济轨迹中的个体间异质性来改进。本研究应用潜在阶级增长分析来推导社会经济逆境轨迹的类型学,并在此类型学的基础上比较了群体的社会心理特征。数据来自2950名参加英国MRC健康与发展全国调查的男性和女性,从1946年出生到53岁。社会经济逆境的轨迹基于4岁、11岁、15岁、36岁、43岁和53岁时的职业等级、过度拥挤、住房使用权、家庭设施和经济困难指标,以及26岁时的教育水平。社会心理因素包括父母对教育的兴趣、自我管理、神经质以及对社会阶层和社会流动的态度。确定了七种不同的轨迹:持续高位;持续的低;强烈的下降;逐渐下降;增加;早期的童年;和反复的高逆境。主要发现包括:逆境增加的孩子父母对教育的兴趣高,但自我管理能力低,神经质程度高;那些只有童年早期逆境的人比那些持续低暴露的人有更不利的社会心理特征;逆境减少的群体对教育的态度相对有利。研究结果强调,为了更好地理解晚年生活的不平等,需要在彼此的背景下考虑社会经济和人格机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
January 2025 editorial: don't look away. The effect of childhood socioeconomic status on adult self-rated health by age and race. Corrigendum to Editorial, Vol 15, Issue 4 (October 2024). Longitudinal association between social participation and trajectories of life satisfaction in late middle-aged Korean adults with physical disabilities. The OHC penalty in the UK: maternal experience and child development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1