Stability and mobility in occupational career patterns over 36 years in Swiss women and men

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1332/175795921X16137663687028
Kurt Häfeli, A. Hättich, C. Schellenberg, A. Krauss, G. Ritschard
{"title":"Stability and mobility in occupational career patterns over 36 years in Swiss women and men","authors":"Kurt Häfeli, A. Hättich, C. Schellenberg, A. Krauss, G. Ritschard","doi":"10.1332/175795921X16137663687028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is an open empirical question whether occupational trajectories are better described as linear or non-linear. We analysed occupational career patterns (OCPs) over a period of 36 years using longitudinal data from a representative sample of men and women of the German-speaking part of Switzerland. The participants were mostly born in 1963; the data collection spans from 1978 until 2015. For 584 persons, information about the occupational development from age 16 to 52 years was available. Each year’s activity was categorised using the International Standard Classification of Occupations. We conducted sequence analysis (optimal matching analysis) to find clusters and ANOVAs to compare group differences. The results showed six plausible and differentiated OCPs for both genders which support linear career models. For women, OCPs were generally stable. In contrast, men showed more change and upward mobility in OCPs. These patterns were influenced by indicators collected from participants when they were age 15, such as the family’s socio-economic status, the individual’s performance on intelligence measures and attitudes toward gender equality. Furthermore, we found several consequences of OCPs at age 52 on objective indicators of career success (status, income) and subjective indicators (work perception, life satisfaction and health status).Key messagesWe studied career development over a period of 36 years (from adolescence to midlife) in Switzerland.Six plausible occupational career patterns supporting a linear model were found for both genders.In women’s career patterns, considerable stability can be observed, while men show more upward mobility.Patterns of upward mobility are related to objective and subjective career success.","PeriodicalId":45988,"journal":{"name":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/175795921X16137663687028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is an open empirical question whether occupational trajectories are better described as linear or non-linear. We analysed occupational career patterns (OCPs) over a period of 36 years using longitudinal data from a representative sample of men and women of the German-speaking part of Switzerland. The participants were mostly born in 1963; the data collection spans from 1978 until 2015. For 584 persons, information about the occupational development from age 16 to 52 years was available. Each year’s activity was categorised using the International Standard Classification of Occupations. We conducted sequence analysis (optimal matching analysis) to find clusters and ANOVAs to compare group differences. The results showed six plausible and differentiated OCPs for both genders which support linear career models. For women, OCPs were generally stable. In contrast, men showed more change and upward mobility in OCPs. These patterns were influenced by indicators collected from participants when they were age 15, such as the family’s socio-economic status, the individual’s performance on intelligence measures and attitudes toward gender equality. Furthermore, we found several consequences of OCPs at age 52 on objective indicators of career success (status, income) and subjective indicators (work perception, life satisfaction and health status).Key messagesWe studied career development over a period of 36 years (from adolescence to midlife) in Switzerland.Six plausible occupational career patterns supporting a linear model were found for both genders.In women’s career patterns, considerable stability can be observed, while men show more upward mobility.Patterns of upward mobility are related to objective and subjective career success.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
36年来瑞士男女职业模式的稳定性和流动性
职业轨迹是用线性还是非线性来描述更好,这是一个开放性的实证问题。我们使用来自瑞士德语区的男性和女性代表性样本的纵向数据,分析了36年来的职业生涯模式(ocp)。参与者大多出生于1963年;数据收集时间从1978年到2015年。584人从16岁到52岁的职业发展信息是可获得的。每年的活动都按照国际职业标准分类进行分类。我们进行了序列分析(最优匹配分析)来寻找聚类和方差分析来比较组间差异。结果显示,在职业生涯线性模型中,男性和女性都有6个合理且有差异的职业生涯目标。对于女性来说,ocp总体上是稳定的。相比之下,男性在ocp中表现出更多的变化和向上流动。这些模式受到从参与者15岁时收集的指标的影响,例如家庭的社会经济地位、个人在智力测试中的表现以及对性别平等的态度。此外,我们还发现了52岁的ocp对职业成功的客观指标(地位、收入)和主观指标(工作感知、生活满意度和健康状况)的几个影响。我们在瑞士研究了36年的职业发展(从青春期到中年)。在两性中都发现了支持线性模型的六种似是而非的职业生涯模式。在妇女的职业模式中,可以观察到相当大的稳定性,而男子则表现出更多的向上流动。向上流动的模式与客观和主观的职业成功有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
John Bynner obituary: to a pioneer of social research using comparative longitudinal data (28 April 1938 to 22 August 2023). Creating our legacy. Mediation of risk factors for high blood pressure in four racial and ethnic populations. Socio-economic gradients in pupils' self-efficacy: evidence, evolution and main drivers during the primary school years in France. SHARE Corona Surveys: study profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1