The standardisation of the life course in 20th-century China

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Longitudinal and Life Course Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1332/175795921x16246259276004
Dianxi Wang, Yufeng Zhao
{"title":"The standardisation of the life course in 20th-century China","authors":"Dianxi Wang, Yufeng Zhao","doi":"10.1332/175795921x16246259276004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most Western countries, the patterning of the individual life course had reached a high level of uniformity by the 1960s. However, since the late 1970s, indications of an inverse tendency towards destandardisation of the life course have been observed, especially regarding life transitions and status sequences linked to family and occupation. Within China, little research has been conducted to examine the standardisation/destandardisation of the life course. This study uses life history data to take a preliminary step in addressing this question, using a sample of Chinese people born between 1920 and 1969 from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. The sample is divided into five cohorts of individuals born in 1920–29, 1930–39, 1940–49, 1950–59 and 1960–69. We found that the life course of individuals in these cohorts generally shows a trend of increasing standardisation from the earliest to the most recent cohort, with the exception of the youngest cohort. There are substantively important group differences seen in the standardisation of the life course; a higher level of standardisation is seen in male and rural cohorts in the education–employment trajectories, compared to female and urban cohorts. Further, in terms of family life course, the standardisation of urban cohorts is higher than that of rural cohorts. Different domains of life course show inconsistent paces in their processes of standardisation; this can be seen manifested in the case of individuals’ education–employment trajectories, which tend to be more standardised than family life course.Key messagesThe life course of Chinese people born between 1920 and 1969 generally shows a trend of increasing standardisation.There is a higher level of standardisation in male and rural cohorts in occupational trajectories, compared to female and urban cohorts.In family life course, the standardisation of urban cohorts is higher than that of rural cohorts.","PeriodicalId":45988,"journal":{"name":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/175795921x16246259276004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In most Western countries, the patterning of the individual life course had reached a high level of uniformity by the 1960s. However, since the late 1970s, indications of an inverse tendency towards destandardisation of the life course have been observed, especially regarding life transitions and status sequences linked to family and occupation. Within China, little research has been conducted to examine the standardisation/destandardisation of the life course. This study uses life history data to take a preliminary step in addressing this question, using a sample of Chinese people born between 1920 and 1969 from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. The sample is divided into five cohorts of individuals born in 1920–29, 1930–39, 1940–49, 1950–59 and 1960–69. We found that the life course of individuals in these cohorts generally shows a trend of increasing standardisation from the earliest to the most recent cohort, with the exception of the youngest cohort. There are substantively important group differences seen in the standardisation of the life course; a higher level of standardisation is seen in male and rural cohorts in the education–employment trajectories, compared to female and urban cohorts. Further, in terms of family life course, the standardisation of urban cohorts is higher than that of rural cohorts. Different domains of life course show inconsistent paces in their processes of standardisation; this can be seen manifested in the case of individuals’ education–employment trajectories, which tend to be more standardised than family life course.Key messagesThe life course of Chinese people born between 1920 and 1969 generally shows a trend of increasing standardisation.There is a higher level of standardisation in male and rural cohorts in occupational trajectories, compared to female and urban cohorts.In family life course, the standardisation of urban cohorts is higher than that of rural cohorts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
20世纪中国人生历程的规范化
在大多数西方国家,到20世纪60年代,个人生命历程的模式已达到高度统一。然而,自1970年代后期以来,已经观察到生命过程非标准化的反向趋势,特别是在与家庭和职业有关的生活转变和地位顺序方面。在中国,很少有研究对生命过程的标准化/非标准化进行研究。本研究使用生活史数据为解决这个问题迈出了初步的一步,使用了中国健康与退休纵向研究中1920年至1969年出生的中国人的样本。样本被分为五组,分别出生于1920 - 29,1930 - 39,1940 - 49,1950 - 59和1960-69年。我们发现,除了最年轻的队列外,这些队列中个体的生命历程总体上呈现出从最早到最近的队列越来越标准化的趋势。在生命历程的标准化方面存在着实质性的重要群体差异;与女性和城市人群相比,男性和农村人群在教育-就业轨迹上的标准化程度更高。此外,在家庭生命历程方面,城市队列的标准化程度高于农村队列。生命历程的不同领域在其标准化过程中表现出不一致的步伐;这可以从个人的教育-就业轨迹中看出,这往往比家庭生活过程更加标准化。出生于1920年至1969年之间的中国人的人生历程总体上呈现出越来越标准化的趋势。与女性和城市人群相比,男性和农村人群的职业轨迹标准化程度更高。在家庭生活过程中,城市队列的标准化程度高于农村队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
John Bynner obituary: to a pioneer of social research using comparative longitudinal data (28 April 1938 to 22 August 2023). Creating our legacy. Mediation of risk factors for high blood pressure in four racial and ethnic populations. Socio-economic gradients in pupils' self-efficacy: evidence, evolution and main drivers during the primary school years in France. SHARE Corona Surveys: study profile.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1