Alfred Martineau et la « genèse » du protectorat. Le cas indien (1745–1761)

IF 0.6 Q1 HISTORY French Colonial History Pub Date : 2013-05-25 DOI:10.1353/FCH.2013.0003
Massimiliano Vaghi
{"title":"Alfred Martineau et la « genèse » du protectorat. Le cas indien (1745–1761)","authors":"Massimiliano Vaghi","doi":"10.1353/FCH.2013.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alfred Martineau was a prominent colonial officer during the Third French Republic, and a scholar in history and international politics. His studies dealt with the problem of the origins of the “modern” form of colonialism in the second half of the nineteenth century, besides Ancien Régime French colonization. He saw the roots of “modern” European colonial rule in the activities of Dupleix and Bussy in eighteenth-century India. By underscoring the importance of both French officers, Martineau noticed important differences in the colonial activities of the two. According to Martineau, while Dupleix supported the idea of direct military conquest, Bussy favored a method of “indirect” colonization that was in some way the harbinger of the nineteenth-century model of protectorates. Yet in the light of the sources at our disposal today, the differences in the action of the two French colonizers are much less marked than in the frame depicted by Martineau. Both Dupleix and Bussy, in fact, used both coercion and more conciliatory policies toward indigenous India rulers. Dupleix and Bussy welded the usual economic and trade interests to the necessities of governance, in a similar way to French protectorates in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.","PeriodicalId":29880,"journal":{"name":"French Colonial History","volume":"14 1","pages":"71 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FCH.2013.0003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Colonial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FCH.2013.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Alfred Martineau was a prominent colonial officer during the Third French Republic, and a scholar in history and international politics. His studies dealt with the problem of the origins of the “modern” form of colonialism in the second half of the nineteenth century, besides Ancien Régime French colonization. He saw the roots of “modern” European colonial rule in the activities of Dupleix and Bussy in eighteenth-century India. By underscoring the importance of both French officers, Martineau noticed important differences in the colonial activities of the two. According to Martineau, while Dupleix supported the idea of direct military conquest, Bussy favored a method of “indirect” colonization that was in some way the harbinger of the nineteenth-century model of protectorates. Yet in the light of the sources at our disposal today, the differences in the action of the two French colonizers are much less marked than in the frame depicted by Martineau. Both Dupleix and Bussy, in fact, used both coercion and more conciliatory policies toward indigenous India rulers. Dupleix and Bussy welded the usual economic and trade interests to the necessities of governance, in a similar way to French protectorates in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿尔弗雷德·马蒂诺和保护国的“起源”。印度案例(1745 - 1761)
阿尔弗雷德·马蒂诺是法兰西第三共和国时期杰出的殖民官员,也是历史和国际政治方面的学者。他的研究涉及19世纪下半叶“现代”形式殖民主义的起源问题,除了古代法国殖民主义之外。他认为“现代”欧洲殖民统治的根源在于18世纪印度的杜普莱克斯和布西的活动。通过强调两位法国军官的重要性,马蒂诺注意到两人在殖民活动中的重要差异。根据马蒂诺的说法,杜普莱支持直接军事征服的想法,而布西则倾向于一种“间接”殖民的方法,这种方法在某种程度上是19世纪保护国模式的先驱。然而,根据我们今天掌握的资料,这两个法国殖民者在行动上的差异远没有马蒂诺所描绘的那样明显。事实上,杜普雷克斯和布西都对印度土著统治者采取了胁迫和和解的政策。Dupleix和Bussy将通常的经济和贸易利益与治理的必要性结合在一起,类似于19世纪和20世纪法国的保护国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
St. Louis Once Was "P(a)in-Cour(t)"—But Was It Ever "Short of Bread"? Come Drive French North Africa: Cartographic and Guidebook Discourse in Michelin's 1929 Maroc, Algérie, Tunisie "The Great Game of Hide and Seek Has Worked": Suzanne Césaire, Cultural Marronnage, and a Caribbean Mosaic of Gendered Race Consciousness around World War II "I May Vote Like All Women": Protest, Gender, and Suffrage in French Senegal, 1944–1945 World War II and the Rise of Feminism in Martinique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1