Performance Evaluation of SWAT-based Model for the Prediction of Potential and Actual Evapotranspiration

IF 1 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.14525/jjce.v16i1.01
Abdulkadir T. Sholagberu
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of SWAT-based Model for the Prediction of Potential and Actual Evapotranspiration","authors":"Abdulkadir T. Sholagberu","doi":"10.14525/jjce.v16i1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrological models have become an important tool for the efficient management of water resources. However, selection of appropriate models for evapotranspiration (ET) computations in river basins remains challenging to watershed managers, especially in data-scarce regions. The performance of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)-based model for the prediction of potential and actual evapotranspiration (PET and AET) of OgunOshun river basin, Nigeria was investigated. Spatial and meteorological data was applied in setting up Mapwindow SWAT model. The three existing methods: Penman-Monteith, Priestly-Taylor (radiation-based) and Hargreaves (temperature-based), available in SWAT-were applied for the evaluation of PET and AET using soil, topographic, land-use and meteorological data as input parameters. The model results show a good correlation between the simulated and observed dataset as shown by Nasch-Sucliffe efficiency and coefficient of determination values. For the 30 year-simulation period, the predicted average PET values for PenmanMonteith, Priestley-Taylor and Hargreaves methods were 1791.516, 1684.597 and 1724.563 mm with corresponding standard deviation values of 89.322, 53.824 and 77.867 mm, respectively. The analysis indicated that Penman-Monteith and Hargreaves methods yielded almost the same results, while Priestly-Taylor method slightly differs, which establishes that it is not very suitable for arid/semi-arid regions. The study could be beneficial to watershed managers in addressing climate-related problems and for sustainable water resource management. KEYWORDS: SWAT, Potential evapotranspiration, Actual evapotranspiration, Watershed.","PeriodicalId":51814,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14525/jjce.v16i1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Hydrological models have become an important tool for the efficient management of water resources. However, selection of appropriate models for evapotranspiration (ET) computations in river basins remains challenging to watershed managers, especially in data-scarce regions. The performance of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)-based model for the prediction of potential and actual evapotranspiration (PET and AET) of OgunOshun river basin, Nigeria was investigated. Spatial and meteorological data was applied in setting up Mapwindow SWAT model. The three existing methods: Penman-Monteith, Priestly-Taylor (radiation-based) and Hargreaves (temperature-based), available in SWAT-were applied for the evaluation of PET and AET using soil, topographic, land-use and meteorological data as input parameters. The model results show a good correlation between the simulated and observed dataset as shown by Nasch-Sucliffe efficiency and coefficient of determination values. For the 30 year-simulation period, the predicted average PET values for PenmanMonteith, Priestley-Taylor and Hargreaves methods were 1791.516, 1684.597 and 1724.563 mm with corresponding standard deviation values of 89.322, 53.824 and 77.867 mm, respectively. The analysis indicated that Penman-Monteith and Hargreaves methods yielded almost the same results, while Priestly-Taylor method slightly differs, which establishes that it is not very suitable for arid/semi-arid regions. The study could be beneficial to watershed managers in addressing climate-related problems and for sustainable water resource management. KEYWORDS: SWAT, Potential evapotranspiration, Actual evapotranspiration, Watershed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于swat的潜在蒸散发和实际蒸散发预测模型的性能评价
水文模型已成为水资源有效管理的重要工具。然而,为流域蒸散发(ET)计算选择合适的模型仍然是流域管理者面临的挑战,特别是在数据稀缺地区。研究了基于SWAT模型预测尼日利亚奥古诺顺河流域潜在蒸散量和实际蒸散量的效果。利用空间和气象数据建立了Mapwindow SWAT模型。利用swat现有的Penman-Monteith、priestley - taylor(基于辐射)和Hargreaves(基于温度)三种方法,以土壤、地形、土地利用和气象数据作为输入参数,对PET和AET进行评估。模型结果表明,模拟数据集与观测数据集具有良好的相关性,如nash - sucliffe效率和决定系数值。在30年的模拟周期内,PenmanMonteith、Priestley-Taylor和Hargreaves方法预测的PET平均值分别为1791.516、1684.597和1724.563 mm,标准差分别为89.322、53.824和77.867 mm。分析表明,Penman-Monteith方法与Hargreaves方法的结果基本一致,而Priestly-Taylor方法的结果略有不同,这表明Penman-Monteith方法不太适合干旱/半干旱地区。这项研究可能有利于流域管理者解决与气候有关的问题和可持续水资源管理。关键词:SWAT,潜在蒸散,实际蒸散,流域
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
27.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: I am very pleased and honored to be appointed as an Editor-in-Chief of the Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering which enjoys an excellent reputation, both locally and internationally. Since development is the essence of life, I hope to continue developing this distinguished Journal, building on the effort of all the Editors-in-Chief and Editorial Board Members as well as Advisory Boards of the Journal since its establishment about a decade ago. I will do my best to focus on publishing high quality diverse articles and move forward in the indexing issue of the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Mapping Floods during Cloudy Weather Using Radar Satellite Images Assessing the Accident-Cost Relationship in Building Construction Projects Using Structural Equation Modeling Detection of Sub-surface Delamination and Moisture Penetration in Unlined Rock Tunnels Using Passive Thermography and Tapping Rehabilitation of Fire-damaged Reinforced-concrete Slabs Using Ferro-cement Using Palm Oil Fuel Ash as a Source Material for Alumina Silicate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1