Regionalization of Low Flow Analysis in Data Scarce Region: The Case of the Lake Abaya-Chamo Sub-basin, Rift Valley Lakes Basin, Ethiopia

IF 1.2 Q4 WATER RESOURCES Journal of Water Management Modeling Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.14796/jwmm.c487
D. Abdi, S. Gebrekristos
{"title":"Regionalization of Low Flow Analysis in Data Scarce Region: The Case of the Lake Abaya-Chamo Sub-basin, Rift Valley Lakes Basin, Ethiopia","authors":"D. Abdi, S. Gebrekristos","doi":"10.14796/jwmm.c487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prediction of low flows in ungauged catchments is desirable for planning and management of water resources development and for sustaining the environment. The main objective of this study was to regionalize low flow indexes (the baseflow index BFI, Q80, Q90, and Q95) in the Lake Abaya–Chamo sub-basin by using multiple linear regression models. To develop the regional equation, nine baseflow separation methods were compared: two digital graphical methods and seven recursive digital filters were compared and applied in eight gauged catchments. The methods were evaluated through the coefficient of determination (R2) and the root mean square error (RMSE) as performance measures. The flow duration analyses were conducted to compute the flow exceedance quantiles Q80, Q90, and Q95. Regionalizing those indexes required the identification of homogeneous regions, which was accomplished through cluster analysis, based on physiographic and climatic data. Three significantly different homogeneous areas were identified using k-means clustering, and multiple linear regression models were developed for every low flow index in each homogeneous region. The R2 values in the model developed for BFI, Q80, Q90, and Q95 range from 0.75 to 0.98 throughout the region. For checking the performance of the model, verification of regional models was carried out by determining the relative error over four gauged catchments assuming they were ungauged. All regional models performed well by having relative errors <10% in the regions showing high performance. Therefore, the developed regional models could potentially solve the low flow estimation in the vast majority of ungauged catchments in the sub-basin. Consequently, current and future water resources development endeavors may use such estimation methods for planning, designing, and management purposes.","PeriodicalId":43297,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Management Modeling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Management Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14796/jwmm.c487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prediction of low flows in ungauged catchments is desirable for planning and management of water resources development and for sustaining the environment. The main objective of this study was to regionalize low flow indexes (the baseflow index BFI, Q80, Q90, and Q95) in the Lake Abaya–Chamo sub-basin by using multiple linear regression models. To develop the regional equation, nine baseflow separation methods were compared: two digital graphical methods and seven recursive digital filters were compared and applied in eight gauged catchments. The methods were evaluated through the coefficient of determination (R2) and the root mean square error (RMSE) as performance measures. The flow duration analyses were conducted to compute the flow exceedance quantiles Q80, Q90, and Q95. Regionalizing those indexes required the identification of homogeneous regions, which was accomplished through cluster analysis, based on physiographic and climatic data. Three significantly different homogeneous areas were identified using k-means clustering, and multiple linear regression models were developed for every low flow index in each homogeneous region. The R2 values in the model developed for BFI, Q80, Q90, and Q95 range from 0.75 to 0.98 throughout the region. For checking the performance of the model, verification of regional models was carried out by determining the relative error over four gauged catchments assuming they were ungauged. All regional models performed well by having relative errors <10% in the regions showing high performance. Therefore, the developed regional models could potentially solve the low flow estimation in the vast majority of ungauged catchments in the sub-basin. Consequently, current and future water resources development endeavors may use such estimation methods for planning, designing, and management purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据稀缺地区低流量分析的区域化——以埃塞俄比亚大裂谷湖盆Abaya-Chamo子流域为例
预测未计量集水区的低流量对于规划和管理水资源开发以及维持环境是必要的。本研究的主要目的是利用多元线性回归模型对Abaya-Chamo子流域低流量指数(基本流量指数BFI、Q80、Q90和Q95)进行区划。为了建立区域方程,对九种基流分离方法进行了比较:两种数字图形方法和七种递归数字滤波器在八个计量集水区进行了比较和应用。通过决定系数(R2)和均方根误差(RMSE)作为性能指标对方法进行评价。通过流时分析计算流量超标分位数Q80、Q90和Q95。这些指标的区域化需要在地理和气候数据的基础上通过聚类分析来确定同质区域。利用k-means聚类方法识别出三个显著不同的均匀区域,并对每个均匀区域的每个低流量指数建立多元线性回归模型。在整个地区,BFI、Q80、Q90和Q95模型的R2值在0.75 ~ 0.98之间。为了检查模型的性能,通过确定假定未测量的四个测量集水区的相对误差,对区域模型进行了验证。所有区域模型都表现良好,在表现优异的区域,相对误差<10%。因此,开发的区域模型可以潜在地解决子流域绝大多数未测量集水区的低流量估算问题。因此,当前和未来的水资源开发工作可能会在规划、设计和管理中使用这种估算方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Modeling the Rainfall–Runoff Relationship with TOPMODEL in the Wadi El Kebir Watershed Bioretention Model for Urban Runoff Treatment in a Tropical Climate: A Case Study at the Universiti Sains Malaysia Rainfall-flow Modeling Using a Global Conceptual Model: Case of the Beni Bahdel Watershed (Northwest of Algeria) Numerical Simulation of Flood Propagation in the Kelara River Flood Early Warning System A New Two-dimensional Dual-permeability Model of Preferential Water Flow in the Vadose Zone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1