Plant diversity patterns of a Hungarian steppe-wetland mosaic in relation to grazing regime and land use history

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES Tuexenia Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.14471/2015.35.006
C. Tölgyesi, Z. Bátori, L. Erdős, R. Gallé, L. Körmöczi
{"title":"Plant diversity patterns of a Hungarian steppe-wetland mosaic in relation to grazing regime and land use history","authors":"C. Tölgyesi, Z. Bátori, L. Erdős, R. Gallé, L. Körmöczi","doi":"10.14471/2015.35.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Steppes used to cover large areas of Hungary, but most of this vegetation has since been destroyed. In Central Hungary, some patches have survived on ridges in wet meadows. These habitat complexes face profound land use changes and their optimal management regime is uncertain. We identified seven annually mown steppe and wet meadow types according to their grazing regime and history and aimed to answer the following questions: (1) Does grazing have beneficial effects on mown steppes and wet meadows? (2) Should the presently homogeneous management of neighbouring steppes and wet meadows be maintained? (3) Is annual mowing sufficient in assisting the recovery of steppes and wet meadows on former croplands? We selected three localities for each of the seven vegetation types and sampled them with 50 quadrats (50 × 50 cm) in each locality, making a total of 1,050 quadrats. Vascular plant diversity relations were evaluated using the total number of species per habitat type (species richness) and the average number of species per quadrat (microsite diversity). The effect of grazing and history on microsite diversity was tested with linear mixed-effect models. We used Redundancy Analysis to disentangle the role of grazing intensity and management history on species composition. Plant species were then sorted into functional groups, and the proportions of these groups were used to evaluate community structure. Our results indicate that mowing alone cannot maintain as high a diversity as the combination of the two land use types, thus grazing should be introduced to non-grazed areas. Steppes, however, were found more sensitive to the intensity of grazing than wet meadows. Under heavy grazing, no increased microsite diversity was detected in the steppes and the proportion of disturbance indicators tended to increase. In contrast, the same grazing intensity resulted in only positive effects in wet meadows. Thus, uniform land use on adjacent steppes and wet meadows is not recommended but intensive grazing should be stopped on steppes. Secondary steppes were less diverse than primary ones and their community structure was also poorer, whereas wet meadows had a better regeneration potential. Thus, mowing alone is an incomplete tool to restore the plant diversity of secondary steppes; they should also be grazed and/or should be supported by other active interventions.","PeriodicalId":48870,"journal":{"name":"Tuexenia","volume":"1 1","pages":"399-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuexenia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14471/2015.35.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Steppes used to cover large areas of Hungary, but most of this vegetation has since been destroyed. In Central Hungary, some patches have survived on ridges in wet meadows. These habitat complexes face profound land use changes and their optimal management regime is uncertain. We identified seven annually mown steppe and wet meadow types according to their grazing regime and history and aimed to answer the following questions: (1) Does grazing have beneficial effects on mown steppes and wet meadows? (2) Should the presently homogeneous management of neighbouring steppes and wet meadows be maintained? (3) Is annual mowing sufficient in assisting the recovery of steppes and wet meadows on former croplands? We selected three localities for each of the seven vegetation types and sampled them with 50 quadrats (50 × 50 cm) in each locality, making a total of 1,050 quadrats. Vascular plant diversity relations were evaluated using the total number of species per habitat type (species richness) and the average number of species per quadrat (microsite diversity). The effect of grazing and history on microsite diversity was tested with linear mixed-effect models. We used Redundancy Analysis to disentangle the role of grazing intensity and management history on species composition. Plant species were then sorted into functional groups, and the proportions of these groups were used to evaluate community structure. Our results indicate that mowing alone cannot maintain as high a diversity as the combination of the two land use types, thus grazing should be introduced to non-grazed areas. Steppes, however, were found more sensitive to the intensity of grazing than wet meadows. Under heavy grazing, no increased microsite diversity was detected in the steppes and the proportion of disturbance indicators tended to increase. In contrast, the same grazing intensity resulted in only positive effects in wet meadows. Thus, uniform land use on adjacent steppes and wet meadows is not recommended but intensive grazing should be stopped on steppes. Secondary steppes were less diverse than primary ones and their community structure was also poorer, whereas wet meadows had a better regeneration potential. Thus, mowing alone is an incomplete tool to restore the plant diversity of secondary steppes; they should also be grazed and/or should be supported by other active interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匈牙利草原-湿地马赛克植物多样性格局与放牧制度和土地利用历史的关系
草原曾经覆盖匈牙利的大部分地区,但大部分植被已经被破坏。在匈牙利中部,湿草地的山脊上幸存了一些斑块。这些生境综合体面临着深刻的土地利用变化,其最佳管理制度是不确定的。根据不同的放牧制度和放牧历史,我们确定了7种年割草草原和湿草甸类型,旨在回答以下问题:(1)放牧是否对割草草原和湿草甸有益?(2)邻近的草原和湿草甸是否应该保持目前的同质管理?(3)每年割草是否足以帮助恢复原农田上的草原和湿草甸?7种植被类型各选3个地点,每个地点50个样方(50 × 50 cm),共1050个样方。利用每个生境类型的总物种数(物种丰富度)和每个样方的平均物种数(微点多样性)来评价维管植物多样性关系。采用线性混合效应模型考察了放牧和历史对微站点多样性的影响。利用冗余分析分析了放牧强度和管理历史对物种组成的影响。然后将植物分类成功能类群,并利用各功能类群的比例评价群落结构。研究结果表明,单纯放牧不能维持与两种土地利用方式相结合的多样性,因此应在非放牧地区引入放牧。然而,草原对放牧强度的敏感性高于湿润草甸。在重度放牧条件下,草原微站点多样性没有增加,干扰指标的比例有增加的趋势。在相同的放牧强度下,湿草甸只有正效应。因此,不建议在邻近的草原和湿草甸上统一使用土地,但应停止在草原上集约放牧。次生草原的多样性低于初生草原,群落结构也较差,而湿草甸具有较好的更新潜力。因此,仅靠割草是恢复次生草原植物多样性的不完备工具;它们还应该放牧和/或得到其他积极干预措施的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tuexenia
Tuexenia PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Tuexenia publiziert Original- und Übersichtsarbeiten sowie Berichte zu Themen der Geobotanik / Vegetationsökologie und zu Nachbarwissenschaften wie Populationsökologie, Biodiversitätsforschung, Biozönologie, Renaturierungsökologie und ihren Anwendungen, vor allem im Naturschutz. Der geografische Schwerpunkt liegt in Zentraleuropa und angrenzenden Regionen.Tuexenia erscheint jährlich in einem Band, der etwa zur Jahresmitte fertig gestellt wird. Autoren erhalten von jeder Arbeit eine PDF-Datei und gemeinsam 20 Sonderdrucke kostenlos. Die Qualität der wissenschaftlichen Manuskripte wird durch die Redaktion und einen Wissenschaftlichen Beirat (Peer Review) gesichert (s. auch die Manuskript-Richtlinien vor dieser Seite). Es werden keine Druckkosten erhoben. Tuexenia legt Wert auf allgemeine Online-Verfügbarkeit der Beiträge.
期刊最新文献
Vegetation change in meso-xeric grasslands of the Swiss Jura Mts. over 40 years Vegetation changes in urban grasslands over 25 years in the city of Zurich, Switzerland Determination of habitat requirements of the glacial relict Nuphar pumila as basis for successful (re-)introductions Optimal site conditions for dry grasslands of high conservation value in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland Wenn Gämsen Schafe ersetzen : Fallstudie zu den Auswirkungen auf die Diversität von alpinen Rasen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1