{"title":"CHORUS: Collective subjectivity in quotational writing practices","authors":"Robert Fitterman","doi":"10.1386/jwcp.13.1.77_3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"‘CHORUS: Collective subjectivity in quotational writing practices’ is a ‘poet’s essay’ that examines new ways to consider subjectivity and personal affect through the use of found language. Through several examples in contemporary poetry, the essay asserts that a collective voice or ‘chorus’ or an avatar-like found voice as a protagonist can articulate the emotional zeitgeist of a cultural moment. The essay argues that this quotational response to personal and public trauma is no less legitimate than the singular articulation of a more conventional lyric poem. Further, the essay emphasizes that the boundaries between original material and found material have become increasingly blurred. As a poet’s essay, and one that addresses quotational writing, ‘CHORUS’ intentionally omits the scholarly use of proper citation.","PeriodicalId":38498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","volume":"13 1","pages":"77-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp.13.1.77_3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
‘CHORUS: Collective subjectivity in quotational writing practices’ is a ‘poet’s essay’ that examines new ways to consider subjectivity and personal affect through the use of found language. Through several examples in contemporary poetry, the essay asserts that a collective voice or ‘chorus’ or an avatar-like found voice as a protagonist can articulate the emotional zeitgeist of a cultural moment. The essay argues that this quotational response to personal and public trauma is no less legitimate than the singular articulation of a more conventional lyric poem. Further, the essay emphasizes that the boundaries between original material and found material have become increasingly blurred. As a poet’s essay, and one that addresses quotational writing, ‘CHORUS’ intentionally omits the scholarly use of proper citation.