Randomness and chance as writing methodology: Is there a case for Dada in the academic essay?

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Writing in Creative Practice Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1386/JWCP_00015_1
M. Eden
{"title":"Randomness and chance as writing methodology: Is there a case for Dada in the academic essay?","authors":"M. Eden","doi":"10.1386/JWCP_00015_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to first speculate and then demonstrate how Dada methods can be used by creative practitioners or writers in general within an academic essay. In particular, the inclusion of randomness and chance is examined in the writing process with a view to foreground materiality in writing development and execution. Methods to make use of chance and to randomize text are outlined and the distinction between randomness and chance is clearly drawn. Antecedents to Dada and to the cut-up techniques that form the focus of the method outlined here are examined and offer context for the development of an embodied and empowered approach to challenges encountered around academic writing. Furthermore, contemporary scholarship that reflects on writing in higher education is drawn on to highlight the article’s primary purpose; that being to offer a background, explanation and useful methodology for the inclusion of randomness and chance which addresses the institutional demands encountered by students. The article draws on work created and discussed at a workshop that took place at Central St Martins in 2019, called ‘Breaking Into and Out of Academic Writing’. This workshop included various students from University of Arts London experimenting with the cut-up techniques and discussing their potential use in writing.","PeriodicalId":38498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JWCP_00015_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article attempts to first speculate and then demonstrate how Dada methods can be used by creative practitioners or writers in general within an academic essay. In particular, the inclusion of randomness and chance is examined in the writing process with a view to foreground materiality in writing development and execution. Methods to make use of chance and to randomize text are outlined and the distinction between randomness and chance is clearly drawn. Antecedents to Dada and to the cut-up techniques that form the focus of the method outlined here are examined and offer context for the development of an embodied and empowered approach to challenges encountered around academic writing. Furthermore, contemporary scholarship that reflects on writing in higher education is drawn on to highlight the article’s primary purpose; that being to offer a background, explanation and useful methodology for the inclusion of randomness and chance which addresses the institutional demands encountered by students. The article draws on work created and discussed at a workshop that took place at Central St Martins in 2019, called ‘Breaking Into and Out of Academic Writing’. This workshop included various students from University of Arts London experimenting with the cut-up techniques and discussing their potential use in writing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随意性和偶然性作为写作方法:达达主义在学术论文中是否存在?
这篇文章试图首先推测,然后展示如何达达方法可以被创造性的从业者或作家在学术论文中使用。特别是,在写作过程中检查随机性和偶然性,以期在写作发展和执行中突出重要性。概述了利用偶然性和随机化文本的方法,并明确了随机性和偶然性之间的区别。本文考察了达达主义和切分技术的前身,这些技术构成了本文概述的方法的重点,并为学术写作中遇到的挑战提供了具体化和授权方法的发展背景。此外,当代学术研究反映了高等教育中的写作,以突出文章的主要目的;这是为了提供一个背景,解释和有用的方法来包含随机性和偶然性,以解决学生遇到的制度要求。这篇文章借鉴了2019年在中央圣马丁学院举行的一个名为“突破学术写作”的研讨会上创作和讨论的作品。来自伦敦艺术大学的多名学生参加了这次研讨会,他们尝试了剪纸技巧,并讨论了剪纸在写作中的潜在用途。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Writing in Creative Practice
Journal of Writing in Creative Practice Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Disfigment Bankrupsea Working Words: Words as tools to visualize embodied labour Towards a ‘spatial writing’: O Complex Mass Dialogue with St. K(aterina): An attempt at a prayer – a (not the) divine comedy Eight poor copies (electric speech)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1