{"title":"The relationship of texts to dead fish","authors":"J. Thackara","doi":"10.1386/JWCP_00010_7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"John Thackara’s theory of change is borrowed from Ilya Prigogene: ‘when a system is far from equilibrium, small islands of coherence have the capacity to shift the entire system’. As a writer, he explains, his work therefore involves a search for small islands of coherence – that he can later describe – in which social and ecological relationships thrive together. His aim as a curator is similar: he strives to enable embodied encounters with situations (or ‘islands’) in which we feel ourselves to be part of nature, rather than separate from it. This work is therefore not symbolic, like ‘systems thinking’. It is more field work than head work. ‘I want people to experience relational ecologies, not just think about them’, Thackara states. He cites the artist Eva Bakkeslett as describing this process – the cultivation of ecological and social connectivity – as social fermentation.","PeriodicalId":38498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"5-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/JWCP_00010_7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
John Thackara’s theory of change is borrowed from Ilya Prigogene: ‘when a system is far from equilibrium, small islands of coherence have the capacity to shift the entire system’. As a writer, he explains, his work therefore involves a search for small islands of coherence – that he can later describe – in which social and ecological relationships thrive together. His aim as a curator is similar: he strives to enable embodied encounters with situations (or ‘islands’) in which we feel ourselves to be part of nature, rather than separate from it. This work is therefore not symbolic, like ‘systems thinking’. It is more field work than head work. ‘I want people to experience relational ecologies, not just think about them’, Thackara states. He cites the artist Eva Bakkeslett as describing this process – the cultivation of ecological and social connectivity – as social fermentation.
John Thackara的变化理论是从Ilya Prigogene那里借来的:“当一个系统远离平衡时,连贯的小岛屿有能力改变整个系统。”他解释说,作为一名作家,他的工作因此涉及寻找连贯的小岛——他可以稍后描述——在这些小岛上,社会和生态关系共同繁荣。作为一名策展人,他的目标是类似的:他努力让我们感受到自己是自然的一部分,而不是与自然分离的情景(或“岛屿”)。因此,这项工作不像“系统思考”那样具有象征意义。与其说是脑力劳动,不如说是野外劳动。“我希望人们体验关系生态学,而不仅仅是思考它们,”Thackara说。他引用了艺术家Eva Bakkeslett的话说,这个过程——生态和社会联系的培养——是社会发酵。