Being in the room together

IF 4.1 3区综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-28 DOI:10.1111/nyas.15077

Lorraine Daston

引用次数: 0

Abstract

As historians have shown and political theorists have acknowledged: no viable collective is ever just the result of cool cost-benefit calculations. Rather, it is a shared vision of what it would mean to be part of a collective that surmounts hesitation and commands allegiance. What that collective vision should be for science already has a 350-odd-year history, and the work of the imagination is still ongoing.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

一起在房间里。

正如历史学家和政治理论家所承认的那样：没有一个可行的集体只是冷静的成本效益计算的结果。相反，这是一个共同的愿景，即成为一个克服犹豫并获得忠诚的集体的一部分意味着什么。科学的集体愿景已经有350多年的历史了，想象力的工作仍在进行中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊

CiteScore

11.00

自引率

1.90%

发文量

193

审稿时长

2-4 weeks

期刊介绍： Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.

期刊最新文献

Inpatient diabetes management. Androgen abuse: Risks and adverse effects in men. Testosterone in prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes in men: Focus on recent randomized controlled trials. Inadequate mentoring in undergraduate research experiences: Exploring protective factors. Factors affecting shared decision-making concerning menopausal hormone therapy.