Securitizing Environmental Risk and the Keystone XL Pipeline

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS Economists Voice Pub Date : 2012-03-23 DOI:10.1515/1553-3832.1890

Kerry Smith

引用次数: 5

Abstract

When faced with irreversible decisions with significant uncertainty about the environmental costs of accidents, such as the Keystone XL Pipeline or hydro-fracking for natural gas, policymakers should use an environmental bond to securitize self insurance.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

环境风险证券化和Keystone XL管道

当面临不可逆转的决策，且事故造成的环境成本存在重大不确定性时，比如Keystone XL管道或水力压裂法开采天然气，政策制定者应该使用环境债券将自我保险证券化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Economists Voice ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

25.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： This journal is a non-partisan forum for economists to present innovative policy ideas or engaging commentary on the issues of the day. Readers include professional economists, lawyers, policy analysts, policymakers, and students of economics. Articles are short, 600-2000 words, and are intended to contain deeper analysis than is found on the Op-Ed page of the Wall Street Journal or New York Times, but to be of comparable general interest. We welcome submitted Columns from any professional economist. Letters to the editor are encouraged and may comment on any Column or Letter. Letters must be less than 300 words.

期刊最新文献

Natural Interest Rate and Money Interest Rates An Evolutionary Path Towards a European Monetary Fund The Fairy Tale of Low Inflation in the Euro Area Food Insecurity and Health Outcomes The Economists’ Voice: Special Issue on Nutrition and Poverty Introduction