Mothers and Vaccinations: From Personal Experiences to Shared Representations. A Challenge for Healthcare Authorities

P. Selleri, F. Carugati
{"title":"Mothers and Vaccinations: From Personal Experiences to Shared Representations. A Challenge for Healthcare Authorities","authors":"P. Selleri, F. Carugati","doi":"10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2020-3-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The paper aims at contributing to articulate the relationships between mothers’ vaccination history of their children’s approach to vaccination schedules and mothers’ myths, fears about vaccines, confidence in health authorities, and other sensitive issues found in academic literature (hesitancy, conspiracy, toxic chemicals, autism). While these issues are studied in terms of parents’ individual characteristics (ideas, attitudes, beliefs), the paper aims at showing the socio-cognitive organization of them, in terms of representational field, according to social representations theoretical approach. A convenient sample of mothers with preschool children, hosted in nurseries and kindergartens of an Italian region, was asked to fill a questionnaire with items concerning the abovementioned issues. Descriptive statistics and MCA analysis allowed to show the socio-cognitive organization of mothers’ representations about vaccination and their relationships with children’s vaccination histories. The results show a well-organized representation of the vaccination issues, where clusters of positive vs negative positions are concerning the mothers’ uncertainty (hesitancy) about the vaccination future of their children and the sensitivity to social media as sources of information. Moreover, mothers from low-level education tend to agree on myths, conspiracy, claims for free choice, and social media as primary sources of information, while university mothers tend to disagree. Uncertainty about completing the mandatory vaccination schedule plays the role on hesitancy. Mothers agree on the contents but disagree on the connotative quality of them: university mothers with younger vaccinated children are less afraid of vaccination procedures and less suspicious towards healthcare authorities. Confidence in these authorities, vs conspiracy of pharmaceutical industries, plays a significant role in shaping the mothers’ socio-cognitive representational field of vaccinations . Conclusion : The interconnection among representations, mothers’ vaccination history, universalistic values, and doubts about science showed that a socio-psychological approach is a useful tool for identifying the social conditions of the emergence of positive vs negative attitudes.","PeriodicalId":37576,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Sociology of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14658/PUPJ-IJSE-2020-3-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The paper aims at contributing to articulate the relationships between mothers’ vaccination history of their children’s approach to vaccination schedules and mothers’ myths, fears about vaccines, confidence in health authorities, and other sensitive issues found in academic literature (hesitancy, conspiracy, toxic chemicals, autism). While these issues are studied in terms of parents’ individual characteristics (ideas, attitudes, beliefs), the paper aims at showing the socio-cognitive organization of them, in terms of representational field, according to social representations theoretical approach. A convenient sample of mothers with preschool children, hosted in nurseries and kindergartens of an Italian region, was asked to fill a questionnaire with items concerning the abovementioned issues. Descriptive statistics and MCA analysis allowed to show the socio-cognitive organization of mothers’ representations about vaccination and their relationships with children’s vaccination histories. The results show a well-organized representation of the vaccination issues, where clusters of positive vs negative positions are concerning the mothers’ uncertainty (hesitancy) about the vaccination future of their children and the sensitivity to social media as sources of information. Moreover, mothers from low-level education tend to agree on myths, conspiracy, claims for free choice, and social media as primary sources of information, while university mothers tend to disagree. Uncertainty about completing the mandatory vaccination schedule plays the role on hesitancy. Mothers agree on the contents but disagree on the connotative quality of them: university mothers with younger vaccinated children are less afraid of vaccination procedures and less suspicious towards healthcare authorities. Confidence in these authorities, vs conspiracy of pharmaceutical industries, plays a significant role in shaping the mothers’ socio-cognitive representational field of vaccinations . Conclusion : The interconnection among representations, mothers’ vaccination history, universalistic values, and doubts about science showed that a socio-psychological approach is a useful tool for identifying the social conditions of the emergence of positive vs negative attitudes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母亲和疫苗接种:从个人经历到共同表征。医疗当局面临的挑战
本文旨在阐明母亲的疫苗接种史及其子女对疫苗接种时间表的态度与母亲的神话、对疫苗的恐惧、对卫生当局的信心以及学术文献中发现的其他敏感问题(犹豫、阴谋、有毒化学品、自闭症)之间的关系。虽然这些问题是根据父母的个人特征(想法、态度、信仰)来研究的,但本文旨在根据社会表征理论方法,从表征领域来展示这些问题的社会认知组织。在意大利一个地区的托儿所和幼儿园中,方便地选取了有学龄前儿童的母亲作为样本,请她们填写一份关于上述问题的问卷。描述性统计和MCA分析可以显示母亲对疫苗接种的陈述及其与儿童疫苗接种史的关系的社会认知组织。结果显示疫苗接种问题的组织良好,其中积极与消极立场的集群涉及母亲对其孩子接种疫苗的未来的不确定性(犹豫)以及对社交媒体作为信息来源的敏感性。此外,受教育程度较低的母亲倾向于认同神话、阴谋、自由选择的主张,以及社交媒体是主要的信息来源,而受过高等教育的母亲则倾向于不同意。完成强制性疫苗接种计划的不确定性对犹豫不决起作用。母亲们同意这些内容,但不同意它们的内涵质量:年龄较小的孩子接种疫苗的大学母亲不太害怕接种程序,也不太怀疑卫生保健当局。对这些当局的信任,与制药工业的阴谋,在塑造母亲接种疫苗的社会认知代表性领域方面发挥着重要作用。结论:陈述、母亲的疫苗接种史、普遍主义价值观和对科学的怀疑之间的相互联系表明,社会心理学方法是确定积极与消极态度出现的社会条件的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Italian Journal of Sociology of Education
Italian Journal of Sociology of Education Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Italian Journal of Sociology of Education is a peer-reviewed academic journal published three times a year (February, June, October) and sponsored by the Educational Section of the Italian Sociological Association (AIS-EDU).The journal aims at presenting up-to-date, state of the art theoretical and empirical studies concerning socialization, education, and educational institutions, enlarging and deepening the mutual knowledge and collaboration between Italian and foreign scholars within a broad global perspective. Main topics are the meanings of education; socialization and its institutional loci; school and the university; human and social capital; lifelong education; educational actors and policy; immigration and education.
期刊最新文献
Young people between uncertainty and agency. An analysis of the strategies of transition to adulthood in Italy Extending the Current Theorization on Cyberbullying: Importance of Including Socio-Psychological Perspectives Optimising Well-Being and Learning Through Participatory Processes and Practices: an International Comparative Analysis of Ten Groundwork Case-Studies in Schools Teachers’ Participation in School Decision-Making Processes and Practices: the Case of an Indian Government Secondary School Distributed Leadership to Enhance Participation in School Processes and Practices to Improve Learning: A Northern Irish Faith Secondary School Case-Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1