{"title":"Japan’s News Media, The Information Disclosure Law, and The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster","authors":"Lawrence Repeta","doi":"10.1515/ils-2015-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Official investigations that followed the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster revealed that it could have been prevented by reasonable safety measures. Investigators concluded that close relationships between government officials and industry executives led to very weak regulatory oversight and the failure to address the risk of violent earthquakes and tsunami such as those that struck the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station on March 11, 2011. News reporters conducted their own investigations in the months following the disaster. Japan’s information disclosure law provided an invaluable tool that enabled them to obtain government records related to regulation of Japan’s nuclear power plants. This article describes some of the stories they produced. Appearing on the front pages of newspapers with daily circulations in the millions, this work provided an authoritative inside view of the failed regulatory process to the Japanese people. The work of the investigative bodies and the news media drove the demand for change that led to disbanding of the regulatory agencies that failed and their replacement by an entirely new regulatory body. This article highlights the importance of “right to know” laws such as Japan’s information disclosure law in creating the opportunity for news reporters and others to demand the release of otherwise confidential government records that can enlighten everyone on matters of great public interest.","PeriodicalId":34921,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","volume":"16 1","pages":"69 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/ils-2015-0003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Legal Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ils-2015-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Official investigations that followed the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster revealed that it could have been prevented by reasonable safety measures. Investigators concluded that close relationships between government officials and industry executives led to very weak regulatory oversight and the failure to address the risk of violent earthquakes and tsunami such as those that struck the Fukushima Nuclear Power Station on March 11, 2011. News reporters conducted their own investigations in the months following the disaster. Japan’s information disclosure law provided an invaluable tool that enabled them to obtain government records related to regulation of Japan’s nuclear power plants. This article describes some of the stories they produced. Appearing on the front pages of newspapers with daily circulations in the millions, this work provided an authoritative inside view of the failed regulatory process to the Japanese people. The work of the investigative bodies and the news media drove the demand for change that led to disbanding of the regulatory agencies that failed and their replacement by an entirely new regulatory body. This article highlights the importance of “right to know” laws such as Japan’s information disclosure law in creating the opportunity for news reporters and others to demand the release of otherwise confidential government records that can enlighten everyone on matters of great public interest.
福岛核灾难后的官方调查显示,通过合理的安全措施,事故本可以避免。调查人员得出的结论是,政府官员和行业高管之间的密切关系导致监管监督非常薄弱,未能解决像2011年3月11日袭击福岛核电站(Fukushima Nuclear Power Station)那样的强烈地震和海啸的风险。新闻记者在灾难发生后的几个月里进行了自己的调查。日本的信息披露法提供了一个宝贵的工具,使他们能够获得与日本核电站监管有关的政府记录。本文描述了他们制作的一些故事。这项研究出现在每日发行量达数百万份的报纸的头版,为日本人民提供了一个权威的关于失败的监管过程的内部观点。调查机构和新闻媒体的工作推动了变革的需求,导致了失败的监管机构的解散,并由一个全新的监管机构取而代之。本文强调了“知情权”法律的重要性,例如日本的信息披露法,为新闻记者和其他人创造了要求公布政府机密记录的机会,这些记录可以启发每个人了解重大公共利益问题。
期刊介绍:
Issues in Legal Scholarship presents cutting-edge legal and policy research using the format of online peer-reviewed symposia. The journal’s emphasis on interdisciplinary work and legal theory extends to recent symposium topics such as Single-Sex Marriage, The Reformation of American Administrative Law, and Catastrophic Risks. The symposia systematically address emerging issues of great significance, offering ongoing scholarship of interest to a wide range of policy and legal researchers. Online publication makes it possible for other researchers to find the best and latest quickly, as well as to join in further discussion. Each symposium aims to be a living forum with ongoing publications and commentaries.