Serum folic acid, PCT, CRP and ESR detection as biomarker in differentiation ulcerative colitis activity

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Pteridines Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1515/pteridines-2018-0016
D. Xia, Jikun An
{"title":"Serum folic acid, PCT, CRP and ESR detection as biomarker in differentiation ulcerative colitis activity","authors":"D. Xia, Jikun An","doi":"10.1515/pteridines-2018-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: To investigate the serum concentration of folic acid, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as biomarkers in the differentiation of the severity of ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: Fifty one patients who had been diagnosed with UC were recruited from January 2014 to August 2017. Twenty-two of these patients had severe diseases while the remaining twenty-nine patients had mild/moderate disease, according to the Truelove-Witts classification criteria. In the same study, 26 healthy subjects which served as the healthy controls were included alongside the UC patient group. The serum folic acid, PCT, CRP and ESR were examined and compared among the healthy control, mild/moderate and severe UC groups. Results: The serum PCT, CRP and ESR in the control group were significantly lower than those of mild/moderate and severe UC groups with statistical significance (p<0.001). However, the serum folic acid in the control group was significant higher than that of mild/ moderate and severe UC groups (p<0.001). The serum folic acid (p=0.015), PCT (p<0.001) and ESR (p<0.001) were significantly different between the severe and mild/moderate groups. However, the serum CRP was not statistically significant between the mild/moderate and severe UC groups (p=0.06). Using serum folic acid, PCT, CRP and ESR as biomarkers in the differentiation of mild/moderate and severe UC, the serum PCT had good diagnostic accuracy for detecting severe UC with the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 85.71% (63.66~96.95%), 82.76% (64.23~94.15%), respectively under the cut off value of 0.045. The correlation between serum CRP, ESR and PCT were examined by Pearson correlation test and line regression analysis. However, there was no correlation between each of them with the exception of folic acid and ESR (r=-0.334, p=0.017). Conclusion: Serum folic acid, PCT, CRP and ESR are significantly elevated in patients with active UC thereby presenting novel and potentially promising biomarkers for the diagnosis and differentiation of mild/moderate and sever UC.","PeriodicalId":20792,"journal":{"name":"Pteridines","volume":"29 1","pages":"179 - 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/pteridines-2018-0016","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pteridines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pteridines-2018-0016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To investigate the serum concentration of folic acid, procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as biomarkers in the differentiation of the severity of ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods: Fifty one patients who had been diagnosed with UC were recruited from January 2014 to August 2017. Twenty-two of these patients had severe diseases while the remaining twenty-nine patients had mild/moderate disease, according to the Truelove-Witts classification criteria. In the same study, 26 healthy subjects which served as the healthy controls were included alongside the UC patient group. The serum folic acid, PCT, CRP and ESR were examined and compared among the healthy control, mild/moderate and severe UC groups. Results: The serum PCT, CRP and ESR in the control group were significantly lower than those of mild/moderate and severe UC groups with statistical significance (p<0.001). However, the serum folic acid in the control group was significant higher than that of mild/ moderate and severe UC groups (p<0.001). The serum folic acid (p=0.015), PCT (p<0.001) and ESR (p<0.001) were significantly different between the severe and mild/moderate groups. However, the serum CRP was not statistically significant between the mild/moderate and severe UC groups (p=0.06). Using serum folic acid, PCT, CRP and ESR as biomarkers in the differentiation of mild/moderate and severe UC, the serum PCT had good diagnostic accuracy for detecting severe UC with the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of 85.71% (63.66~96.95%), 82.76% (64.23~94.15%), respectively under the cut off value of 0.045. The correlation between serum CRP, ESR and PCT were examined by Pearson correlation test and line regression analysis. However, there was no correlation between each of them with the exception of folic acid and ESR (r=-0.334, p=0.017). Conclusion: Serum folic acid, PCT, CRP and ESR are significantly elevated in patients with active UC thereby presenting novel and potentially promising biomarkers for the diagnosis and differentiation of mild/moderate and sever UC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血清叶酸、PCT、CRP和ESR检测作为鉴别溃疡性结肠炎活动性的生物标志物
摘要目的:探讨血清叶酸、降钙素原(PCT)、c反应蛋白(CRP)和红细胞沉降率(ESR)作为溃疡性结肠炎(UC)严重程度鉴别的生物标志物。方法:从2014年1月至2017年8月招募51例被诊断为UC的患者。根据Truelove-Witts分类标准,这些患者中有22人患有严重疾病,而其余29人患有轻度/中度疾病。在同一项研究中,26名健康受试者与UC患者组一起作为健康对照。比较健康对照组、轻/中度和重度UC组患者血清叶酸、PCT、CRP和ESR水平。结果:对照组患者血清PCT、CRP、ESR均显著低于轻/中、重度UC组,差异均有统计学意义(p<0.001)。对照组血清叶酸水平显著高于轻/中度和重度UC组(p<0.001)。血清叶酸(p=0.015)、PCT (p<0.001)和ESR (p<0.001)在重度组和轻度/中度组之间差异有统计学意义。然而,血清CRP在轻度/中度和重度UC组之间无统计学意义(p=0.06)。将血清叶酸、PCT、CRP和ESR作为鉴别轻/中、重度UC的生物标志物,在截断值为0.045下,血清PCT对重度UC的诊断准确率较高,诊断敏感性和特异性分别为85.71%(63.66~96.95%)和82.76%(64.23~94.15%)。采用Pearson相关检验和线性回归分析血清CRP、ESR和PCT的相关性。然而,除了叶酸与ESR外,其余三者之间均无相关性(r=-0.334, p=0.017)。结论:活动性UC患者血清叶酸、PCT、CRP和ESR显著升高,为轻/中度和重度UC的诊断和鉴别提供了新的、有潜力的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pteridines
Pteridines 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pteridines is an open acess international quarterly journal dealing with all aspects of pteridine research. Pteridines are heterocyclic fused ring compounds involved in a wide range of biological functions from the color on butterfly wings to cofactors in enzyme catalysis to essential vitamins. Of the pteridines, 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin is the necessary cofactor of several aromatic amino acid monoxygenases, the nitric oxide synthases and glyceryl ether monoxygenase (GEMO). Neopterin plays an essential role in the immune system and is an important biomarker in laboratory medicine for diseases such as HIV, cardiovascular disease, malignant tumors, among others. Topics: -Neopterin, dihydroneopterin, monapterin- Biopterin, tetrahydrobiopterin- Folates, antifolates, riboflavin- Phenylalanine, tyrosine, phenylketonuria, serotonin, adrenalin, noradrenalin, L-DOPA, dopamine, related biogenic amines- Phenylalanine hydroxylase, tyrosine hydroxylase, tryptophan hydroxylase, nitric oxide synthases (iNOS), alkylglycerol monooxygenase (AGMO), dihydropterin reductase, sepiapterin reductase- Homocysteine, mediators of inflammation, redox systems, iron.
期刊最新文献
The advent of phyllobilins as bioactive phytochemicals – natural compounds derived from chlorophyll in medicinal plants and food with immunomodulatory activities Effect of NB-UVB therapy on IL-6 and neopterin levels in patients with psoriasis Serum homocysteine level was elevated in ulcerative colitis and can be applied as diagnostic biomarker Association between plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) and strokes: A meta-analysis Immunopterin: A prospective therapy and preventative to fight COVID-19?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1