A területgyarapítást célzó román és szerb propaganda Csanád vármegyében

Attila Marosvári
{"title":"A területgyarapítást célzó román és szerb propaganda Csanád vármegyében","authors":"Attila Marosvári","doi":"10.14232/belv.2022.3.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Csanád county was under Romanian military occupation from the end of April 1919 to the end of March 1920. The only exception to this was Makó, which was under French supervision for about two months, so the town was not taken over by the Romanians until mid-June 1919. The occupation of the county was in keeping with Romanian territorial aspirations, as the memorandum containing their demands for the Paris Peace Conference called for the borders which had been set out in the secret Treaty of Bucharest in August 1916. This would have included the whole of Csanád County. However, the great powers at the peace conference rejected the Romanian demands to annex these thoroughly Hungarian territories, and on June 13, 1919, they drew a narrower demarcation line, essentially corresponding to today’s border, which has not been subsequently changed. Romanian diplomacy, of course, used every means to get the boundary promised in the Treaty of Bucharest, which was much more favorable to them. One way to do this was to take advantage of the dissatisfaction and secessionist aspirations of the nationalities living in the disputed territory. This study takes into account the manifestations of Romanian territorial propaganda in Csanád – and more tangentially in neighboring Békés county – which targeted not only the relatively small number of ethnic Romanians, but also the Slovaks, who formed a slightly larger community. Although the focus of this study is on Romanian propaganda, for the sake of completeness, reference is also made to Serbian propaganda, as the Serbs also had territorial aspirations affecting Csanád county. One of the main findings of the study is that while Romanian propaganda focused primarily on the acquisition of territories, Serbian propaganda focused on winning over the people, which ultimately took the form of strengthening the intentions for the right of option which was also enshrined in the Treaty of Trianon.","PeriodicalId":30998,"journal":{"name":"Belvedere Meridionale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belvedere Meridionale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/belv.2022.3.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Csanád county was under Romanian military occupation from the end of April 1919 to the end of March 1920. The only exception to this was Makó, which was under French supervision for about two months, so the town was not taken over by the Romanians until mid-June 1919. The occupation of the county was in keeping with Romanian territorial aspirations, as the memorandum containing their demands for the Paris Peace Conference called for the borders which had been set out in the secret Treaty of Bucharest in August 1916. This would have included the whole of Csanád County. However, the great powers at the peace conference rejected the Romanian demands to annex these thoroughly Hungarian territories, and on June 13, 1919, they drew a narrower demarcation line, essentially corresponding to today’s border, which has not been subsequently changed. Romanian diplomacy, of course, used every means to get the boundary promised in the Treaty of Bucharest, which was much more favorable to them. One way to do this was to take advantage of the dissatisfaction and secessionist aspirations of the nationalities living in the disputed territory. This study takes into account the manifestations of Romanian territorial propaganda in Csanád – and more tangentially in neighboring Békés county – which targeted not only the relatively small number of ethnic Romanians, but also the Slovaks, who formed a slightly larger community. Although the focus of this study is on Romanian propaganda, for the sake of completeness, reference is also made to Serbian propaganda, as the Serbs also had territorial aspirations affecting Csanád county. One of the main findings of the study is that while Romanian propaganda focused primarily on the acquisition of territories, Serbian propaganda focused on winning over the people, which ultimately took the form of strengthening the intentions for the right of option which was also enshrined in the Treaty of Trianon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罗马尼亚和塞尔维亚旨在扩大Csanád县领土的宣传
Csanád县从1919年4月底到1920年3月底被罗马尼亚军队占领。唯一的例外是Makó,它被法国人监管了大约两个月,所以直到1919年6月中旬,该镇才被罗马尼亚人接管。对该县的占领符合罗马尼亚人对领土的渴望,因为他们在巴黎和会的备忘录中要求按照1916年8月布加勒斯特秘密条约规定的边界进行占领。这将包括整个Csanád县。然而,列强在和平会议上拒绝了罗马尼亚提出的完全吞并这些匈牙利领土的要求,并于1919年6月13日划定了一条更窄的分界线,基本上与今天的边界一致,这条线后来没有改变。罗马尼亚外交,当然,用尽一切手段得到布加勒斯特条约中承诺的边界,这对他们更有利。这样做的一个方法是利用生活在有争议领土上的民族的不满和分离主义愿望。这项研究考虑到罗马尼亚领土宣传在Csanád的表现形式- -更间接地在邻近的巴姆萨梅斯县- -不仅针对人数相对较少的罗马尼亚族人,而且也针对构成稍大社区的斯洛伐克人。虽然本研究的重点是罗马尼亚的宣传,但为了完整起见,也提到了塞尔维亚的宣传,因为塞尔维亚人也有影响Csanád县的领土愿望。这项研究的一个主要结论是,罗马尼亚的宣传主要集中于取得领土,而塞尔维亚的宣传则集中于争取人民,其最终形式是加强《特里亚农条约》所载的选择权利的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A LEGIO II ADIVTRIX centurióinak karrierjei Mátyás király emlékkönyv Statisztika-e az útleírás? A fakultatív hitoktatás a Rákosi-korszakban az adatok tükrében Grósz Károly útja Makón át Aradra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1