The Choice of the Paradigm of Discussion on the Right of Poland to Obtain Compensation From Germany Because of the WWII Aggression and Occupation

Przemysław Saganek
{"title":"The Choice of the Paradigm of Discussion on the Right of Poland to Obtain Compensation From Germany Because of the WWII Aggression and Occupation","authors":"Przemysław Saganek","doi":"10.15290/eejtr.2021.05.01.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The text is devoted to the choice of the paradigm of discussion on the right of Poland to obtain compensation from Germany in connection with the Second World War. In the opinion of the author the main failure of the hitherto discussion on the rights of Poland vis-a-vis Germany is a very infrequent reference to the rules on state responsibility. They are simple and lead to a very simple conclusion – namely the obligation of international law to pay a compensation which would wipe out all the consequences of the breach of international law. The author analyses in more detail the influence of the Potsdam Agreement and the 1953 declaration of the government of the Polish People’s Republic. In his opinion the Potsdam Agreement had no adverse effect on the scope of the Polish rights. While it is impossible to deny such an influence of the 1953 declaration, the author shows that even on a very wide interpretation it cannot be seen as a definitive end of all rights of Poland. The main message is that it is the set of psychological errors on the Polish side which make the discussion on the Polish rights so difficult and unfruitful.","PeriodicalId":34800,"journal":{"name":"Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/eejtr.2021.05.01.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The text is devoted to the choice of the paradigm of discussion on the right of Poland to obtain compensation from Germany in connection with the Second World War. In the opinion of the author the main failure of the hitherto discussion on the rights of Poland vis-a-vis Germany is a very infrequent reference to the rules on state responsibility. They are simple and lead to a very simple conclusion – namely the obligation of international law to pay a compensation which would wipe out all the consequences of the breach of international law. The author analyses in more detail the influence of the Potsdam Agreement and the 1953 declaration of the government of the Polish People’s Republic. In his opinion the Potsdam Agreement had no adverse effect on the scope of the Polish rights. While it is impossible to deny such an influence of the 1953 declaration, the author shows that even on a very wide interpretation it cannot be seen as a definitive end of all rights of Poland. The main message is that it is the set of psychological errors on the Polish side which make the discussion on the Polish rights so difficult and unfruitful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰因第二次世界大战侵略占领而获得德国赔偿的权利问题讨论范式的选择
本文致力于选择讨论波兰就第二次世界大战向德国索取赔偿的权利的范式。作者认为,迄今为止关于波兰对德国的权利的讨论的主要失败之处在于很少提及国家责任规则。它们很简单,并导致一个非常简单的结论- -即国际法有义务支付赔偿,以消除违反国际法的一切后果。作者更详细地分析了波茨坦协定和1953年波兰人民共和国政府宣言的影响。在他看来,《波茨坦协定》对波兰权利的范围没有不利影响。虽然不可能否认1953年宣言的这种影响,但提交人表明,即使在非常广泛的解释下,也不能将其视为波兰所有权利的最终终结。主要的信息是,波兰方面的一系列心理错误使得关于波兰权利的讨论如此困难和没有成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Legal aspects of green-branding The competitiveness of manufacturing in Poland and the other V4 countries against the backdrop of digital transformation challenges Energy security in Poland – transformation and role of nuclear energy New-Generation Trade Agreements and Their Importance to Trade Relations Between European Union and Third Countries – Vietnam Case Legal basis and practical dimensions of humanitarian aid and civil protection provided by the European Union
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1