Macroeconomic benefits of farmer-pastoralist peace in Nigeria’s Middle Belt: An input-output analysis approach

IF 1.1 Q3 ECONOMICS Economics of Peace and Security Journal Pub Date : 2015-04-01 DOI:10.15355/EPSJ.10.1.66
Topher L. McDougal, Talia Hagerty, Lisa Inks, C. Dowd, S. Conroy
{"title":"Macroeconomic benefits of farmer-pastoralist peace in Nigeria’s Middle Belt: An input-output analysis approach","authors":"Topher L. McDougal, Talia Hagerty, Lisa Inks, C. Dowd, S. Conroy","doi":"10.15355/EPSJ.10.1.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reports on the potential macroeconomic benefits of peace stemming from a reduction in farmer-pastoralist violence in four Middle Belt states of Nigeria (Benue, Kaduna, Nasarawa, and Plateau). Farmers and pastoralists routinely clash over access to farmland, grazing areas, stock routes, and water points for both animals and households. Farmer-pastoralist violence in these states is a relatively low-intensity form of conflict, but it is regionally widespread and chronic, and its incidence is arguably increasing. Using estimates of potential income benefits of peace at the household-level derived from a related study, we herein derive macroeconomic benefits via an input-output model of the Nigerian economy. We estimate these benefits to amount to around 2.8 percent of the nominal Nigerian GDP (or around 0.8 percent of the total Nigerian GDP, inclusive of the informal sector), representing a major macroeconomic opportunity. We break out these benefits by sector, showing that the sectors that stand to gain most from peace are the crop production, food and beverage, livestock, and chemical and petroleum industries.","PeriodicalId":43334,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Peace and Security Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"66-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Peace and Security Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15355/EPSJ.10.1.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This article reports on the potential macroeconomic benefits of peace stemming from a reduction in farmer-pastoralist violence in four Middle Belt states of Nigeria (Benue, Kaduna, Nasarawa, and Plateau). Farmers and pastoralists routinely clash over access to farmland, grazing areas, stock routes, and water points for both animals and households. Farmer-pastoralist violence in these states is a relatively low-intensity form of conflict, but it is regionally widespread and chronic, and its incidence is arguably increasing. Using estimates of potential income benefits of peace at the household-level derived from a related study, we herein derive macroeconomic benefits via an input-output model of the Nigerian economy. We estimate these benefits to amount to around 2.8 percent of the nominal Nigerian GDP (or around 0.8 percent of the total Nigerian GDP, inclusive of the informal sector), representing a major macroeconomic opportunity. We break out these benefits by sector, showing that the sectors that stand to gain most from peace are the crop production, food and beverage, livestock, and chemical and petroleum industries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼日利亚中部地区农牧民和平的宏观经济效益:投入产出分析方法
本文报道了尼日利亚中部地带四个州(贝努埃、卡杜纳、纳萨拉瓦和高原)农牧民暴力减少所带来的和平的潜在宏观经济效益。农民和牧民经常在进入农田、放牧区、牲畜路线以及牲畜和家庭的供水点等问题上发生冲突。这些州的农牧民暴力是一种强度相对较低的冲突形式,但它在区域内广泛存在且长期存在,而且其发生率可以说正在增加。根据相关研究得出的家庭层面和平的潜在收入效益估计,我们在此通过尼日利亚经济的投入产出模型得出宏观经济效益。我们估计,这些收益约占尼日利亚名义GDP的2.8%(或约占尼日利亚GDP总量的0.8%,包括非正规部门),这是一个重大的宏观经济机遇。我们将这些好处按行业分类,表明从和平中获益最多的行业是作物生产、食品和饮料、畜牧业、化学和石油工业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
The future of the European defense firm Strategic competition: Toward a genuine step-change for Europe’s defense industry? The future of cooperative programs in Europe, paradox of a hybrid market 50 shades of procurement: the European defense trilemma in defense procurement strategies Symposium introduction: European defense from the perspective of the Ukraine war
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1