Panorama general para el estudio de las actitudes lingüísticas ante la ortografía en los espacios de opinión pública de América y España en los siglos XVIII y XIX

IF 0.3 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ROMANISCHE PHILOLOGIE Pub Date : 2018-09-06 DOI:10.1515/zrp-2018-0052
Manuel Rivas Zancarrón
{"title":"Panorama general para el estudio de las actitudes lingüísticas ante la ortografía en los espacios de opinión pública de América y España en los siglos XVIII y XIX","authors":"Manuel Rivas Zancarrón","doi":"10.1515/zrp-2018-0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Spanish language underwent, from the point of view of the written standard, a series of changes that resolved the prevailing graphic chaos of the preceding centuries. This had been caused by continuous phonological adjustments. The creation of the Spanish Royal Academy (1713), as well as subsequent lexicographical and grammatical works, gradually standardised the orthography of those who used writing as a means to express thought. The objective of this article is to gather together a set of opinions of ordinary people present in the most important spaces of public opinion during the two centuries in question, in order to be able to determine in this way what influence was exerted by the academic body on this process of graphic normalisation and what impact their rules may have had on the different means of written dissemination: publishers, press and handwritten writing. From the methodological point of view, different discursive traditions are identified in order to observe the limits and scope in the acceptance or rejection of these new norms, and therefore to reach conclusions concerning different linguistic attitudes to the graphic system. The diverse opinions of grammarians, writers and non-specialists examined in this study may help to guide different approaches to possible linguistic change in graphic expression.","PeriodicalId":44119,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ROMANISCHE PHILOLOGIE","volume":"134 1","pages":"761 - 793"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/zrp-2018-0052","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ROMANISCHE PHILOLOGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrp-2018-0052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the Spanish language underwent, from the point of view of the written standard, a series of changes that resolved the prevailing graphic chaos of the preceding centuries. This had been caused by continuous phonological adjustments. The creation of the Spanish Royal Academy (1713), as well as subsequent lexicographical and grammatical works, gradually standardised the orthography of those who used writing as a means to express thought. The objective of this article is to gather together a set of opinions of ordinary people present in the most important spaces of public opinion during the two centuries in question, in order to be able to determine in this way what influence was exerted by the academic body on this process of graphic normalisation and what impact their rules may have had on the different means of written dissemination: publishers, press and handwritten writing. From the methodological point of view, different discursive traditions are identified in order to observe the limits and scope in the acceptance or rejection of these new norms, and therefore to reach conclusions concerning different linguistic attitudes to the graphic system. The diverse opinions of grammarians, writers and non-specialists examined in this study may help to guide different approaches to possible linguistic change in graphic expression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
18、19世纪美国和西班牙公众舆论空间中对正字法的语言态度研究概述
从书面标准的角度来看,在18世纪和19世纪,西班牙语经历了一系列的变化,解决了前几个世纪普遍存在的图形混乱。这是由不断的语音调整造成的。西班牙皇家学院(1713年)的成立,以及随后的词典编纂和语法工作,逐渐规范了那些用文字作为表达思想手段的人的正字法。本文的目的是收集两个世纪以来在最重要的公共舆论空间中出现的一组普通人的意见,以便能够以这种方式确定学术机构对这一图形规范化过程施加了什么影响,以及他们的规则可能对不同的书面传播手段产生了什么影响:出版商,报刊和手写。从方法论的角度来看,不同的话语传统是为了观察接受或拒绝这些新规范的限制和范围,从而得出关于不同语言对图形系统态度的结论。在这项研究中,语法学家、作家和非专业人士的不同观点可能有助于指导图形表达中可能发生的语言变化的不同方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The journal Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie (ZrP), was founded in 1877 by Gustav Gröber. In the field of literary history the subjects covered by the journal include Romance literature up to the Renaissance, as well as the entire scope of Romance language studies and related studies.
期刊最新文献
Frontmatter En torno al pseudoanglicismo acuñado por traducción The reflexes of Latin desinential rV in Romanian conjugation as examples of exaptive change La expresión de eventos de movimiento causativos mediante verbos de contacto por impacto en alemán y sus correspondencias en español Comparative reconstruction, phonosymbolism and Romance etymology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1