A “Creation of the Media”

IF 0.7 Q3 COMMUNICATION Feminist Media Histories Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1525/fmh.2022.8.4.85
Nancy Tomes
{"title":"A “Creation of the Media”","authors":"Nancy Tomes","doi":"10.1525/fmh.2022.8.4.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article revisits 1980s media coverage about the AIDS epidemic in the United States. Using insights from feminist media and affect theory, I examine the widespread perception that both science and journalism failed in their responsibility to report accurately about AIDS. The AIDS crisis intensified deep debates within both fields: about how scientists should translate complicated scientific issues into clear messaging about risk, and how reporters should frame and amplify those messages. Scientists and journalists also had to contend with new pressures from activists, “citizen scientists,” and conservative culture warriors. In battling over what should be reported about AIDS, scientists, journalists, and advocacy groups all accused their opponents of the sins of sensationalism and fearmongering. Revisiting these debates helps us understand today’s challenges around “risk messaging” about COVID-19 and the difficulties of differentiating between “healthy” and “unhealthy” fear.","PeriodicalId":36892,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Media Histories","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Media Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/fmh.2022.8.4.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This article revisits 1980s media coverage about the AIDS epidemic in the United States. Using insights from feminist media and affect theory, I examine the widespread perception that both science and journalism failed in their responsibility to report accurately about AIDS. The AIDS crisis intensified deep debates within both fields: about how scientists should translate complicated scientific issues into clear messaging about risk, and how reporters should frame and amplify those messages. Scientists and journalists also had to contend with new pressures from activists, “citizen scientists,” and conservative culture warriors. In battling over what should be reported about AIDS, scientists, journalists, and advocacy groups all accused their opponents of the sins of sensationalism and fearmongering. Revisiting these debates helps us understand today’s challenges around “risk messaging” about COVID-19 and the difficulties of differentiating between “healthy” and “unhealthy” fear.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“媒介的创造”
本文回顾了20世纪80年代媒体对美国艾滋病流行的报道。利用女权主义媒体和影响理论的见解,我研究了一种普遍的看法,即科学和新闻都没有尽到准确报道艾滋病的责任。艾滋病危机加剧了这两个领域的深刻争论:科学家应该如何将复杂的科学问题转化为关于风险的明确信息,以及记者应该如何构建和放大这些信息。科学家和记者还必须应对来自活动人士、“公民科学家”和保守文化斗士的新压力。在关于艾滋病应该报道什么的争论中,科学家、记者和倡导团体都指责他们的对手耸人听闻和制造恐慌的罪恶。回顾这些辩论有助于我们理解今天围绕COVID-19的“风险信息传递”所面临的挑战,以及区分“健康”和“不健康”恐惧的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Feminist Media Histories
Feminist Media Histories Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Letters, Queer and Women’s Comix, and Making Community Fire in the Hole Digital Pleasure and Danger LambdaMOO as Identitopia “Get out of here you anti”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1