Method for the evaluation of mitigation measures for soil loss compensation based on cadstral data

IF 0.4 4区 社会学 Q4 GEOGRAPHY Geodetski Vestnik Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2022.01.15-32
Mark a. Zupan
{"title":"Method for the evaluation of mitigation measures for soil loss compensation based on cadstral data","authors":"Mark a. Zupan","doi":"10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2022.01.15-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural soils are a non-renewable natural resource, and substitute land can only be acquired at the cost of losing other resources, such as forest ecosystems or restoring degraded land. An alternative is to improve soils of poorer quality through topsoil application and meliorative measures, thus increasing the production potential of existing agricultural land. In this paper, we present the measure of topsoil addition for maintaining production potential and the method of calculating the agricultural land equivalent (EKZ) to evaluate the impact of topsoil addition. The EKZ method was tested on hydromorphic and automorphic soils and on fragmented and consolidated agricultural land. The examples of EKZ calculation presented show that the addition of fertile topsoil can be an appropriate measure to mitigate the effects of soil sealing on the loss of production potential of agricultural land but not to the same extent for all soil types. The effect is greater when we improve low-quality soils such as gley soils or shallow soils with coarse particles. The EKZ method is objective, taking into account the original extent, land rating value, shape, and fragmentation of soils, as well as soils after topsoil has been added. The method also supports the rational use of the removed fertile soil and thus the conservation of a non- renewable natural resource.","PeriodicalId":44295,"journal":{"name":"Geodetski Vestnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodetski Vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15292/geodetski-vestnik.2022.01.15-32","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural soils are a non-renewable natural resource, and substitute land can only be acquired at the cost of losing other resources, such as forest ecosystems or restoring degraded land. An alternative is to improve soils of poorer quality through topsoil application and meliorative measures, thus increasing the production potential of existing agricultural land. In this paper, we present the measure of topsoil addition for maintaining production potential and the method of calculating the agricultural land equivalent (EKZ) to evaluate the impact of topsoil addition. The EKZ method was tested on hydromorphic and automorphic soils and on fragmented and consolidated agricultural land. The examples of EKZ calculation presented show that the addition of fertile topsoil can be an appropriate measure to mitigate the effects of soil sealing on the loss of production potential of agricultural land but not to the same extent for all soil types. The effect is greater when we improve low-quality soils such as gley soils or shallow soils with coarse particles. The EKZ method is objective, taking into account the original extent, land rating value, shape, and fragmentation of soils, as well as soils after topsoil has been added. The method also supports the rational use of the removed fertile soil and thus the conservation of a non- renewable natural resource.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于地籍资料的水土流失补偿缓解措施评价方法
农业土壤是一种不可再生的自然资源,只有以失去其他资源为代价才能获得替代土地,例如森林生态系统或恢复退化的土地。另一种方法是通过施用表土和改良措施来改善质量较差的土壤,从而增加现有农业用地的生产潜力。本文提出了表土添加量维持生产潜力的措施和计算农业用地当量(EKZ)的方法来评价表土添加量的影响。EKZ方法在水成土和自成土以及破碎化和固结农用地上进行了试验。EKZ计算实例表明,添加肥沃表土是缓解土壤封闭对农用地生产潜力损失影响的适当措施,但对所有土壤类型的影响程度不同。当我们改良低质量的土壤,如灰质土壤或粗颗粒的浅质土壤时,效果更大。EKZ方法是客观的,考虑了土壤的原始范围、土地等级值、形状和破碎性,以及添加表土后的土壤。该方法还支持合理利用被移走的肥沃土壤,从而保护不可再生的自然资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geodetski Vestnik
Geodetski Vestnik GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zveza geodetov Slovenije v skladu s svojim poslanstvom in s svojim statutom, izdaja znanstveno, strokovno in informativno glasilo Geodetski vestnik. Izhaja v nakladi 1200 izvodov. Objavlja znanstvene, strokovne in poljudno strokovne prispevke ter informacije. Revija je dostopna v večjem številu sekundarnih podatkovnih baz po svetu in mnogih knjižnicah. Od leta 2008 je vključena v Thomson Scientific bazo podatkov SCI. Cena izvoda revije je za nečlane 17 Evrov.
期刊最新文献
Graph-based analysis of the correlation between mobility and telecommunication Redevelopment of a manufacturing factory in an energy generation plant with wood biomass Modified method of deformation analysis according to the Munich approach Determining phenological phases of selected tree species with MODIS time-series data Triangle-based Horizontal Geodetic Datum Transformations in Bosnia and Herzegovina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1