A Monte Carlo Study of Design Procedures for the Semi-parametric Mixed Logit Model

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting Review of Marketing Science Pub Date : 2016-01-01 DOI:10.1515/roms-2014-0002
A. Falke, H. Hruschka
{"title":"A Monte Carlo Study of Design Procedures for the Semi-parametric Mixed Logit Model","authors":"A. Falke, H. Hruschka","doi":"10.1515/roms-2014-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We determine efficient designs for choice-based conjoint analysis for the semi-parametric mixed logit model which captures latent consumer heterogeneity in a very flexible way. Different methods constructing one or multiple designs are tested. Additionally we apply Halton draws and determine a minimum potential design for prior draws to reduce computation times caused by accounting for latent heterogeneity of consumers. As main efficiency criteria for the construction of designs we consider measures related to D-error and entropy. As additional benchmarks we generate designs both randomly and by an approach which starts from orthogonal designs developed for linear models. We compare these alternative design procedures by simulating choices for different constellations on the basis of the semi-parametric mixed logit model. Using these simulated choices we estimate parameters of the semi-parametric mixed logit model in the next step. ANOVA with root mean squared error between estimated and true coefficient values as dependent variable shows that performance of design procedures depends on dissimilarity and segment size. Following a mean-standard deviation approach we determine which procedure should be used under different constellations or lack of prior information. Overall, either constructing ten designs based on DB-error or constructing one design based on entropy turn out to be preferable.","PeriodicalId":35829,"journal":{"name":"Review of Marketing Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/roms-2014-0002","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Marketing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/roms-2014-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract We determine efficient designs for choice-based conjoint analysis for the semi-parametric mixed logit model which captures latent consumer heterogeneity in a very flexible way. Different methods constructing one or multiple designs are tested. Additionally we apply Halton draws and determine a minimum potential design for prior draws to reduce computation times caused by accounting for latent heterogeneity of consumers. As main efficiency criteria for the construction of designs we consider measures related to D-error and entropy. As additional benchmarks we generate designs both randomly and by an approach which starts from orthogonal designs developed for linear models. We compare these alternative design procedures by simulating choices for different constellations on the basis of the semi-parametric mixed logit model. Using these simulated choices we estimate parameters of the semi-parametric mixed logit model in the next step. ANOVA with root mean squared error between estimated and true coefficient values as dependent variable shows that performance of design procedures depends on dissimilarity and segment size. Following a mean-standard deviation approach we determine which procedure should be used under different constellations or lack of prior information. Overall, either constructing ten designs based on DB-error or constructing one design based on entropy turn out to be preferable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
半参数混合Logit模型设计过程的蒙特卡罗研究
我们确定了基于选择的半参数混合logit模型联合分析的有效设计,该模型以非常灵活的方式捕获潜在的消费者异质性。测试了构建一个或多个设计的不同方法。此外,我们应用Halton绘制并确定了最小潜在设计,以减少由于考虑消费者的潜在异质性而导致的计算时间。作为构建设计的主要效率标准,我们考虑了与d误差和熵相关的度量。作为额外的基准,我们随机生成设计,并通过一种从线性模型开发的正交设计开始的方法生成设计。我们在半参数混合logit模型的基础上,通过模拟不同星座的选择来比较这些备选设计程序。利用这些模拟选择,我们在下一步估计半参数混合logit模型的参数。以估计系数值和真实系数值之间的均方根误差为因变量的方差分析表明,设计程序的性能取决于不相似性和分段大小。根据平均-标准偏差方法,我们确定在不同星座或缺乏先验信息的情况下应使用哪种程序。总的来说,基于db误差构建十个设计或基于熵构建一个设计都是可取的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Marketing Science
Review of Marketing Science Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Review of Marketing Science (ROMS) is a peer-reviewed electronic-only journal whose mission is twofold: wide and rapid dissemination of the latest research in marketing, and one-stop review of important marketing research across the field, past and present. Unlike most marketing journals, ROMS is able to publish peer-reviewed articles immediately thanks to its electronic format. Electronic publication is designed to ensure speedy publication. It works in a very novel and simple way. An issue of ROMS opens and then closes after a year. All papers accepted during the year are part of the issue, and appear as soon as they are accepted. Combined with the rapid peer review process, this makes for quick dissemination.
期刊最新文献
Allurement of Augmented Reality on Behavioral Intention: Delineating the Role of Visual Appeal and Arousal Using Information System Success Model Authenticity as a Strategic Weapon: Navigating the Social Media Battlefield to Enhance Brand Loyalty Consumer Behaviour on AI Applications for Services: Measuring the Impact of Value-Based Adoption Model on Luxurious AI Resorts’ Applications The Prospection and Retrospection of Experiential Purchases as More Meaningful Memories: Social and Affective Implications Reduction of Ivory Product Purchase in China: The Role of Cultural Values on Ethical Consumption
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1