What is the “reflexive historicizing of communication”? A philosophical approach

Q3 Arts and Humanities Lingua Posnaniensis Pub Date : 2017-06-01 DOI:10.1515/linpo-2017-0008
Michael Wendland
{"title":"What is the “reflexive historicizing of communication”? A philosophical approach","authors":"Michael Wendland","doi":"10.1515/linpo-2017-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The purpose of this article is to interpret the term the “reflexive historicizing of communication” used by the editors of the Handbook of Communication History published in 2013. In the preface and in the first chapter, the editors introduce the above-mentioned concept, postulating that it is associated with the most important among several possible trends in communication history. Reflexive historicizing, as an important and innovative methodological directive, however, is described therein rather laconically. This article contains comments on both historicism and reflexivity. Their genesis is presented as well as their most important interpretations and possible applications in the social sciences. Particular attention is paid to the concept of historicism, since it is charged with numerous controversies and polemics (Karl Popper’s famous criticism). The main purpose of this article is to explain the meaning of historicism (and reflexivity) so as to avoid confusion and over-interpretation in the application of these concepts within communication history.","PeriodicalId":35103,"journal":{"name":"Lingua Posnaniensis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lingua Posnaniensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/linpo-2017-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this article is to interpret the term the “reflexive historicizing of communication” used by the editors of the Handbook of Communication History published in 2013. In the preface and in the first chapter, the editors introduce the above-mentioned concept, postulating that it is associated with the most important among several possible trends in communication history. Reflexive historicizing, as an important and innovative methodological directive, however, is described therein rather laconically. This article contains comments on both historicism and reflexivity. Their genesis is presented as well as their most important interpretations and possible applications in the social sciences. Particular attention is paid to the concept of historicism, since it is charged with numerous controversies and polemics (Karl Popper’s famous criticism). The main purpose of this article is to explain the meaning of historicism (and reflexivity) so as to avoid confusion and over-interpretation in the application of these concepts within communication history.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是“传播的反身性历史化”?哲学方法
摘要本文旨在对2013年出版的《传播史手册》编者使用的“传播的反思性历史化”一词进行解释。在前言和第一章中,编者介绍了上述概念,并假设它与传播史上几种可能趋势中最重要的趋势有关。然而,反思性历史化作为一种重要的、创新的方法论指导,在其中却被相当简洁地描述。这篇文章既有对历史决定论的评论,也有对反身性的评论。他们的起源,以及他们最重要的解释和可能的应用在社会科学。特别注意的是历史决定论的概念,因为它被指控有许多争议和论战(卡尔·波普尔的著名批评)。本文的主要目的是解释历史主义(和反身性)的含义,以避免在传播史中这些概念的应用中出现混淆和过度解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lingua Posnaniensis
Lingua Posnaniensis Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Temporal adverbial clauses: A cross-linguistic perspective Mubi-Toram lexicon and Afro-Asiatic IV: Addenda with *b- (Part 2) An Optimality-Theoretic analysis of stress in the Bani Sulaim dialect Angas-Sura etymologies XIII Mubi-Toram lexicon and Afro-Asiatic II: Addenda with *b-
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1