{"title":"DEVELOPMENT DIRECTIONS OF UKRAINE ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT GLOBALIZATION SCENARIOS","authors":"O. Dronova, Tymofii Nahornyi","doi":"10.15407/UGZ2021.02.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper identifies the features of participation of Ukraine in neoliberal globalization processes, as well as the course of the 2020-2021 Global hiatus related to the current world financial crisis, COVID-19 pandemic and the “great lockdown” as its consequence. Among others, the study methods include the analysis of relevant scientific publications, screening and content analysis of analytical sources, statistical reports and open media. The research goal is to forecast possible ways of socio-economic development of Ukraine after the COVID-19 crisis using the potential options of the global future proposed by A.T. Kearney (2016). Using SWOT analysis, the prospects for the development of Ukraine and its regions are detailed according to the four very different potential scenarios: globalization 3.0, polarization, islandization and commonization, that highlight the scientific novelty of the research. The most probable (symbiosis of globalization and polarization) and the most preferable (commonization) scenarios are determined. At the same time, a contribution to the international scientific discourse on the Global hiatus concept was made, as well as to the discussion on the importance of increasing the regulatory impact of state, in particular on social issues and environmental protection, and to the discourse on rejection of neoliberal fundamentalism with further transition to post-liberalism and alter-globalization. © 2021, National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":36917,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Geographical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"20-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Geographical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/UGZ2021.02.020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
乌克兰在不同全球化情景下的发展方向
本文确定了乌克兰参与新自由主义全球化进程的特点,以及与当前世界金融危机、COVID-19大流行及其后果“大封锁”相关的2020-2021年全球中断的过程。其中,研究方法包括对相关科学出版物的分析,对分析来源、统计报告和开放媒体的筛选和内容分析。研究目标是利用A.T. Kearney(2016)提出的全球未来的潜在选择,预测乌克兰在COVID-19危机后社会经济发展的可能方式。运用SWOT分析方法,根据全球化3.0、极化、孤岛化和通俗化四种截然不同的潜在情景,详细分析了乌克兰及其地区的发展前景,凸显了研究的科学新颖性。确定了最可能的(全球化和两极分化的共生)和最可取的(通俗化)情景。同时,对全球中断概念的国际科学论述做出了贡献,以及对增加国家监管影响的重要性的讨论,特别是在社会问题和环境保护方面,以及对拒绝新自由主义原教旨主义的论述,进一步过渡到后自由主义和改变全球化。©2021,美国国家科学院。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。