Preliminary evidence for the Matrix Matching Test as a valid and reliable measure of general cognitive ability in adolescents

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia Pub Date : 2021-11-30 DOI:10.14349/rlp.2021.v53.17
Graham Pluck
{"title":"Preliminary evidence for the Matrix Matching Test as a valid and reliable measure of general cognitive ability in adolescents","authors":"Graham Pluck","doi":"10.14349/rlp.2021.v53.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In research, a simple measure of general cognitive ability is often required. One method is the Matrix Matching Test, a brief, free-to-use, language-free assessment of general cognitive ability or intelligence in adults, which taps both fluid and crystalized processes. We investigated its reliability and validity with adolescent participants. Method:The Matrix Matching Test was administered to 111 participants, aged 12 to 17 (46% female).Subsamples also completed two standard measures of cognitive ability: Vocabulary (crystalized) and Matrix Reasoning (fluid) tests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV (WISC-IV). Results: The Matrix Matching Test was found to have acceptable internal consistency and good retest reliability. Criterion validity was indicated by its ability to distinguish between psychosocially deprived participants living in foster care (n = 40) and controls, and by its positive correlation with grade point average. There were large positive correlations between the Matrix Matching Test and the standard measures of Vocabulary, and Matrix Reasoning, suggesting convergent validity. Conclusions: Our preliminary evidence suggests that The Matrix Matching Test is a reliable and valid measure of general cognitive ability for ages 12 to 17.","PeriodicalId":46559,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2021.v53.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In research, a simple measure of general cognitive ability is often required. One method is the Matrix Matching Test, a brief, free-to-use, language-free assessment of general cognitive ability or intelligence in adults, which taps both fluid and crystalized processes. We investigated its reliability and validity with adolescent participants. Method:The Matrix Matching Test was administered to 111 participants, aged 12 to 17 (46% female).Subsamples also completed two standard measures of cognitive ability: Vocabulary (crystalized) and Matrix Reasoning (fluid) tests from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV (WISC-IV). Results: The Matrix Matching Test was found to have acceptable internal consistency and good retest reliability. Criterion validity was indicated by its ability to distinguish between psychosocially deprived participants living in foster care (n = 40) and controls, and by its positive correlation with grade point average. There were large positive correlations between the Matrix Matching Test and the standard measures of Vocabulary, and Matrix Reasoning, suggesting convergent validity. Conclusions: Our preliminary evidence suggests that The Matrix Matching Test is a reliable and valid measure of general cognitive ability for ages 12 to 17.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
矩阵匹配测验作为青少年一般认知能力的有效和可靠测量的初步证据
在研究中,通常需要对一般认知能力进行简单的测量。其中一种方法是矩阵匹配测试(Matrix Matching Test),这是一种简短、免费使用、不需要语言的成人一般认知能力或智力评估,它既利用了流体过程,也利用了结晶过程。我们在青少年参与者中调查了它的信度和效度。方法:对111名12 ~ 17岁的参与者进行矩阵匹配测试(46%为女性)。子样本还完成了认知能力的两项标准测量:韦氏儿童智力量表IV (WISC-IV)中的词汇(结晶)和矩阵推理(流体)测试。结果:矩阵匹配检验具有良好的内部一致性和良好的重测信度。标准效度通过其区分寄养家庭(n = 40)和对照组的心理社会剥夺参与者的能力以及其与平均成绩的正相关来表明。矩阵匹配测验与词汇量和矩阵推理的标准测量之间存在显著的正相关,表明趋同效度。结论:我们的初步证据表明,矩阵匹配测试是一个可靠和有效的测量一般认知能力为12至17岁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Revista latinoamericana de Psicología (RLP) is a four month publication from Konrad Lorenz Fundación Universitaria. The RLP evaluates works that belong to one of the following categories: original papers (with empiric and new information) of many psychology fields (regardless of the methodology used) or qualitative/quantitative systematic reviews. Eventually it will be interested on works’ revision related to the development psychology tools or softwares, original methodology papers and researches which evaluate psychology from scientometry. The RLP is not interested in publishing non-systematic reviews or states of the art, case studies, protocols studies, hypothesis or papers proposals, letters, commentaries or essays, opinions articles, politics documents nor other sort of secondary literature. Traditionally, there have been monographics, books’ reviews and “others” published in “Mundo de la Psicología”, nevertheless these modalities will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Actitudes desde la clase social baja hacia la clase social alta: el papel del contacto y la ansiedad intergrupal Efectos de la modalidad de presentación de un mensaje de educación-entretenimiento de prevención del VIH Concerns About Inequality in Health, Education and Income Jointly Predict Collective Actions Cross-cultural adaptation of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II (SMQ-II) for Portuguesespeaking Brazilian secondary school students Psychometric properties of the Entrepreneurial Intention Questionnaire (EIQ) in Dominican Republic adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1