Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): An update of the literature and instrumental study with schoolchildren

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.16
C. Costa-Ball, C. Cracco, Ariel Cuadro, Juan José López García
{"title":"Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): An update of the literature and instrumental study with schoolchildren","authors":"C. Costa-Ball, C. Cracco, Ariel Cuadro, Juan José López García","doi":"10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Considering the current controversy regarding the factorial structure of the SDQ, this paper aimed to analyse the dimensionality and reliability of the parents’ version for children from 4 to 16 years of age, and to present descriptive data according to sociodemographic variables. Method: The factor structure of the original five- and three-factor models, and the reliability of the SDQ were examined among a sample of 621 parents of Uruguayan children between 7 and 12 years of age (52% girls) from different socioeconomic levels. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses did not provide support for the five- and three-factor models. Data adjusted to three factors (prosociality, externalising symptoms, internalising symptoms) in an exploratory analysis with adequate reliability indices. Conclusions: The results of this study show the relevance of continued investigation of the SDQ internal structure, and further analysis of the behaviour of several of its items.","PeriodicalId":46559,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2023.v55.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Considering the current controversy regarding the factorial structure of the SDQ, this paper aimed to analyse the dimensionality and reliability of the parents’ version for children from 4 to 16 years of age, and to present descriptive data according to sociodemographic variables. Method: The factor structure of the original five- and three-factor models, and the reliability of the SDQ were examined among a sample of 621 parents of Uruguayan children between 7 and 12 years of age (52% girls) from different socioeconomic levels. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses did not provide support for the five- and three-factor models. Data adjusted to three factors (prosociality, externalising symptoms, internalising symptoms) in an exploratory analysis with adequate reliability indices. Conclusions: The results of this study show the relevance of continued investigation of the SDQ internal structure, and further analysis of the behaviour of several of its items.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优势与困难问卷(SDQ):对小学生的文献和工具研究的更新
引言:考虑到目前关于SDQ的析因结构存在争议,本文旨在分析4 - 16岁儿童父母版本的维度和信度,并根据社会人口学变量提供描述性数据。方法:对来自不同社会经济水平的乌拉圭7 - 12岁儿童(52%为女孩)的621名父母样本进行了五因素模型和三因素模型的因素结构和SDQ的信度检验。结果:验证性因子分析不支持五因子和三因子模型。数据调整为三个因素(亲社会,外化症状,内化症状),探索性分析具有足够的可靠性指数。结论:本研究的结果表明,继续调查SDQ内部结构,并进一步分析其几个项目的行为的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Revista latinoamericana de Psicología (RLP) is a four month publication from Konrad Lorenz Fundación Universitaria. The RLP evaluates works that belong to one of the following categories: original papers (with empiric and new information) of many psychology fields (regardless of the methodology used) or qualitative/quantitative systematic reviews. Eventually it will be interested on works’ revision related to the development psychology tools or softwares, original methodology papers and researches which evaluate psychology from scientometry. The RLP is not interested in publishing non-systematic reviews or states of the art, case studies, protocols studies, hypothesis or papers proposals, letters, commentaries or essays, opinions articles, politics documents nor other sort of secondary literature. Traditionally, there have been monographics, books’ reviews and “others” published in “Mundo de la Psicología”, nevertheless these modalities will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Actitudes desde la clase social baja hacia la clase social alta: el papel del contacto y la ansiedad intergrupal Efectos de la modalidad de presentación de un mensaje de educación-entretenimiento de prevención del VIH Concerns About Inequality in Health, Education and Income Jointly Predict Collective Actions Cross-cultural adaptation of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II (SMQ-II) for Portuguesespeaking Brazilian secondary school students Psychometric properties of the Entrepreneurial Intention Questionnaire (EIQ) in Dominican Republic adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1