King Saud University’ Medical Students Research Experience: A Mixed-Methodology Study

Abdulaziz A. Alodhayani, I. Gosadi, M. M. A. Daajani, Salah Ezreqat, H. Mourad, Firas Ghomraoui, Tahani Jathab Alshaibani
{"title":"King Saud University’ Medical Students Research Experience: A Mixed-Methodology Study","authors":"Abdulaziz A. Alodhayani, I. Gosadi, M. M. A. Daajani, Salah Ezreqat, H. Mourad, Firas Ghomraoui, Tahani Jathab Alshaibani","doi":"10.15406/moji.2016.04.00141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"King Saud University’s (KSU) medical students are educated on research methodology through a mandatory course. This investigation aims to evaluate these students’ research experience. This is a mixed-methodology study undertaken at the medical college KSU. Four focus groups were performed to allow an in-depth analysis of factors affecting KSU medical students’ research experiences. The qualitative aspect was followed by a quantitative survey to evaluate the KSU medical college faculty’s perception of undergraduate students’ supervisory mission. A total of 49 participants were involved in this study. Thirty-one students participated in the qualitative part. However, only 18 faculty members responded to the online questionnaire (a response rate of 18%). The thematic analysis produced three main themes and 12 subthemes. The main themes were related to organizational factors influencing students’ research experience, how they conducted research and their research outcomes. Quantitative analysis findings indicated that the majority of supervisors think that students’ research weaknesses are related to the development of the research questions, statistical analysis and scientific writing. There is a need to revisit the curriculum structure of KSU medical college and minimize the interference between research and clinical education, and examinations. More emphasis should be given to providing practical training in statistics, scientific writing and supervisory experience enhancement.","PeriodicalId":90928,"journal":{"name":"MOJ immunology","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOJ immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/moji.2016.04.00141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

King Saud University’s (KSU) medical students are educated on research methodology through a mandatory course. This investigation aims to evaluate these students’ research experience. This is a mixed-methodology study undertaken at the medical college KSU. Four focus groups were performed to allow an in-depth analysis of factors affecting KSU medical students’ research experiences. The qualitative aspect was followed by a quantitative survey to evaluate the KSU medical college faculty’s perception of undergraduate students’ supervisory mission. A total of 49 participants were involved in this study. Thirty-one students participated in the qualitative part. However, only 18 faculty members responded to the online questionnaire (a response rate of 18%). The thematic analysis produced three main themes and 12 subthemes. The main themes were related to organizational factors influencing students’ research experience, how they conducted research and their research outcomes. Quantitative analysis findings indicated that the majority of supervisors think that students’ research weaknesses are related to the development of the research questions, statistical analysis and scientific writing. There is a need to revisit the curriculum structure of KSU medical college and minimize the interference between research and clinical education, and examinations. More emphasis should be given to providing practical training in statistics, scientific writing and supervisory experience enhancement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙特国王大学医学生研究经验:一项混合方法研究
沙特国王大学(KSU)的医科学生通过必修课程学习研究方法。本次调查旨在评估这些学生的研究经历。这是在KSU医学院进行的一项混合方法研究。为了深入分析影响本校医学生研究经历的因素,我们进行了四个焦点小组讨论。本研究以定性调查为主,以定量调查为主,评估本校医学院教职员对本科生督导使命的认知。共有49名参与者参与了这项研究。31名学生参加了定性部分。然而,只有18名教师回应了在线问卷(回复率为18%)。专题分析产生了三个主题和12个次级主题。主要主题是影响学生研究经历的组织因素、他们如何进行研究以及他们的研究成果。定量分析结果表明,大多数导师认为学生的研究弱点与研究问题的发展、统计分析和科学写作有关。有必要重新检讨高丽大学医学院的课程结构,尽量减少研究与临床教育、考试之间的干扰。应更加强调提供统计、科学写作和提高管理经验方面的实际培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19-A theory of autoimmunity to ACE-2. A novel marker in patients with alopecia areata STK4 (MST1) loss of function mutation: a cocktail of combined immune deficiency diseases Role of bacterial infection in the development and progression of gastric cancers Tuberculosis at the socialized patients without comorbidity in different age groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1