Detection of antibodies to erythropoietin-based drugs: is it possible to create the universal test system?

A. Kudryashova, A. Borisov, A. Koltsova, A. Pushkina, O. Borisova
{"title":"Detection of antibodies to erythropoietin-based drugs: is it possible to create the universal test system?","authors":"A. Kudryashova, A. Borisov, A. Koltsova, A. Pushkina, O. Borisova","doi":"10.15789/1563-0625-doa-2169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our aim was to compare different immobilized erythropoietin (EPO) preparations for their ability to detect anti-EPO IgG antibodies in blood sera of EPO-treated patients with ELISA technique. 294 serum samples of the patients treated with erythropoietin were analyzed. 127 serum samples of patients who did not receive recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) were studied for comparative analysis. ELISA assay was performed, and different rhEPO drugs were immobilized on the anti-EPO monoclonal antibody-coated plates. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated mouse monoclonal antibodies to human IgG, IgG1, and IgG4 was used for detection. The following drugs were studied: recombinant human erythropoietin rhEPO-beta (Shandong Kexing Bioproducts), European standard of erythropoietin BRP 3, commercial drugs Aranesp (Amgen Europe B.V.), Mircera (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.), Eprex (Johnson & Johnson LLC), Eralfon (Pharmaceutical Company Sotex). The sensitivity of the method was expressed as a positivity index (IP). IP calculated as the ratio of OD from tested sera to OD at the cut-off levels. The latter was assumed as a mean OD±SD for serum samples from EPO-naive patients. The results were evaluated as positive with IP > 1.1, and negative at IP < 0.9. Results in the range of 0.9 ≤ IP < 1.1 were considered as unidentified. Among the 294 samples, 32 specimens were evaluated as positive or unidentified for total IgG anti-EPO antibodies. The unidentified samples were detected in 1.0-1.7% of all cases. IgG1 subclass antibodies were found in 50-56.3% of patients and IgG4 subclass antibodies, in 43.850% of the patients. Mann—Whitney test showed a significant difference between the test samples compared to control group for all the ELISA modifications (p = 0.001). The Kruskal—Wallis test did not show significant differences between the IP results obtained with any of five immobilized EPO drugs (p = 0.05). The correlation quotient of IP was in the range of 0.99-0.96 for total IgG and > 0.98 for two subclasses of antibodies. Linear regression coefficients were close to one, thus indicating absence of significant differences in the sensitivity of the compared methods. This study indicate the opportunity of using the similar test systems to determine anti-EPO antibodies in the patients treated with various rhEPO drugs. Therefore, it is possible to develop a universal commercial test system to this purpose.","PeriodicalId":85139,"journal":{"name":"Medical immunology (London, England)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical immunology (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15789/1563-0625-doa-2169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our aim was to compare different immobilized erythropoietin (EPO) preparations for their ability to detect anti-EPO IgG antibodies in blood sera of EPO-treated patients with ELISA technique. 294 serum samples of the patients treated with erythropoietin were analyzed. 127 serum samples of patients who did not receive recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) were studied for comparative analysis. ELISA assay was performed, and different rhEPO drugs were immobilized on the anti-EPO monoclonal antibody-coated plates. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated mouse monoclonal antibodies to human IgG, IgG1, and IgG4 was used for detection. The following drugs were studied: recombinant human erythropoietin rhEPO-beta (Shandong Kexing Bioproducts), European standard of erythropoietin BRP 3, commercial drugs Aranesp (Amgen Europe B.V.), Mircera (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.), Eprex (Johnson & Johnson LLC), Eralfon (Pharmaceutical Company Sotex). The sensitivity of the method was expressed as a positivity index (IP). IP calculated as the ratio of OD from tested sera to OD at the cut-off levels. The latter was assumed as a mean OD±SD for serum samples from EPO-naive patients. The results were evaluated as positive with IP > 1.1, and negative at IP < 0.9. Results in the range of 0.9 ≤ IP < 1.1 were considered as unidentified. Among the 294 samples, 32 specimens were evaluated as positive or unidentified for total IgG anti-EPO antibodies. The unidentified samples were detected in 1.0-1.7% of all cases. IgG1 subclass antibodies were found in 50-56.3% of patients and IgG4 subclass antibodies, in 43.850% of the patients. Mann—Whitney test showed a significant difference between the test samples compared to control group for all the ELISA modifications (p = 0.001). The Kruskal—Wallis test did not show significant differences between the IP results obtained with any of five immobilized EPO drugs (p = 0.05). The correlation quotient of IP was in the range of 0.99-0.96 for total IgG and > 0.98 for two subclasses of antibodies. Linear regression coefficients were close to one, thus indicating absence of significant differences in the sensitivity of the compared methods. This study indicate the opportunity of using the similar test systems to determine anti-EPO antibodies in the patients treated with various rhEPO drugs. Therefore, it is possible to develop a universal commercial test system to this purpose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以促红细胞生成素为基础的药物抗体的检测:是否有可能建立一个通用的检测系统?
我们的目的是比较不同的固定化促红细胞生成素(EPO)制剂在用ELISA技术检测促红细胞生成素治疗患者血清中抗促红细胞生成素IgG抗体的能力。对294例接受促红细胞生成素治疗的患者进行血清分析。对未接受重组人促红细胞生成素(rhEPO)治疗的127例患者的血清样本进行比较分析。采用ELISA法,将不同的rhEPO药物固定在抗epo单克隆抗体包被板上。用辣根过氧化物酶偶联的小鼠抗人IgG、IgG1和IgG4单克隆抗体进行检测。研究的药物有:重组人促红细胞生成素rhepo - β(山东科兴生物制品公司)、欧洲标准促红细胞生成素brp3、商品药Aranesp (Amgen Europe B.V.)、Mircera (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.)、Eprex(强生公司)、Eralfon (Sotex制药公司)。方法的灵敏度用阳性指数(positive index, IP)表示。IP计算为检测血清OD与截止水平OD的比值。后者被假定为epo初发患者血清样本的平均OD±SD。结果在IP < 1.1时为阳性,IP < 0.9时为阴性。结果在0.9≤IP < 1.1范围内视为未识别。294份标本中,32份总IgG抗epo抗体阳性或鉴定不清。未识别样本占所有病例的1.0-1.7%。50 ~ 56.3%的患者存在IgG1亚型抗体,43.850%的患者存在IgG4亚型抗体。Mann-Whitney检验显示,与对照组相比,所有ELISA修饰的检测样本之间存在显著差异(p = 0.001)。Kruskal-Wallis试验没有显示5种固定EPO药物的IP结果有显著差异(p = 0.05)。总IgG的相关商数为0.99 ~ 0.96,两类抗体的相关商数为bb0 ~ 0.98。线性回归系数接近于1,表明比较方法的灵敏度没有显著差异。这项研究表明,使用类似的测试系统来确定各种rhEPO药物治疗患者的抗epo抗体是有机会的。因此,有可能为此目的开发一个通用的商业测试系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Обоснование эффективности применения медикопсихологической реабилитации и цифровой психофизиологической терапии в регуляции формирования атеросклеротического процесса на уровне нейропептидно-цитокиновыхзвеньев иммунной системы при полиморбидной сердечно-сосудистой патологии, протекающей на фоне расс HLA diversity in the Russian population assessed by next generation sequencing Basophil activation: theoretical aspects and use in the diagnosis of allergic diseases Complex estimation of mitochondrial changes of immunocompetent blood cells in pregnant women with urgent and premature birth Detection of antibodies to erythropoietin-based drugs: is it possible to create the universal test system?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1