{"title":"Aelius Aristides' Sacred Tales: A Study of the Creation of the “Narrative about Asclepius”","authors":"A. Tagliabue","doi":"10.1525/CA.2016.35.1.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aelius Aristides’ Sacred Tales is a complex literary text, and its first book—the diary—puzzles scholars, \nas it has no parallel in the entire work. This paper offers a justification for this section by arguing \nfor a deliberate contrast between the diary and Books 2–6 of the Sacred Tales, as a result of which the \nlatter section is crafted as a narrative about Asclepius. I will first identify a large series of shifts in the \nST: starting with Book 2, change concerns the protagonist, which from Aristides’ abdomen turns to \nAsclepius, the narrator, dream interpretation, genre, and arrangement of the events. Secondly, I discuss \nthe impact of these shifts upon the readers’ response: while the diary invites the readers to relive \nthe everyday tension between known past and unknown future, the spatial form of Books 2–6 creates \nthe opposite effect, turning the readers’ attention away from the human flow of time towards Asclepius, \nand leading them to perceive features of his divine time.","PeriodicalId":45164,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY","volume":"35 1","pages":"126-146"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1525/CA.2016.35.1.126","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL ANTIQUITY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/CA.2016.35.1.126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Aelius Aristides’ Sacred Tales is a complex literary text, and its first book—the diary—puzzles scholars,
as it has no parallel in the entire work. This paper offers a justification for this section by arguing
for a deliberate contrast between the diary and Books 2–6 of the Sacred Tales, as a result of which the
latter section is crafted as a narrative about Asclepius. I will first identify a large series of shifts in the
ST: starting with Book 2, change concerns the protagonist, which from Aristides’ abdomen turns to
Asclepius, the narrator, dream interpretation, genre, and arrangement of the events. Secondly, I discuss
the impact of these shifts upon the readers’ response: while the diary invites the readers to relive
the everyday tension between known past and unknown future, the spatial form of Books 2–6 creates
the opposite effect, turning the readers’ attention away from the human flow of time towards Asclepius,
and leading them to perceive features of his divine time.