Risk assessment of parabens in a transcriptomics-based in vitro test

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Chemico-Biological Interactions Pub Date : 2023-09-09 DOI:10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110699
Florian Seidel , Franziska Kappenberg , Susann Fayyaz , Andreas Scholtz-Illigens , Anna Cherianidou , Katharina Derksen , Patrick Nell , Rosemarie Marchan , Karolina Edlund , Marcel Leist , Agapios Sachinidis , Jörg Rahnenführer , Reinhard Kreiling , Jan G. Hengstler
{"title":"Risk assessment of parabens in a transcriptomics-based in vitro test","authors":"Florian Seidel ,&nbsp;Franziska Kappenberg ,&nbsp;Susann Fayyaz ,&nbsp;Andreas Scholtz-Illigens ,&nbsp;Anna Cherianidou ,&nbsp;Katharina Derksen ,&nbsp;Patrick Nell ,&nbsp;Rosemarie Marchan ,&nbsp;Karolina Edlund ,&nbsp;Marcel Leist ,&nbsp;Agapios Sachinidis ,&nbsp;Jörg Rahnenführer ,&nbsp;Reinhard Kreiling ,&nbsp;Jan G. Hengstler","doi":"10.1016/j.cbi.2023.110699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Parabens have been used for decades as preservatives in food, drugs and cosmetics. The majority however, were banned in 2009 and 2014 leaving only methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, and butyl-derivates available for subsequent use. Methyl- and </span>propylparaben have been extensively tested in vivo, with no resulting evidence for developmental and </span>reproductive toxicity<span> (DART). In contrast, ethylparaben has not yet been tested for DART in animal experiments, and it is currently debated if additional animal studies are warranted. In order to perform a comparison of the four currently approved parabens, we used a previously established in vitro test based on human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) that are exposed to test substances during their differentiation to neuroectodermal cells. EC</span></span><sub>50</sub><span><span> values for cytotoxicity were 906 μM, 698 μM, 216 μM and 63 μM for methyl-, ethyl-, propyl- and butylparaben<span>, respectively, demonstrating that cytotoxicity increases with increasing alkyl chain length. Genome-wide analysis demonstrated that FDR-adjusted significant gene expression changes occurred only at cytotoxic or close to cytotoxic concentrations, for example 1720 differentially expressed genes (DEG) at 1000 μM ethylparaben, 1 DEG at 316 μM, and no DEG at 100 μM or lower concentrations. The highest concentration of ethylparaben that did not induce any cytotoxicity nor DEG was 1670-fold above the highest concentration reported in biomonitoring studies (60 nM ethylparaben in cord blood). In conclusion, cytotoxicity and gene expression alterations of ethylparaben occurred at concentrations of approximately three orders of magnitude above human blood concentrations; moreover, the substance fitted well into a scenario where toxicity increases with the alkyl chain length, and gene expression changes only occur at cytotoxic or close to cytotoxic concentrations. Therefore, no evidence was obtained suggesting that in vivo DART with ethylparaben would lead to different results as the methyl- or </span></span>propyl derivates.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":274,"journal":{"name":"Chemico-Biological Interactions","volume":"384 ","pages":"Article 110699"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemico-Biological Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009279723003666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parabens have been used for decades as preservatives in food, drugs and cosmetics. The majority however, were banned in 2009 and 2014 leaving only methyl-, ethyl-, propyl-, and butyl-derivates available for subsequent use. Methyl- and propylparaben have been extensively tested in vivo, with no resulting evidence for developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART). In contrast, ethylparaben has not yet been tested for DART in animal experiments, and it is currently debated if additional animal studies are warranted. In order to perform a comparison of the four currently approved parabens, we used a previously established in vitro test based on human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) that are exposed to test substances during their differentiation to neuroectodermal cells. EC50 values for cytotoxicity were 906 μM, 698 μM, 216 μM and 63 μM for methyl-, ethyl-, propyl- and butylparaben, respectively, demonstrating that cytotoxicity increases with increasing alkyl chain length. Genome-wide analysis demonstrated that FDR-adjusted significant gene expression changes occurred only at cytotoxic or close to cytotoxic concentrations, for example 1720 differentially expressed genes (DEG) at 1000 μM ethylparaben, 1 DEG at 316 μM, and no DEG at 100 μM or lower concentrations. The highest concentration of ethylparaben that did not induce any cytotoxicity nor DEG was 1670-fold above the highest concentration reported in biomonitoring studies (60 nM ethylparaben in cord blood). In conclusion, cytotoxicity and gene expression alterations of ethylparaben occurred at concentrations of approximately three orders of magnitude above human blood concentrations; moreover, the substance fitted well into a scenario where toxicity increases with the alkyl chain length, and gene expression changes only occur at cytotoxic or close to cytotoxic concentrations. Therefore, no evidence was obtained suggesting that in vivo DART with ethylparaben would lead to different results as the methyl- or propyl derivates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于转录组学的对羟基苯甲酸酯体外试验的风险评估
几十年来,对羟基苯甲酸酯一直被用作食品、药品和化妆品的防腐剂。然而,大多数在2009年和2014年被禁止使用,只留下甲基、乙基、丙基和丁基衍生物可供后续使用。对羟基苯甲酸甲酯和丙基对羟基苯甲酸酯进行了广泛的体内测试,没有发现发育和生殖毒性(DART)的证据。相比之下,对羟基苯甲酸乙酯尚未在动物实验中进行DART测试,目前是否有必要进行额外的动物研究仍存在争议。为了对目前批准的四种对羟基苯甲酸酯进行比较,我们使用了先前建立的基于人类诱导多能干细胞(iPSC)的体外试验,这些干细胞在分化为神经外胚层细胞的过程中暴露于测试物质。对羟基苯甲酸甲酯、对羟基苯甲酸乙酯、对羟基苯甲酸丙酯和对羟基苯甲酸丁酯的细胞毒性EC50值分别为906 μM、698 μM、216 μM和63 μM,表明细胞毒性随烷基链长度的增加而增加。全基因组分析表明,fdr调节的显著基因表达变化仅在细胞毒性或接近细胞毒性浓度时发生,例如,在1000 μM对羟基苯甲酸乙酯浓度下有1720个差异表达基因(DEG),在316 μM浓度下有1个差异表达基因(DEG),而在100 μM或更低浓度下没有差异表达基因(DEG)。对羟基苯甲酸乙酯未引起任何细胞毒性和DEG的最高浓度是生物监测研究中报道的最高浓度(脐带血中60 nM对羟基苯甲酸乙酯)的1670倍。综上所述,对羟基苯甲酸乙酯的细胞毒性和基因表达改变发生在浓度大约比人血药浓度高3个数量级的情况下;此外,该物质很好地符合毒性随烷基链长度增加而增加的情况,并且基因表达变化仅发生在细胞毒性或接近细胞毒性浓度时。因此,没有证据表明含有对羟基苯甲酸乙酯的体内DART会导致与甲基或丙基衍生物不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
410
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Chemico-Biological Interactions publishes research reports and review articles that examine the molecular, cellular, and/or biochemical basis of toxicologically relevant outcomes. Special emphasis is placed on toxicological mechanisms associated with interactions between chemicals and biological systems. Outcomes may include all traditional endpoints caused by synthetic or naturally occurring chemicals, both in vivo and in vitro. Endpoints of interest include, but are not limited to carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, respiratory toxicology, neurotoxicology, reproductive and developmental toxicology, and immunotoxicology.
期刊最新文献
Glycerophospholipid metabolic disorders and gender difference of cantharidin-induced hepatotoxicity in rats: Lipidomics and MALDI mass spectrometry imaging analysis Exploring the nephrotoxicity and molecular mechanisms of Di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate: A comprehensive review Copper oxide nanoparticles induced reactive oxygen species generation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Toxicological effects and potential reproductive risk of microplastic-induced molecular changes in protamine-like proteins and their DNA binding Diosgenin attenuates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease through mTOR-mediated inhibition of lipid accumulation and inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1