MODELING PERCEPTUAL LEARNING: WHY MICE DO NOT PLAY BACKGAMMON

Elisa M. Tartaglia, K. Aberg, M. Herzog
{"title":"MODELING PERCEPTUAL LEARNING: WHY MICE DO NOT PLAY BACKGAMMON","authors":"Elisa M. Tartaglia, K. Aberg, M. Herzog","doi":"10.1556/LP.1.2009.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perceptual learning is often considered one of the simplest and basic forms of learning in general. Accordingly, it is usually modeled with simple and basic neural networks which show good results in grasping the empirical data. Simple meets simple. Complex forms of perception and learning are, then, thought to rely on these simple networks. Here, we will argue that the simplicity is in fact the Achilles heel of models of perceptual learning. We propose, instead, that perceptual learning of simple stimuli cannot be modeled with simple networks. We will review some of the empirical results yielding to this conclusion","PeriodicalId":88573,"journal":{"name":"Learning & perception","volume":"1 1","pages":"155-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & perception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/LP.1.2009.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Perceptual learning is often considered one of the simplest and basic forms of learning in general. Accordingly, it is usually modeled with simple and basic neural networks which show good results in grasping the empirical data. Simple meets simple. Complex forms of perception and learning are, then, thought to rely on these simple networks. Here, we will argue that the simplicity is in fact the Achilles heel of models of perceptual learning. We propose, instead, that perceptual learning of simple stimuli cannot be modeled with simple networks. We will review some of the empirical results yielding to this conclusion
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建模感知学习:为什么老鼠不玩西洋双陆棋
感知学习通常被认为是最简单和基本的学习形式之一。因此,通常使用简单的基本神经网络进行建模,在掌握经验数据方面效果良好。简单遇上简单。因此,复杂的感知和学习形式被认为依赖于这些简单的网络。在这里,我们将论证简单性实际上是感知学习模型的致命弱点。相反,我们提出,简单刺激的感知学习不能用简单的网络来建模。我们将回顾一些得出这一结论的实证结果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On transfer during problem solving Measuring pre-reflexive consciousness: The Hungarian validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) Different roles of similarity and predictability in auditory stream segregation The role of perceived source location in auditory stream segregation: Separation affects sound organization, common fate does not Perceptual bistability in auditory streaming: How much do stimulus features matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1