Impact of verbal instructions on pelvic floor contraction in the immediate postpartum

Q4 Medicine Fisioterapia em Movimento Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/fm.2022.356010
Andressa Soares de Azevedo, I. Frota, Amene Cidrão Lima, Glaucia Nunes Diniz de Oliveira, M. A. Moreira, S. Nascimento
{"title":"Impact of verbal instructions on pelvic floor contraction in the immediate postpartum","authors":"Andressa Soares de Azevedo, I. Frota, Amene Cidrão Lima, Glaucia Nunes Diniz de Oliveira, M. A. Moreira, S. Nascimento","doi":"10.1590/fm.2022.356010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: Pregnancy predisposes the emergence of pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFD), postpartum being the opportune moment to assess these muscles. Objective: To investigate the effect of instructions and verbal feedback on the contraction capacity of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in postpartum women. Methods: Quasi-experimental study with 109 women in the immediate vaginal postpartum at a reference maternity hospital in Fortaleza, Ceará state, Brazil. PFM were visually inspected using the visual contraction scale (0 = no visible contraction; 1 = weak visible contraction; 2 = visible contraction with perineal elevation), in addition to observing the use of accessory muscles and movements. Assessments occurred in consecutive moments: 1 - PFM contraction at a verbal command; 2 - contraction after instructions on structure, function and correct contraction; and 3 - contraction after feedback on the use of accessory muscles and reinforcement of correct contraction. Cochran’s Q test and a 5% significance level were used to compare the outcomes between different moments. Results: At the first assessment, 15.6% of the postpartum women did not exhibit visible PFM contraction (grade 0). Of these, 70.5% changed their contraction grade after instructions and feedback. At the end, 45.9% of women correctly contracted their PFM with perineal elevation (grade 2) (p < 000.1). The use of accessory muscles (abductors, abdominals and gluteal) declined after instructions and feedback (p < 000.1). Perineal trauma, forceps delivery, previous information and fear of feeling pain were not associated with contraction grade. Conclusion: Instructions and verbal feedback are useful tools for correct PMF contraction in the immediate postpartum.","PeriodicalId":33749,"journal":{"name":"Fisioterapia em Movimento","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisioterapia em Movimento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2022.356010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Pregnancy predisposes the emergence of pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFD), postpartum being the opportune moment to assess these muscles. Objective: To investigate the effect of instructions and verbal feedback on the contraction capacity of pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in postpartum women. Methods: Quasi-experimental study with 109 women in the immediate vaginal postpartum at a reference maternity hospital in Fortaleza, Ceará state, Brazil. PFM were visually inspected using the visual contraction scale (0 = no visible contraction; 1 = weak visible contraction; 2 = visible contraction with perineal elevation), in addition to observing the use of accessory muscles and movements. Assessments occurred in consecutive moments: 1 - PFM contraction at a verbal command; 2 - contraction after instructions on structure, function and correct contraction; and 3 - contraction after feedback on the use of accessory muscles and reinforcement of correct contraction. Cochran’s Q test and a 5% significance level were used to compare the outcomes between different moments. Results: At the first assessment, 15.6% of the postpartum women did not exhibit visible PFM contraction (grade 0). Of these, 70.5% changed their contraction grade after instructions and feedback. At the end, 45.9% of women correctly contracted their PFM with perineal elevation (grade 2) (p < 000.1). The use of accessory muscles (abductors, abdominals and gluteal) declined after instructions and feedback (p < 000.1). Perineal trauma, forceps delivery, previous information and fear of feeling pain were not associated with contraction grade. Conclusion: Instructions and verbal feedback are useful tools for correct PMF contraction in the immediate postpartum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
言语指导对产后盆底收缩的影响
摘要:妊娠易导致盆底功能障碍(PFD)的出现,产后是评估这些肌肉的最佳时机。目的:探讨指导与言语反馈对产后妇女盆底肌收缩能力的影响。方法:准实验研究109名妇女直接阴道产后在福塔莱萨,塞埃尔州的参考妇产医院,巴西。采用视收缩量表目测PFM(0 =无可见收缩;1 =弱可见收缩;2 =可见收缩伴会阴抬高),另外观察副肌的使用和动作。评估发生在连续时刻:1 -在口头命令下PFM收缩;2 -在结构、功能和正确收缩说明后收缩;3 -收缩后反馈使用副肌并加强正确收缩。使用科克伦Q检验和5%显著性水平来比较不同时刻之间的结果。结果:在第一次评估时,15.6%的产后妇女未出现明显的PFM收缩(0级),其中70.5%的妇女在指导和反馈后改变了收缩等级。最后,45.9%的女性在会阴抬高(2级)的情况下正确地收缩了PFM (p < 000.1)。在指导和反馈后,副肌(外展肌、腹肌和臀肌)的使用下降(p < 000.1)。会阴创伤、产钳输送、既往信息和对疼痛的恐惧与宫缩程度无关。结论:指导和口头反馈是产后即刻正确宫缩的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fisioterapia em Movimento
Fisioterapia em Movimento Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Engineering extracellular vesicles with macrophage membrane fusion for ameliorating imiquimod-induced psoriatic skin inflammation. elessaúde na atenção fisioterapêutica durante a pandemia de COVID-19: um relato de experiência Aquatic physical therapy effects on cardiorespiratory variables in Parkinson's disease Intrinsic foot strengthening and electrostimulation in older adults - Randomized clinical trial Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1