Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study

Q4 Medicine Fisioterapia em Movimento Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1590/fm.2023.36125
Rafaela Maria de Souza, Afonso de Mello Tiburcio, Ana Carolina de Jacomo Claudio, J. K. Micheletti, B. R. S. Menossi
{"title":"Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study","authors":"Rafaela Maria de Souza, Afonso de Mello Tiburcio, Ana Carolina de Jacomo Claudio, J. K. Micheletti, B. R. S. Menossi","doi":"10.1590/fm.2023.36125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the frequent traumatic injuries of the knee joint complex, and the isokinetic dynamometer is essential to assess and measure its joint function. Objective To analyze the volume of physical therapy treatment using the same protocol with different duration in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Methods This is a prospective observational cohort study. The sample consisted of 13 adult male individuals who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery. Participants were divided into two groups: accelerated treatment (AC) and non-accelerated treatment (NAC). Participants underwent a standardized protocol of post-reconstruction physio-therapy, starting in the immediate postoperative period. The AC group performed the treatment three times a week, with a duration of 4 hours each session for 6 months, while the NAC performed twice a week with duration of two hours each session for eight months. Results The groups showed the same behavior during the post-reconstruction treatment periods, showing that regardless of time, the results were beneficial at the end of the treatment. However, in the accelerated protocol, the injured limb showed a significant difference for extender peak torque (PTEXT) in the preoperative and 4-month postoperative period (230.5 vs 182.6), 4-month postoperative period and final (182.6 vs 242.1) in the AC group, while in the NAC group there was no significant difference between times in this same limb. Conclusion Greater volumes of weekly training characterized better results, showing that rehabilitation time is not a predictor of discharge, but rehabilitation time obtains good results for the variables.","PeriodicalId":33749,"journal":{"name":"Fisioterapia em Movimento","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fisioterapia em Movimento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/fm.2023.36125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the frequent traumatic injuries of the knee joint complex, and the isokinetic dynamometer is essential to assess and measure its joint function. Objective To analyze the volume of physical therapy treatment using the same protocol with different duration in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction. Methods This is a prospective observational cohort study. The sample consisted of 13 adult male individuals who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery. Participants were divided into two groups: accelerated treatment (AC) and non-accelerated treatment (NAC). Participants underwent a standardized protocol of post-reconstruction physio-therapy, starting in the immediate postoperative period. The AC group performed the treatment three times a week, with a duration of 4 hours each session for 6 months, while the NAC performed twice a week with duration of two hours each session for eight months. Results The groups showed the same behavior during the post-reconstruction treatment periods, showing that regardless of time, the results were beneficial at the end of the treatment. However, in the accelerated protocol, the injured limb showed a significant difference for extender peak torque (PTEXT) in the preoperative and 4-month postoperative period (230.5 vs 182.6), 4-month postoperative period and final (182.6 vs 242.1) in the AC group, while in the NAC group there was no significant difference between times in this same limb. Conclusion Greater volumes of weekly training characterized better results, showing that rehabilitation time is not a predictor of discharge, but rehabilitation time obtains good results for the variables.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前交叉韧带重建后最终康复容量是否影响功能?一项初步研究
摘要简介前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂是膝关节复合体常见的外伤性损伤之一,等速测功仪是评估和测量其关节功能的必要手段。目的分析前交叉韧带重建患者采用相同方案不同疗程的物理治疗量。方法前瞻性观察队列研究。样本包括13名接受前交叉韧带重建手术的成年男性。参与者分为两组:加速治疗组(AC)和非加速治疗组(NAC)。参与者在术后立即开始接受重建后物理治疗的标准化方案。AC组每周治疗3次,每次治疗4小时,持续6个月;NAC组每周治疗2次,每次治疗2小时,持续8个月。结果各组在重建后治疗期间表现出相同的行为,表明无论时间如何,治疗结束时的结果都是有益的。然而,在加速方案中,AC组损伤肢体在术前和术后4个月(230.5 vs 182.6)、术后4个月和最终(182.6 vs 242.1)的伸臂峰值扭矩(PTEXT)有显著差异,而NAC组同一肢体在不同时间间无显著差异。结论每周训练量越大,效果越好,康复时间不是出院的预测因子,但康复时间对变量有较好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fisioterapia em Movimento
Fisioterapia em Movimento Health Professions-Complementary and Manual Therapy
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Engineering extracellular vesicles with macrophage membrane fusion for ameliorating imiquimod-induced psoriatic skin inflammation. elessaúde na atenção fisioterapêutica durante a pandemia de COVID-19: um relato de experiência Aquatic physical therapy effects on cardiorespiratory variables in Parkinson's disease Intrinsic foot strengthening and electrostimulation in older adults - Randomized clinical trial Do final rehabilitation volumes influence function after anterior cross ligament reconstruction? A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1