Effect of Glycolic Acid, Maleic Acid, and EDTA in the Removal of Smear Layer from Root Canal Dentin

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1590/pboci.2023.041
Tarini Mullick, N. Ballal
{"title":"Effect of Glycolic Acid, Maleic Acid, and EDTA in the Removal of Smear Layer from Root Canal Dentin","authors":"Tarini Mullick, N. Ballal","doi":"10.1590/pboci.2023.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the efficacy of 5% Glycolic Acid (GA), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 7% maleic acid (MA), in removing the smear layer (SL). Material and Methods: For the experiment, forty single-rooted human teeth were selected. To perform the chemo ‑ mechanical preparation, the root canals were instrumented to an apical size of #30, along with simultaneous irrigation of 2.5% NaOCl. The samples were allotted to the experimental groups based on the final irrigating solution (n=10): (1) The GA group: 05%, (2) the EDTA group: 17%, (3) the MA group: 7%, and (4) the control group: Distilled water. The teeth were evaluated for the presence or absence of SL using SEM. Results: Comparing the 5% GA, 7% MA and 17% EDTA groups, no statistically significant differences were found at the coronal and middle thirds (p>0.05). However, in the apical third, MA had greater efficacy than EDTA (p=0.002) and GA (p=0.041), with a significant difference in the SL removal, while there was no significant difference between the latter (p=0.148). Conclusion: Thus, it was concluded that 7% maleic acid as a final irrigating solution is more efficacious than 17% EDTA and 5% glycolic acid in eliminating the smear layer from the apical portion of the root canal.","PeriodicalId":45592,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clinica Integrada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2023.041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the efficacy of 5% Glycolic Acid (GA), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 7% maleic acid (MA), in removing the smear layer (SL). Material and Methods: For the experiment, forty single-rooted human teeth were selected. To perform the chemo ‑ mechanical preparation, the root canals were instrumented to an apical size of #30, along with simultaneous irrigation of 2.5% NaOCl. The samples were allotted to the experimental groups based on the final irrigating solution (n=10): (1) The GA group: 05%, (2) the EDTA group: 17%, (3) the MA group: 7%, and (4) the control group: Distilled water. The teeth were evaluated for the presence or absence of SL using SEM. Results: Comparing the 5% GA, 7% MA and 17% EDTA groups, no statistically significant differences were found at the coronal and middle thirds (p>0.05). However, in the apical third, MA had greater efficacy than EDTA (p=0.002) and GA (p=0.041), with a significant difference in the SL removal, while there was no significant difference between the latter (p=0.148). Conclusion: Thus, it was concluded that 7% maleic acid as a final irrigating solution is more efficacious than 17% EDTA and 5% glycolic acid in eliminating the smear layer from the apical portion of the root canal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乙醇酸、马来酸和EDTA对根管牙本质涂抹层去除的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA operates under a continuous publication online modality. This model results in annual volumes, without issue numbers. The main goal of the PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA is to publish results from Original Research as well as Systematic Reviews in the fields of Dentistry and related sciences areas. Its abbreviated title is Pesqui. Bras. Odontopediatria Clin. Integr., and it should be used in bibliographies, footnotes, references and bibliographic strips. PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA encourages submissions from all authors throughout the world. Manuscripts are judged by two experts solely on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas and their presentation. All manuscripts must comply with Instruction to Authors. The following articles will be considered for publication: Editorials, Original Articles, Systematic Reviews, Short communications and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Quality of Dental Health Services to Patient Satisfaction in Indonesia 2019: Importance-Performance Analysis The Effect of Chlorhexidine on Bacterial Contamination of Hall Technique Elastomeric Orthodontic Separators and Gingival Health: A Pilot Study Donor Site Morbidity of Nonvascularized Bone Graft: A Systematic Review A 14-Year Follow-Up Study of Sequelae in Primary Teeth and Permanent Successors After Dental Trauma Channa Striata and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Combination for Pressure Areas in Orthodontic Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1