{"title":"Mensuração de Atitude: Proposição de um Protocolo de Elaboração de Escalas","authors":"Rafael Lucian, J. S. Dornelas","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC20151559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This theoretical essay aims to study how scales are developed and through which procedures they can be considered valid and suitable for use as legitimate scientific instruments. In this perspective, this paper's objective was to develop a protocol for constructing scales to measure attitude. The proposed protocol is configured as a logical meeting of steps based on theorists such as Allport and Hartman (1925), Thurstone (1928), Likert (1932), Campbell and Fiske (1959)and Bock (1972), which permeate all aspects of drafting scales, including construct definition, the choice of the scale itself, item preparation, scale purification, and finally its validation. At the end of the study, we present a protocol for the preparation of specific scales to measure attitude that differs from existing protocols in Churchill (1979), Rossiter (2002) and DeVellis (2003). This is in order to unite for the first time a set of promising techniques, primarily the objective delineation of the construct using focus group methodology, the proposition of an inherently dichotomous scale, scale purification via item response theory (IRT), and predictive validity.","PeriodicalId":53246,"journal":{"name":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","volume":"19 1","pages":"157-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1982-7849RAC20151559","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC20151559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24
Abstract
This theoretical essay aims to study how scales are developed and through which procedures they can be considered valid and suitable for use as legitimate scientific instruments. In this perspective, this paper's objective was to develop a protocol for constructing scales to measure attitude. The proposed protocol is configured as a logical meeting of steps based on theorists such as Allport and Hartman (1925), Thurstone (1928), Likert (1932), Campbell and Fiske (1959)and Bock (1972), which permeate all aspects of drafting scales, including construct definition, the choice of the scale itself, item preparation, scale purification, and finally its validation. At the end of the study, we present a protocol for the preparation of specific scales to measure attitude that differs from existing protocols in Churchill (1979), Rossiter (2002) and DeVellis (2003). This is in order to unite for the first time a set of promising techniques, primarily the objective delineation of the construct using focus group methodology, the proposition of an inherently dichotomous scale, scale purification via item response theory (IRT), and predictive validity.
这篇理论论文旨在研究量表是如何发展的,以及通过哪些程序,它们可以被认为是有效的,适合作为合法的科学仪器使用。从这个角度来看,本文的目的是制定一个协议来构建量表来测量态度。根据Allport and Hartman(1925)、Thurstone(1928)、Likert(1932)、Campbell and Fiske(1959)和Bock(1972)等理论家的理论,所提出的协议被配置为步骤的逻辑会议,这些步骤渗透到起草量表的各个方面,包括结构定义、量表本身的选择、项目准备、量表纯化,最后是其验证。在研究结束时,我们提出了一份协议,用于准备特定的尺度来测量态度,不同于丘吉尔(1979),罗西特(2002)和威利斯(2003)现有的协议。这是为了第一次统一一套有前途的技术,主要是使用焦点小组方法客观描述结构,固有二分量表的主张,通过项目反应理论(IRT)进行量表净化,以及预测效度。