Fenomenografia e Valoração do Conhecimento nas Organizações: Diálogo entre Método e Fenômeno

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI:10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150292
Andrea Cherman, Sandra Regina da Rocha-Pinto
{"title":"Fenomenografia e Valoração do Conhecimento nas Organizações: Diálogo entre Método e Fenômeno","authors":"Andrea Cherman, Sandra Regina da Rocha-Pinto","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phenomenography is a little-known qualitative research methodology in organizational studies. It aims to capture the various conceptions individuals have about a phenomenon, that is, the different qualitative ways to experience and conceive of it (Marton, 1981; Marton & Booth, 1997; Sandberg, 2000). This theoretical paper aimed to shed light on the research experience using the method, explaining unexpected emergent findings not reported in the literature, via an empirical study with HR professionals on valuing knowledge in the context of work. The research revealed five conceptions, which were arranged in a logical, hierarchical, comprehensive, and interdependent manner, as stated by the method. Then, a focus group (Goldman & McDonald, 1987) with prototypical and representative participants of the categories was held in order to validate the descriptive categories and enhance understanding of the unexpected emergent findings. The serendipitous findings unveiled: (a) the capacity of phenomenography to capture subjects' two-way movement across conceptions in experiencing the phenomenon; (b) the uninterrupted continuum between the conceptions; and (c) the dynamic trajectory of individuals through conceptions in time and space, using them as modes of action to guide their behavior in relation to diverse contexts.","PeriodicalId":53246,"journal":{"name":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","volume":"20 1","pages":"630-650"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016150292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Phenomenography is a little-known qualitative research methodology in organizational studies. It aims to capture the various conceptions individuals have about a phenomenon, that is, the different qualitative ways to experience and conceive of it (Marton, 1981; Marton & Booth, 1997; Sandberg, 2000). This theoretical paper aimed to shed light on the research experience using the method, explaining unexpected emergent findings not reported in the literature, via an empirical study with HR professionals on valuing knowledge in the context of work. The research revealed five conceptions, which were arranged in a logical, hierarchical, comprehensive, and interdependent manner, as stated by the method. Then, a focus group (Goldman & McDonald, 1987) with prototypical and representative participants of the categories was held in order to validate the descriptive categories and enhance understanding of the unexpected emergent findings. The serendipitous findings unveiled: (a) the capacity of phenomenography to capture subjects' two-way movement across conceptions in experiencing the phenomenon; (b) the uninterrupted continuum between the conceptions; and (c) the dynamic trajectory of individuals through conceptions in time and space, using them as modes of action to guide their behavior in relation to diverse contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织中的现象学与知识评估:方法与现象的对话
现象学是组织研究中一种鲜为人知的定性研究方法。它旨在捕捉个体对一种现象的各种概念,即体验和理解这种现象的不同定性方式(Marton, 1981;Marton & Booth, 1997;桑德伯格,2000)。这篇理论论文旨在阐明使用该方法的研究经验,通过对人力资源专业人员在工作背景下评估知识的实证研究,解释文献中未报道的意外发现。研究揭示了五个概念,这些概念按照逻辑、层次、综合和相互依存的方式排列。然后,举行了一个焦点小组(Goldman & McDonald, 1987),其中包括类别的原型和代表性参与者,以验证描述性类别并增强对意外突发发现的理解。这些偶然发现揭示了:(a)现象学捕捉被试在体验现象时跨概念的双向运动的能力;(b)概念之间的连续统一体;(c)个体通过时间和空间概念的动态轨迹,将其作为行动模式来指导他们在不同背景下的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lugar de Mulher é… na Política: Reflexões sobre Micro e Macroagressões de Identidades Raízes da Exaustão de Mulheres Trabalhadoras Brasileiras: Contribuições do Materialismo Histórico Dialético The (Un)productivity of Reproductive Work and the Woman’s Exhaustion in Contemporary Times A (Im)produtividade do Trabalho Reprodutivo e a Exaustão das Mulheres na Contemporaneidade A Woman’s Place is… in Politics: Reflections about Micro and Macroaggressions of Identities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1