Técnicas de Prospecção: Um Estudo Comparativo

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI:10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016140016
D. Reis, Ticiana Braga de Vincenzi, Fabrício Palermo Pupo
{"title":"Técnicas de Prospecção: Um Estudo Comparativo","authors":"D. Reis, Ticiana Braga de Vincenzi, Fabrício Palermo Pupo","doi":"10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016140016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Future technologies may affect a company’s business, and prediction of such technologies is an important step in the planning process, especially regarding cutting-edge technology industries. The objective of this paper is to develop a comparative theoretical study on key techniques aimed at predicting future technologies, evaluated according to six criteria: operation costs; required number of people; required time to obtain results; operation complexity, that is, ease of implementing techniques; analysis type (subjective or objective), wherein quantitative techniques are considered more objective; and reliability of results (consistency and replicability). Thus, this study provides parameters to assist companies in selecting the most suitable prospective techniques, according to their needs. The research methodology is qualitative, and the study scope is a descriptive analysis using bibliographic and documentary research as data collection methods. The conclusion is that it is advantageous to use several methods simultaneously, providing higher efficiency and producing better assessments. Finally, it is hoped that this article launches a debate on the assigned criteria for techniques used to predict future technologies.","PeriodicalId":53246,"journal":{"name":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","volume":"20 1","pages":"135-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016140016","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAC Revista de Administracao Contemporanea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849RAC2016140016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Future technologies may affect a company’s business, and prediction of such technologies is an important step in the planning process, especially regarding cutting-edge technology industries. The objective of this paper is to develop a comparative theoretical study on key techniques aimed at predicting future technologies, evaluated according to six criteria: operation costs; required number of people; required time to obtain results; operation complexity, that is, ease of implementing techniques; analysis type (subjective or objective), wherein quantitative techniques are considered more objective; and reliability of results (consistency and replicability). Thus, this study provides parameters to assist companies in selecting the most suitable prospective techniques, according to their needs. The research methodology is qualitative, and the study scope is a descriptive analysis using bibliographic and documentary research as data collection methods. The conclusion is that it is advantageous to use several methods simultaneously, providing higher efficiency and producing better assessments. Finally, it is hoped that this article launches a debate on the assigned criteria for techniques used to predict future technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
勘探技术:比较研究
未来的技术可能会影响公司的业务,对这些技术的预测是规划过程中的重要一步,特别是对于尖端技术行业。本文的目的是开展一项旨在预测未来技术的关键技术的比较理论研究,根据六个标准进行评估:运营成本;所需人数;获得结果所需的时间;操作复杂性,即实现技术的难易程度;分析类型(主观或客观),其中定量技术被认为更客观;结果的可靠性(一致性和可复制性)。因此,本研究提供参数,以协助公司选择最合适的前瞻性技术,根据他们的需要。研究方法是定性的,研究范围是描述性的分析,使用书目和文献研究作为数据收集方法。结论是,同时使用几种方法是有利的,可以提供更高的效率和更好的评估。最后,希望本文能引发一场关于用于预测未来技术的技术指定标准的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lugar de Mulher é… na Política: Reflexões sobre Micro e Macroagressões de Identidades Raízes da Exaustão de Mulheres Trabalhadoras Brasileiras: Contribuições do Materialismo Histórico Dialético The (Un)productivity of Reproductive Work and the Woman’s Exhaustion in Contemporary Times A (Im)produtividade do Trabalho Reprodutivo e a Exaustão das Mulheres na Contemporaneidade A Woman’s Place is… in Politics: Reflections about Micro and Macroaggressions of Identities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1