Genetic diversity and relationship of mango and its wild relatives (Mangifera spp.) based on morphological and molecular markers

IF 0.8 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical Pub Date : 2023-08-04 DOI:10.1590/1983-40632023v5375339
D. H. Mursyidin
{"title":"Genetic diversity and relationship of mango and its wild relatives (Mangifera spp.) based on morphological and molecular markers","authors":"D. H. Mursyidin","doi":"10.1590/1983-40632023v5375339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mango and its wild relatives (Mangifera spp.) are essential for future mango breeding, including preservation programs, because they provide many beneficial genes (agronomic traits), particularly those related to resistance to biotic and abiotic stressors. However, there is a limited understanding of the genetic diversity and relationships of this germplasm. This study aimed to determine the diversity and relationship between endemic mango and its wild relatives (Mangifera spp.) from Borneo Island, Indonesia, using leaf morphology and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Fifteen samples of Mangifera, covering 12 species, were used. Morphologically, the endemic Mangifera had a low diversity of only 0.22. Based on the ITS sequence, Mangifera endemic to Borneo had a high level of genetic diversity (0.069). In addition, this sequence had a total variable number of 215 bp, of which 110 bp were singleton sites, 89 informative parsimony and 41 indels. Phylogenetic analysis showed that Mangifera was grouped into three clusters for leaf morphological traits and four clades for the ITS region. In this case, the furthest relationship was pointed out by ‘Hampalam’ (M. laurina) and ‘Tambusui’ (M. macrocarpa), as well as by ‘Rawa-Rawa’ (M. similis) and ‘Samputar’ (M. torquenda). In contrast, the closest relationship was shown by ‘Hambawang Damar’ (M. foetida) and ‘Hambawang Puntara’ (M. foetida), including ‘Samputar’ (M. torquenda) and ‘Pauh’ (M. quadrifida). In particular, the common mango (M. indica) was closely related to ‘Asam Buluh’ and ‘Hampalam’ (M. laurina) and distantly related to ‘Pauh’ (M. quadrifida) and ‘Rawa-Rawa’ (M. similis).","PeriodicalId":46867,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632023v5375339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Mango and its wild relatives (Mangifera spp.) are essential for future mango breeding, including preservation programs, because they provide many beneficial genes (agronomic traits), particularly those related to resistance to biotic and abiotic stressors. However, there is a limited understanding of the genetic diversity and relationships of this germplasm. This study aimed to determine the diversity and relationship between endemic mango and its wild relatives (Mangifera spp.) from Borneo Island, Indonesia, using leaf morphology and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. Fifteen samples of Mangifera, covering 12 species, were used. Morphologically, the endemic Mangifera had a low diversity of only 0.22. Based on the ITS sequence, Mangifera endemic to Borneo had a high level of genetic diversity (0.069). In addition, this sequence had a total variable number of 215 bp, of which 110 bp were singleton sites, 89 informative parsimony and 41 indels. Phylogenetic analysis showed that Mangifera was grouped into three clusters for leaf morphological traits and four clades for the ITS region. In this case, the furthest relationship was pointed out by ‘Hampalam’ (M. laurina) and ‘Tambusui’ (M. macrocarpa), as well as by ‘Rawa-Rawa’ (M. similis) and ‘Samputar’ (M. torquenda). In contrast, the closest relationship was shown by ‘Hambawang Damar’ (M. foetida) and ‘Hambawang Puntara’ (M. foetida), including ‘Samputar’ (M. torquenda) and ‘Pauh’ (M. quadrifida). In particular, the common mango (M. indica) was closely related to ‘Asam Buluh’ and ‘Hampalam’ (M. laurina) and distantly related to ‘Pauh’ (M. quadrifida) and ‘Rawa-Rawa’ (M. similis).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于形态和分子标记的芒果及其野生近缘种的遗传多样性和亲缘关系
芒果及其野生近缘种(Mangifera spp.)对未来的芒果育种(包括保存计划)至关重要,因为它们提供了许多有益的基因(农艺性状),特别是那些与抵抗生物和非生物应激源有关的基因。然而,人们对这种种质的遗传多样性和相互关系的了解有限。本研究旨在利用叶片形态学和内部转录间隔区(its)研究印度尼西亚婆罗洲岛芒果的多样性及其野生近缘种(Mangifera spp.)的亲缘关系。利用芒果属植物12种15份样本。在形态上,特有的芒果属植物多样性较低,仅为0.22。根据ITS序列,婆罗洲特有的芒果具有较高的遗传多样性(0.069)。该序列总变异数为215 bp,其中单位点110 bp,信息简约性89条,索引41条。系统发育分析表明,芒果属植物叶片形态特征可分为3个聚类,ITS区可分为4个支系。在这种情况下,“Hampalam”(M. laurina)和“Tambusui”(M. macrocarpa)以及“Rawa-Rawa”(M. similis)和“Samputar”(M. torquenda)指出了最远的关系。相比之下,“Hambawang Damar”(M. foetida)和“Hambawang Puntara”(M. foetida)表现出最密切的关系,包括“Samputar”(M. torquenda)和“Pauh”(M. quadriida)。特别是,普通芒果(M. indica)与“Asam Buluh”和“Hampalam”(M. laurina)密切相关,与“Pauh”(M. quadriida)和“Rawa-Rawa”(M. similis)有远亲关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Genetic diversity and relationship of mango and its wild relatives (Mangifera spp.) based on morphological and molecular markers Biochemical characterization of individual and combined plant growth-promoting microorganisms Nitrogen fertilization time affects the root reserves of tropical grasses Influence of native field management on soil, water erosion and nutrient losses Statistical downscaling in the TRMM satellite rainfall estimates for the Goiás state and the Federal District, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1