Power, Trust and Transparency as Determinant Factors of Tax Compliance: A Systematic Review

IF 1 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Tax Reform Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.15826/jtr.2022.8.3.124
Mohammed Saleh Al-Maghrebi, Noor Sharoja Sapiei, Mazni Abdullah
{"title":"Power, Trust and Transparency as Determinant Factors of Tax Compliance: A Systematic Review","authors":"Mohammed Saleh Al-Maghrebi, Noor Sharoja Sapiei, Mazni Abdullah","doi":"10.15826/jtr.2022.8.3.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review emphasizes the importance of expanding and deepening the theoretical framework of research on individual taxpayer compliance, particularly through integrated models. The main objective of this article is to systematically review the literature on tax compliance based on three determinants: coercive power, trust in tax authorities and transparency; and provide a direction for future research. There are three review questions in this paper, namely: (1) What is the present situation of the literature on the connection between coercive power and tax compliance; (2) What is the present situation of the literature on the connection between trust in tax authorities and tax compliance; (3) What is the present situation of the literature on the connection between “relationship transparency” and tax compliance. A systematic review of the literature was used to perform this review, considering 66 studies published in several suggested databases. The results are a call for a more sophisticated understanding of not only how suggested factors (Coercive Power; Trust; Transparency) affect tax compliance, but also how they interact and change each other and then, influence tax compliance. This review implies that enhancing tax service, transparency, and government trust is more successful and relatively easier to proceed than encouraging positive behaviour among taxpayers. This review is the first to systematically analyse the literature on tax compliance based on three determinants (coercive power, trust and transparency), as found, no synthesis studies have comprehensively covered the issue. This results in unique, motivating, and relevant discoveries that may be used to direct future studies and serve as a tool for academics, practitioners, and policymakers. Furthermore, this study would aid governments and tax authorities to understand the motives and perceptions of taxpayers into taxes.","PeriodicalId":53924,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tax Reform","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tax Reform","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2022.8.3.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review emphasizes the importance of expanding and deepening the theoretical framework of research on individual taxpayer compliance, particularly through integrated models. The main objective of this article is to systematically review the literature on tax compliance based on three determinants: coercive power, trust in tax authorities and transparency; and provide a direction for future research. There are three review questions in this paper, namely: (1) What is the present situation of the literature on the connection between coercive power and tax compliance; (2) What is the present situation of the literature on the connection between trust in tax authorities and tax compliance; (3) What is the present situation of the literature on the connection between “relationship transparency” and tax compliance. A systematic review of the literature was used to perform this review, considering 66 studies published in several suggested databases. The results are a call for a more sophisticated understanding of not only how suggested factors (Coercive Power; Trust; Transparency) affect tax compliance, but also how they interact and change each other and then, influence tax compliance. This review implies that enhancing tax service, transparency, and government trust is more successful and relatively easier to proceed than encouraging positive behaviour among taxpayers. This review is the first to systematically analyse the literature on tax compliance based on three determinants (coercive power, trust and transparency), as found, no synthesis studies have comprehensively covered the issue. This results in unique, motivating, and relevant discoveries that may be used to direct future studies and serve as a tool for academics, practitioners, and policymakers. Furthermore, this study would aid governments and tax authorities to understand the motives and perceptions of taxpayers into taxes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
权力、信任和透明度作为税收合规的决定因素:系统回顾
这一系统综述强调了扩展和深化纳税人个人合规研究理论框架的重要性,特别是通过整合模型。本文的主要目的是系统地回顾基于三个决定因素的税收合规文献:强制性权力,对税务机关的信任和透明度;并为今后的研究提供方向。本文有三个考察问题,即:(1)关于强制力与税收合规关系的文献现状如何;(2)税务机关信任与税收合规关系的文献研究现状如何?(3)关于“关系透明度”与税收合规性关系的文献现状如何?我们对文献进行了系统回顾,考虑了在几个建议的数据库中发表的66项研究。结果是,我们需要更复杂的理解,不仅是建议的因素(强制权力;信任;透明度)影响税收合规性,以及它们如何相互作用和改变,然后影响税收合规性。这一审查表明,加强税收服务、透明度和政府信任比鼓励纳税人的积极行为更成功,也相对更容易进行。这篇综述首次系统地分析了基于三个决定因素(强制性权力、信任和透明度)的税收合规文献,发现没有综合研究全面涵盖了这个问题。这导致了独特的、激励的和相关的发现,可以用来指导未来的研究,并作为学者、从业者和政策制定者的工具。此外,本研究将有助于政府和税务机关了解纳税人对税收的动机和看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tax Reform
Journal of Tax Reform BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
50.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
MSMEs Tax Compliance in Indonesia During Pandemic COVID-19: The Role of Risk Preference as Moderation The influence of foreign ownership on tax avoidance in Thailand: A study from an emerging economy Rationality of the Tax and Economic Behavior of Enterprises in the Russian Forestry Sector Economic Growth and Optimal Tax Burden: A Case of Uzbekistan’s Economy The Impact of Indirect Taxation on Inequality in Russia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1